The effects of partisan third parties on negotiator behavior and outcome perceptions

Two sources of third-party partisanship are: (1) the preexisting affiliation a third party may have with the negotiators and (2) the overt support a third party demonstrates by imposing an outcome. In 2 experiments, subjects involved in a negotiation simulation were told prior to negotiation that the third party was either positively affiliated with their side or with their opponent's side. In both studies, third parties imposed settlements on the disputants, reflecting varying degrees of overt support. The results suggest that negative third-party affiliation reduced disputant outcome expectations (thereby improving the likelihood of an agreement) and led to enhanced ratings of outcome and third-party satisfaction relative to favorable third-party affiliation

[1]  Donald E. Conlon,et al.  Intravention: Third-party intervention with clout. , 1994 .

[2]  P. Carnevale,et al.  General Alignment and Overt Support in Biased Mediation , 1991 .

[3]  Robert G. Lord,et al.  An Application of Control Theory to Understanding the Relationship Between Performance and Satisfaction , 1991 .

[4]  M. Bazerman,et al.  Cognition and Rationality in Negotiation , 1991 .

[5]  J. Grosch,et al.  Community mediation : a handbook for practitioners and researchers , 1991 .

[6]  John Keith Murnighan,et al.  The Dynamics of Bargaining Games , 1991 .

[7]  Donald E. Conlon,et al.  Influence of Speed of Third-Party Intervention and Outcome on Negotiator and Constituent Fairness Judgments , 1990 .

[8]  J. Brett,et al.  Managers Handling Disputes: Third-Party Roles and Perceptions of Fairness , 1989 .

[9]  Dean B. McFarlin,et al.  Standards of comparison and job satisfaction. , 1989 .

[10]  John Forester,et al.  Beyond neutrality , 1989 .

[11]  Blair H. Sheppard,et al.  Research on Negotiation in Organizations, Vol. 1. , 1989 .

[12]  Pruitt,et al.  Mediation Research: The Process and Effectiveness of Third-Party Intervention , 1989 .

[13]  Dean G. Pruitt,et al.  The Mediation Process , 1987 .

[14]  P. Hanges,et al.  A control system model of organizational motivation: Theoretical development and applied implications , 1987 .

[15]  J. Keith Murnighan,et al.  The Structure of Mediation and Intravention: Comments on Carnevale's Strategic Choice Model , 1986 .

[16]  Peter J. Carnevale,et al.  Strategic choice in mediation , 1986 .

[17]  William P. Smith.  Effectiveness of the biased mediator , 1985 .

[18]  Blair H. Sheppard,et al.  Do managers mediate, or even arbitrate? , 1985 .

[19]  E. Douvan,et al.  Male and female visions of mediation , 1985 .

[20]  L. Ross,et al.  The hostile media phenomenon: biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. , 1985, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  I. Zartman,et al.  International Mediation: Conflict Resolution and Power Politics , 1985 .

[22]  Deborah M. Kolb,et al.  To Be a Mediator: Expressive Tactics in Mediation , 1985 .

[23]  Robin I. Lissak,et al.  Apparent impropriety and procedural fairness judgments , 1985 .

[24]  Blair H. Sheppard.  Third party conflict intervention: A procedural framework. , 1984 .

[25]  L. Susskind,et al.  Mediated Negotiation in the Public Sector , 1983 .

[26]  T. Colosi.  Negotiation in the Public and Private Sectors , 1983 .

[27]  Blair H. Sheppard,et al.  Beyond Fairness: The Criterion Problem in Research on Dispute Intervention1 , 1983 .

[28]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[29]  J. C. Campbell,et al.  Dynamics of third party intervention : Kissinger in the Middle East , 1981 .

[30]  H. Zeisel,et al.  Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis , 1978 .

[31]  Henry Mintzberg.  The Nature of Managerial Work , 1974, Operational Research Quarterly (1970-1977).

[32]  O. Young,et al.  The Intermediaries: Third Parties in International Crises , 1967 .

[33]  W. Edwards,et al.  Decision and Choice: Contributions of Sidney Siegel , 1967 .