Blowing in the Wind: Increasing Copresence with a Virtual Human via Airflow Influence in Augmented Reality

In a social context where two or more interlocutors interact with each other in the same space, one’s sense of copresence with the others is an important factor for the quality of communication and engagement in the interaction. Although augmented reality (AR) technology enables the superposition of virtual humans (VHs) as interlocutors in the real world, the resulting sense of copresence is usually far lower than with a real human interlocutor. In this paper, we describe a human-subject study in which we explored and investigated the effects that subtle multi-modal interaction between the virtual environment and the real world, where a VH and human participants were co-located, can have on copresence. We compared two levels of gradually increased multi-modal interaction: (i) virtual objects being affected by real airflow as commonly experienced with fans in summer, and (ii) a VH showing awareness of this airflow. We chose airflow as one example of an environmental factor that can noticeably affect both the real and virtual worlds, and also cause subtle responses in interlocutors. We hypothesized that our two levels of treatment would increase the sense of being together with the VH gradually, i.e., participants would report higher copresence with airflow influence than without it, and the copresence would be even higher when the VH shows awareness of the airflow. The statistical analysis with the participant-reported copresence scores showed that there was an improvement of the perceived copresence with the VH when both the physical–virtual interactivity via airflow and the VH’s awareness behaviors were present together. As the considered environmental factors are directed at the VH, i.e., they are not part of the direct interaction with the real human, they can provide a reasonably generalizable approach to support copresence in AR beyond the particular use case in the present experiment. CCS Concepts • Human-centered computing → User studies; Mixed / augmented reality; • Computing methodologies → Mixed / aug-

[1]  Jens Allwood,et al.  An activity-based approach to pragmatics , 2000, Abduction, Belief and Context in Dialogue.

[2]  Kangsoo Kim,et al.  The wobbly table: Increased social presence via subtle incidental movement of a real-virtual table , 2016, 2016 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR).

[3]  Kangsoo Kim,et al.  Revisiting Trends in Augmented Reality Research: A Review of the 2nd Decade of ISMAR (2008–2017) , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[4]  Kangsoo Kim,et al.  Does a Digital Assistant Need a Body? The Influence of Visual Embodiment and Social Behavior on the Perception of Intelligent Virtual Agents in AR , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR).

[5]  Louis-Philippe Morency,et al.  A probabilistic multimodal approach for predicting listener backchannels , 2009, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[6]  Kangsoo Kim,et al.  The effects of virtual human's spatial and behavioral coherence with physical objects on social presence in AR , 2017, Comput. Animat. Virtual Worlds.

[7]  Cagatay Basdogan,et al.  An experimental study on the role of touch in shared virtual environments , 2000, TCHI.

[8]  F. Biocca,et al.  Internal Consistency and Reliability of the Networked MindsMeasure of Social Presence , 2004 .

[9]  Shanyang Zhao,et al.  Toward a Taxonomy of Copresence , 2003, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[10]  Gerd Bruder,et al.  Effects of Unaugmented Periphery and Vibrotactile Feedback on Proxemics with Virtual Humans in AR , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[11]  Mel Slater,et al.  Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  Kangsoo Kim,et al.  A Systematic Survey of 15 Years of User Studies Published in the Intelligent Virtual Agents Conference , 2018, IVA.

[13]  J. Blascovich Social influence within immersive virtual environments , 2002 .

[14]  Crystal L. Hoyt,et al.  Immersive Virtual Environment Technology as a Methodological Tool for Social Psychology , 2002 .

[15]  J. Loomis,et al.  Interpersonal Distance in Immersive Virtual Environments , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[16]  Benjamin Lok,et al.  Exploring Agent Physicality and Social Presence for Medical Team Training , 2013, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[17]  Takahiro Kawabe,et al.  Gaze-cueing of attention distorts visual space , 2013 .

[18]  Mel Slater,et al.  The impact of avatar realism and eye gaze control on perceived quality of communication in a shared immersive virtual environment , 2003, CHI '03.

[19]  Bilge Mutlu,et al.  MACH: my automated conversation coach , 2013, UbiComp.

[20]  Charles E. Hughes,et al.  The Potential of Simulated Environments in Teacher Education , 2014 .

[21]  Sean Andrist,et al.  Looking Coordinated: Bidirectional Gaze Mechanisms for Collaborative Interaction with Virtual Characters , 2017, CHI.

[22]  Kangsoo Kim,et al.  Exploring the Impact of Environmental Effects on Social Presence with a Virtual Human , 2016, IVA.

[23]  David DeVault,et al.  Detection and Computational Analysis of Psychological Signals Using a Virtual Human Interviewing Agent , 2014 .

[24]  Gerard Jounghyun Kim,et al.  Design and evaluation of a wind display for virtual reality , 2004, VRST '04.

[25]  Felix Hülsmann,et al.  Wind and warmth in virtual reality: implementation and evaluation , 2014, VRIC.

[26]  Neff Walker,et al.  Evaluating the importance of multi-sensory input on memory and the sense of presence in virtual environments , 1999, Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality (Cat. No. 99CB36316).

[27]  E. Goffman Behavior in public places : notes on the social organization of gatherings , 1964 .

[28]  Robert J. K. Jacob,et al.  The VR Scooter: Wind and Tactile Feedback Improve User Performance , 2006, 3D User Interfaces (3DUI'06).

[29]  Arjun Nagendran,et al.  Expectancy Violations Related to a Virtual Human ’ s Joint Gaze Behavior in Real-Virtual Human Interactions , .

[30]  Christian Geiger,et al.  Poster: Design and evaluation of 3D content with wind output , 2009, 2009 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces.