Task complexity and task, goal, and reward interdependence in group performance management: A prescriptive model

A prescriptive model on how to design effective combinations of goal setting and contingent rewards for group performance management is presented. The model incorporates the constructs task complexity, task interdependence, goal interdependence, and reward interdependence and specifies optimal fit relationships between these constructs. Four propositions address the levels of goal interdependence that should be created given certain levels of task complexity and task interdependence. Based on the assumption that reward systems should reinforce goal attainment through a level of reward interdependence that is similar to the level of interdependence created by the goals, four additional propositions are formulated. These are confronted with the results of experimental studies on the effects of reward interdependence on group performance. We argue that the research on effective combinations of goal setting and contingent rewards for the performance management of groups will benefit from studies in which: (1) both task interdependence and task complexity are taken into account, and (2) goal interdependence and rewards interdependence are manipulated separately.

[1]  Jon S. Bailey,et al.  The Effects of Group and Individual Monetary Incentives on Productivity of Telephone Interviewers , 2000 .

[2]  Milton E. Rosenbaum,et al.  Group Productivity and Process: Pure and Mixed Reward Structures and Task Interdependence. , 1980 .

[3]  D. Tjosvold,et al.  Interdependence and Controversy in Group Decision Making: Antecedents to Effective Self-Managing Teams. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[4]  R. Saavedra,et al.  Complex interdependence in task-performing groups , 1993 .

[5]  L. Weingart,et al.  Group goals and group performance , 1993 .

[6]  Robert D. Pritchard,et al.  Productivity Measurement and Improvement: Organizational Case Studies , 1995 .

[7]  B. Emans,et al.  Motivating Effects of Task and Outcome Interdependence in Work Teams , 1998 .

[8]  Robert L. Hamblin,et al.  Interdependence, differential rewarding, and productivity. , 1963 .

[9]  George P. Baker,et al.  Incentives and cooperation: the joint effects of task and reward interdependence on group performance , 1997 .

[10]  T. Mitchell,et al.  Individual and group goals when workers are interdependent: Effects on task strategies and performance. , 1990 .

[11]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Team Structure and Performance: Assessing the Mediating Role of Intrateam Process and the Moderating Role of Task Type , 2000 .

[12]  Gerard H. Seijts,et al.  The effect of distal learning, outcome, and proximal goals on a moderately complex task , 2001 .

[13]  Canice Prendergast.  The Provision of Incentives in Firms , 1999 .

[14]  Henry L. Tosi.  A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance , 1991 .

[15]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Impact of Positive Interdependence and Academic Group Contingencies on Achievement , 1988 .

[16]  Tamao Matsui,et al.  Effects of goals and feedback on performance in groups. , 1987 .

[17]  R. Wageman.  Interdependence and Group Effectiveness , 1995 .

[18]  Deborah H. Gruenfeld,et al.  When Needs Outweigh Desires: The Effects of Resource Interdependence and Reward Interdependence on Group Problem Solving , 1998 .

[19]  Hal B. Gregersen,et al.  Task interdependence and extrarole behavior : a test of the mediating effects of felt responsibility , 1991 .

[20]  M. Deutsch.  An Experimental Study of the Effects of Co-Operation and Competition upon Group Process , 1949 .

[21]  J. Guthrie,et al.  Group Pay-For-Performance Plans: The Role of Spontaneous Goal Setting , 2000 .

[22]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[23]  David B. Allison,et al.  Relative Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Cooperative, Competitive, and Independent Monetary Incentive Systems , 1993 .

[24]  R. Wood.  Task complexity: Definition of the construct , 1986 .

[25]  P. Ackerman,et al.  Motivation and cognitive abilities: an integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition , 1989 .

[26]  T. Connolly,et al.  Goals, strategy development and task performance: Some limits on the efficacy of goal setting , 1989 .

[27]  M. Deutsch.  A Theory of Co-operation and Competition , 1949 .

[28]  Henk Thierry,et al.  Payment by Results Systems: A Review of Research 1945–1985 , 1987 .

[29]  Gerard H. Seijts,et al.  The effects of proximal and distal goals on performance on a moderately complex task , 1999 .

[30]  M. Kiggundu.  Task interdependence and job design: test of a theory. , 1983, Organizational behavior and human performance.

[31]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Task complexity as a moderator of goal effects: A meta-analysis. , 1987 .