Development and Validation of a Cytogenetic Prognostic Index Predicting Survival in Multiple Myeloma.

PURPOSE The wide heterogeneity in multiple myeloma (MM) outcome is driven mainly by cytogenetic abnormalities. The current definition of high-risk profile is restrictive and oversimplified. To adapt MM treatment to risk, we need to better define a cytogenetic risk classification. To address this issue, we simultaneously examined the prognostic impact of del(17p); t(4;14); del(1p32); 1q21 gain; and trisomies 3, 5, and 21 in a cohort of newly diagnosed patients with MM. METHODS Data were obtained from 1,635 patients enrolled in four trials implemented by the Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome. The oldest collection of data were used for model development and internal validation. For external validation, one of the two independent data sets was used to assess the performance of the model in patients treated with more current regimens. Six cytogenetic abnormalities were identified as clinically relevant, and a prognostic index (PI) that was based on the parameter estimates of the multivariable Cox model was computed for all patients. RESULTS In all data sets, a higher PI was consistently associated with a poor survival outcome. Dependent on the validation cohorts used, hazard ratios for patients in the high-risk category for death were between six and 15 times higher than those of patients in the low-risk category. Among patients with t(4;14) or del(17p), we observed a worse survival in those classified in the high-risk category than in those in the intermediate-risk category. The PI showed good performance for discriminating between patients who died and those who survived (Harrell's concordance index greater than 70%). CONCLUSION The cytogenetic PI improves the classification of newly diagnosed patients with MM in the high-risk group compared with current classifications. These findings may facilitate the development of risk-adapted treatment strategies.

[1]  H. Goldschmidt,et al.  High subclonal fraction of 17p deletion is associated with poor prognosis in multiple myeloma. , 2019, Blood.

[2]  M. Moarii,et al.  Analysis of the genomic landscape of multiple myeloma highlights novel prognostic markers and disease subgroups , 2017, Leukemia.

[3]  S. Tricot,et al.  Combination of t(4;14), del(17p13), del(1p32) and 1q21 gain FISH probes identifies clonal heterogeneity and enhances the detection of adverse cytogenetic profiles in 233 newly diagnosed multiple myeloma , 2017, Molecular Cytogenetics.

[4]  G. Morgan,et al.  Prediction of outcome in newly diagnosed myeloma: a meta-analysis of the molecular profiles of 1905 trial patients , 2017, Leukemia.

[5]  N. Munshi,et al.  Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone with Transplantation for Myeloma , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  M. Mohty,et al.  Understanding the role of hyperdiploidy in myeloma prognosis: which trisomies really matter? , 2015, Blood.

[7]  H. Goldschmidt,et al.  Revised International Staging System for Multiple Myeloma: A Report From International Myeloma Working Group. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  Gordon Cook,et al.  Mutational Spectrum, Copy Number Changes, and Outcome: Results of a Sequencing Study of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Myeloma. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  N. Munshi,et al.  Role of additional chromosomal changes in the prognostic value of t(4;14) and del(17p) in multiple myeloma: the IFM experience. , 2015, Blood.

[10]  C. Vachon,et al.  Racial differences in primary cytogenetic abnormalities in multiple myeloma: a multi-center study , 2015, Blood Cancer Journal.

[11]  C. Vachon,et al.  Racial differences in primary cytogenetic abnormalities in multiple myeloma: a multi-center study , 2015, Blood Cancer Journal.

[12]  B. Pégourié,et al.  Age is a prognostic factor even among patients with multiple myeloma younger than 66 years treated with high-dose melphalan: the IFM experience on 2316 patients , 2014, Haematologica.

[13]  B. Pégourié,et al.  Deletion of the 1p32 region is a major independent prognostic factor in young patients with myeloma: the IFM experience on 1195 patients , 2014, Leukemia.

[14]  H. Goldschmidt,et al.  IMWG consensus on risk stratification in multiple myeloma , 2014, Leukemia.

[15]  Lust,et al.  Trisomies in multiple myeloma: impact on survival in patients with high-risk cytogenetics. , 2012, Blood.

[16]  G. Morgan,et al.  A novel prognostic model in myeloma based on co-segregating adverse FISH lesions and the ISS: analysis of patients treated in the MRC Myeloma IX trial , 2011, Leukemia.

[17]  O. Decaux,et al.  Translocation t(14;16) and multiple myeloma: is it really an independent prognostic factor? , 2011, Blood.

[18]  M. Mohty,et al.  Bortezomib plus dexamethasone is superior to vincristine plus doxorubicin plus dexamethasone as induction treatment prior to autologous stem-cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: results of the IFM 2005-01 phase III trial. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  P. Moreau,et al.  Achievement of at least very good partial response is a simple and robust prognostic factor in patients with multiple myeloma treated with high-dose therapy: long-term analysis of the IFM 99-02 and 99-04 Trials. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  B. Barlogie,et al.  International Myeloma Working Group molecular classification of multiple myeloma: spotlight review , 2009, Leukemia.

[21]  B. Pégourié,et al.  Melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide versus melphalan and prednisone alone or reduced-intensity autologous stem cell transplantation in elderly patients with multiple myeloma (IFM 99–06): a randomised trial , 2007, The Lancet.

[22]  B. Grosbois,et al.  Heterogeneity of t(4;14) in multiple myeloma. Long-term follow-up of 100 cases treated with tandem transplantation in IFM99 trials , 2007, Leukemia.

[23]  R. Bataille,et al.  Genetic abnormalities and survival in multiple myeloma: the experience of the Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome. , 2007, Blood.

[24]  Rafael Fonseca,et al.  Molecular dissection of hyperdiploid multiple myeloma by gene expression profiling. , 2007, Cancer research.

[25]  G. Ahmann,et al.  Prognostic value of chromosome 1q21 gain by fluorescent in situ hybridization and increase CKS1B expression in myeloma , 2006, Leukemia.

[26]  G. Ahmann,et al.  Prognostic factors for hyperdiploid-myeloma: effects of chromosome 13 deletions and IgH translocations , 2006, Leukemia.

[27]  G. Ahmann,et al.  Clinical implications of t(11;14)(q13;q32), t(4;14)(p16.3;q32), and -17p13 in myeloma patients treated with high-dose therapy. , 2005, Blood.

[28]  D. Reece,et al.  The t(4;14) is associated with poor prognosis in myeloma patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplant , 2004, British journal of haematology.

[29]  Bart Barlogie,et al.  Genetics and Cytogenetics of Multiple Myeloma , 2004, Cancer Research.

[30]  M. Rue,et al.  Clinical and biologic implications of recurrent genomic aberrations in myeloma. , 2003, Blood.

[31]  M. Höglund,et al.  Cytogenetic features of multiple myeloma: impact of gender, age, disease phase, culture time, and cytokine stimulation , 2002, European journal of haematology.

[32]  L. Escoda,et al.  Prognostic and biological implications of genetic abnormalities in multiple myeloma undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation: t(4;14) is the most relevant adverse prognostic factor, whereas RB deletion as a unique abnormality is not associated with adverse prognosis , 2007, Leukemia.