Debugging diversity – a pan‐continental exploration of the potential of terrestrial blood‐feeding leeches as a vertebrate monitoring tool

The use of environmental DNA (eDNA) has become an applicable noninvasive tool with which to obtain information about biodiversity. A subdiscipline of eDNA is iDNA (invertebrate‐derived DNA), where genetic material ingested by invertebrates is used to characterize the biodiversity of the species that served as hosts. While promising, these techniques are still in their infancy, as they have only been explored on limited numbers of samples from only a single or a few different locations. In this study, we investigate the suitability of iDNA extracted from more than 3,000 haematophagous terrestrial leeches as a tool for detecting a wide range of terrestrial vertebrates across five different geographical regions on three different continents. These regions cover almost the full geographical range of haematophagous terrestrial leeches, thus representing all parts of the world where this method might apply. We identify host taxa through metabarcoding coupled with high‐throughput sequencing on Illumina and IonTorrent sequencing platforms to decrease economic costs and workload and thereby make the approach attractive for practitioners in conservation management. We identified hosts in four different taxonomic vertebrate classes: mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians, belonging to at least 42 different taxonomic families. We find that vertebrate blood ingested by haematophagous terrestrial leeches throughout their distribution is a viable source of DNA with which to examine a wide range of vertebrates. Thus, this study provides encouraging support for the potential of haematophagous terrestrial leeches as a tool for detecting and monitoring terrestrial vertebrate biodiversity.

[1]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Towards next‐generation biodiversity assessment using DNA metabarcoding , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[2]  Christophe Boesch,et al.  Carrion fly-derived DNA as a tool for comprehensive and cost-effective assessment of mammalian biodiversity. , 2013, Molecular ecology.

[3]  J. Piñol,et al.  Universal and blocking primer mismatches limit the use of high‐throughput DNA sequencing for the quantitative metabarcoding of arthropods , 2015, Molecular ecology resources.

[4]  C. Kreader.  Relief of amplification inhibition in PCR with bovine serum albumin or T4 gene 32 protein , 1996, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[5]  Bruce D. Patterson,et al.  The Status of the World's Land and Marine Mammals: Diversity, Threat, and Knowledge , 2008, Science.

[6]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Replication levels, false presences and the estimation of the presence/absence from eDNA metabarcoding data , 2015, Molecular ecology resources.

[7]  Matthias Meyer,et al.  Illumina sequencing library preparation for highly multiplexed target capture and sequencing. , 2010, Cold Spring Harbor protocols.

[8]  Dáithí C. Murray,et al.  Scrapheap Challenge: A novel bulk-bone metabarcoding method to investigate ancient DNA in faunal assemblages , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[9]  L. Vigilant,et al.  Targeted detection of mammalian species using carrion fly‐derived DNA , 2015, Molecular ecology resources.

[10]  Alexander F. Auch,et al.  MEGAN analysis of metagenomic data. , 2007, Genome research.

[11]  S. Pääbo,et al.  Molecular coproscopy: dung and diet of the extinct ground sloth Nothrotheriops shastensis. , 1998, Science.

[12]  Douglas W. Yu,et al.  Evidence that the Tibetan fox is an obligate predator of the plateau pika: conservation implications , 2014 .

[13]  S. Giovannoni,et al.  Bias caused by template annealing in the amplification of mixtures of 16S rRNA genes by PCR , 1996, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[14]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  The conservation return on investment from ecological monitoring , 2012 .

[15]  Qing Yang,et al.  Ultra-deep sequencing enables high-fidelity recovery of biodiversity for bulk arthropod samples without PCR amplification , 2013, GigaScience.

[16]  P. Ehrlich,et al.  Global mammal distributions, biodiversity hotspots, and conservation , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  B. Deagle,et al.  Quantification of damage in DNA recovered from highly degraded samples – a case study on DNA in faeces , 2006, Frontiers in Zoology.

[18]  M Thomas P Gilbert,et al.  An invertebrate stomach's view on vertebrate ecology , 2013, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[19]  N. Blom,et al.  The microbiome of New World vultures , 2014, Nature Communications.

[20]  E. Silbergeld.  The Microbiome , 2017, Toxicologic pathology.

[21]  Martin F. Polz,et al.  Bias in Template-to-Product Ratios in Multitemplate PCR , 1998, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[22]  Kristine Bohmann,et al.  DAMe: a toolkit for the initial processing of datasets with PCR replicates of double-tagged amplicons for DNA metabarcoding analyses , 2016, BMC Research Notes.

[23]  J. Beisson,et al.  Paramecium tetraurelia: the renaissance of an early unicellular model. , 2010, Cold Spring Harbor protocols.

[24]  M. Siddall,et al.  Arhynchobdellida (Annelida: Oligochaeta: Hirudinida): phylogenetic relationships and evolution. , 2004, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[25]  N. Rohland,et al.  Molecular analysis of a 11 700‐year‐old rodent midden from the Atacama Desert, Chile , 2002, Molecular ecology.

[26]  J. W. Pendleton,et al.  Surveys of Gene Families Using Polymerase Chain Reaction: PCR Selection and PCR Drift , 1994 .

[27]  Douglas W. Yu,et al.  Quantifying uncertainty of taxonomic placement in DNA barcoding and metabarcoding , 2016, bioRxiv.

[28]  Kristine Bohmann,et al.  Second generation sequencing and morphological faecal analysis reveal unexpected foraging behaviour by Myotis nattereri (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae) in winter , 2014, Frontiers in Zoology.

[29]  Alejandro Oceguera-Figueroa,et al.  On the classification, evolution and biogeography of terrestrial haemadipsoid leeches (Hirudinida: Arhynchobdellida: Hirudiniformes). , 2008, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[30]  P. G. Taylor.  Reproducibility of ancient DNA sequences from extinct Pleistocene fauna. , 1996, Molecular biology and evolution.

