Assembly Operations Aided by Augmented Reality: An Endeavour toward a Comparative Analysis☆

Abstract Costly complex assembly operations supported by augmented reality demands endeavors to achieve a comparative and experimental depiction of different circumstances for assays to analyze fluctuating conclusions where the situation with limited number of tries has compelled to recognize that variations exist depending on test conditions. Then developments in emergent technologies, for training in Maintenance and Repair Operations (MRO), must be evaluated. Scenarios are focused on assessing an AR request, by stating a confrontation of declarations about assembly time and comparisons respect to outstanding authors who conduct assembly operations. An assembly operations case study establishes a small sample size during experimentation.

[1]  Steven K. Feiner,et al.  Exploring the Benefits of Augmented Reality Documentation for Maintenance and Repair , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[2]  Mauricio Hincapié,et al.  Augmented Reality: An Advantageous Option for Complex Training and Maintenance Operations in Aeronautic Related Processes , 2011, HCI.

[3]  Søren S. Sørensen.  Augmented Reality for Improved Communication of Construction and Maintenance Plans in Nuclear Power Plants , 2014 .

[4]  Andrew Y. C. Nee,et al.  Augmented reality applications in design and manufacturing , 2012 .

[5]  Luigi di Stefano,et al.  Augmented Reality for Aircraft Maintenance Training and Operations Support , 2011, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[6]  Eduardo González Mendívil,et al.  Sample Size Estimation for Statistical Comparative Test of Training by Using Augmented Reality via Theoretical Formula and OCC Graphs: Aeronautical Case of a Component Assemblage , 2011, HCI.

[7]  Olaf Oehme,et al.  Augmented Reality (AR) for Assembly Processes Design and Experimental Evaluation , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[8]  Steven K. Feiner,et al.  Evaluating the benefits of augmented reality for task localization in maintenance of an armored personnel carrier turret , 2009, 2009 8th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality.

[9]  Ronald Azuma,et al.  A Survey of Augmented Reality , 1997, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[10]  Xiangyu Wang,et al.  Compatibility issues in Augmented Reality systems for AEC: An experimental prototype study , 2006 .

[11]  Andrew Y. C. Nee,et al.  Augmented Reality Aided Assembly Design and Planning , 2007 .

[12]  Jurjen Caarls,et al.  Augmented Reality for Art, Design and Cultural Heritage—System Design and Evaluation , 2009, EURASIP J. Image Video Process..

[13]  Yan Pang,et al.  Assembly feature design in an augmented reality environment , 2006 .

[14]  Fernando Suarez-Warden,et al.  Assessment of communicative learning via Augmented Reality versus traditional method for aeronautical transportation , 2011, 2011 13th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks.

[15]  Andrew Y. C. Nee,et al.  Augmented reality for assembly guidance using a virtual interactive tool , 2008 .

[16]  Ulrich Neumann,et al.  Cognitive, performance, and systems issues for augmented reality applications in manufacturing and maintenance , 1998, Proceedings. IEEE 1998 Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium (Cat. No.98CB36180).

[17]  Gunther Reinhart,et al.  Integrating Augmented Reality in the Assembly Domain - Fundamentals, Benefits and Applications , 2003 .

[18]  Ronald Azuma,et al.  Recent Advances in Augmented Reality , 2001, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.