[31]  J. M. Elliott,et al.  Leech Biology and Behaviour , 1987 .

[32]  Kate E. Jones,et al.  Ecology and evolution of mammalian biodiversity , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  Quantifying uncertainty of taxonomic placement in DNA barcoding and metabarcoding , 2016 .

[34]  R. Mittermeier,et al.  Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities , 2000, Nature.

[35]  M. Siddall,et al.  Description of a soft‐bodied invertebrate with microcomputed tomography and revision of the genus Chtonobdella (Hirudinea: Haemadipsidae) , 2016 .

[36]  Stinus Lindgreen,et al.  AdapterRemoval: easy cleaning of next-generation sequencing reads , 2012, BMC Research Notes.

[37]  S. Jarman,et al.  Blocking primers to enhance PCR amplification of rare sequences in mixed samples – a case study on prey DNA in Antarctic krill stomachs , 2008, Frontiers in Zoology.

[38]  Douglas W. Yu,et al.  Environmental DNA for wildlife biology and biodiversity monitoring. , 2014, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[39]  E. Willerslev,et al.  Blocking human contaminant DNA during PCR allows amplification of rare mammal species from sedimentary ancient DNA , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[40]  C. Meyer,et al.  The Controversy , 2022 .

[41]  Jonathan P. Bollback,et al.  The Use of Coded PCR Primers Enables High-Throughput Sequencing of Multiple Homolog Amplification Products by 454 Parallel Sequencing , 2007, PloS one.

[42]  Jean-Michel Claverie,et al.  Phylogeny.fr: robust phylogenetic analysis for the non-specialist , 2008, Nucleic Acids Res..

[43]  Douglas W. Yu,et al.  iDNA from terrestrial haematophagous leeches as a wildlife surveying and monitoring tool – prospects, pitfalls and avenues to be developed , 2015, Frontiers in Zoology.

[44]  Hidetoshi Shimodaira.  An approximately unbiased test of phylogenetic tree selection. , 2002, Systematic biology.

[45]  Michael Bunce,et al.  From Benchtop to Desktop: Important Considerations when Designing Amplicon Sequencing Workflows , 2015, PloS one.

[46]  R. Vrijenhoek,et al.  DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. , 1994, Molecular marine biology and biotechnology.

[47]  J. Rutledge,et al.  Normal calves from transfer of biopsied, sexed and vitrified IVP bovine embryos. , 1998, Theriogenology.

[48]  N. Ivanova,et al.  The Role of DNA Barcodes in Understanding and Conservation of Mammal Diversity in Southeast Asia , 2010, PloS one.

[49]  Kristine Bohmann,et al.  Tag jumps illuminated – reducing sequence‐to‐sample misidentifications in metabarcoding studies , 2015, Molecular ecology resources.

[50]  When bugs reveal biodiversity , 2013, Molecular ecology.

[51]  M. Siddall,et al.  Poly-paraphyly of Hirudinidae: many lineages of medicinal leeches , 2009, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[52]  Alain Viari,et al.  ecoPrimers: inference of new DNA barcode markers from whole genome sequence analysis , 2011, Nucleic acids research.

[53]  Gareth Jones,et al.  Taxon‐specific PCR for DNA barcoding arthropod prey in bat faeces , 2011, Molecular ecology resources.

[54]  D. Froese,et al.  Amplicon pyrosequencing late Pleistocene permafrost: the removal of putative contaminant sequences and small‐scale reproducibility , 2013, Molecular ecology resources.

[55]  M. Kristensen,et al.  Identity and diversity of blood meal hosts of biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae: Culicoides Latreille) in Denmark , 2012, Parasites & Vectors.

[56]  M. G. Lorenz,et al.  Use of polymerase chain reaction and electroporation of Escherichia coli to monitor the persistence of extracellular plasmid DNA introduced into natural soils , 1993, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[57]  G. B. Golding,et al.  Antibiotic resistance is ancient , 2011, Nature.

[58]  T. Gregory,et al.  Identifying the last supper: utility of the DNA barcode library for bloodmeal identification in ticks , 2012, Molecular ecology resources.

[59]  Anne-Laure Bañuls,et al.  iDNA screening: Disease vectors as vertebrate samplers , 2017, Molecular ecology.

[60]  C. M. Herr,et al.  Micronanipulation of bovine embryos for sex determination , 1991 .

[61]  Antton Alberdi,et al.  Scrutinizing key steps for reliable metabarcoding of environmental samples , 2018 .

[62]  S. Pääbo,et al.  Ancient DNA: Methodological challenges , 1994, Experientia.

[63]  H. H. Bruun,et al.  Algorithm for post-clustering curation of DNA amplicon data yields reliable biodiversity estimates , 2017, Nature Communications.

[64]  François Pompanon,et al.  An In silico approach for the evaluation of DNA barcodes , 2010, BMC Genomics.

[65]  Matthias F. Wucherer,et al.  Regulation of red fluorescent light emission in a cryptic marine fish , 2014, Frontiers in Zoology.

[66]  Andre Zerger,et al.  Improving biodiversity monitoring , 2012 .

[67]  M. Thomas P. Gilbert,et al.  Screening mammal biodiversity using DNA from leeches , 2012, Current Biology.

[68]  P. Dutton,et al.  Marine turtle mitogenome phylogenetics and evolution. , 2012, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[69]  M. Siddall,et al.  Insights into the evolutionary history of Indo-Pacific bloodfeeding terrestrial leeches (Hirudinida : Arhynchobdellida : Haemadipisdae) , 2010 .