Adhesion Prevention During Laparotomy: Long-Term Follow-up of a Randomized Clinical Trial

Objective:The objective of the study was to determine the long-term effect of the use of a hyaluronic acid-carboxymethylcellulose membrane (Seprafilm) on the incidence of adhesions and subsequent small-bowel obstruction and chronic abdominal complaints after colorectal surgery (Hartmann's procedure). Background:Adhesions occur frequently after abdominal surgery and are the most common cause of bowel obstruction, chronic abdominal pain, and infertility. The risk for adhesion-related readmission in the first 10 years after colorectal surgery is as high as 30%. To reduce the formation of adhesions, a mechanical barrier composed of hyaluronic acid and carboxymethylcellulose was developed, to prevent adherence of tissues after abdominal surgery. Long-term results concerning the incidence of small-bowel obstruction and chronic abdominal pain are lacking. Methods:Between April 1996 and September 1998, 71 patients requiring Hartmann's procedure for sigmoid diverticulitis or obstructed rectosigmoid were randomized to either intraperitoneal placement of Seprafilm under the midline and in the pelvis or as a control. Direct visual evaluation of the incidence and severity of adhesions was performed laparoscopically in 42 patients at second-stage surgery for restoration of the continuity of the colon. The results of this study were published in 2002. In 2006, the patients' general practitioners were interviewed by means of a questionnaire concerning their patients' health. The patients who were still alive were interviewed and asked to fill out 2 questionnaires concerning pain and quality of life (VAS-pain score, EQ-5D, and SF-36). In 2009, the medical records of the patients were evaluated for adhesion-related hospital re-admissions. Results:Of the 42 evaluated patients, 35 (16 in the Seprafilm group, 19 in the control group) could be enrolled in the long-term follow-up. Median follow-up was 126 months (range 41–148) for the Seprafilm group and 128 months (range 49–149) months for the control group. Incidence of chronic (3 months or longer existing) abdominal complaints was significantly lower in the Seprafilm group compared with controls (35.3% vs. 77.8%, respectively; P = 0.018). Incidence of small-bowel obstruction showed no significant difference in favor of the Seprafilm group; no small-bowel obstructions occurred in the Seprafilm group, whereas in the control group 2 cases of small-bowel obstruction were found to have occurred. Evaluation of the quality of life questionnaires did not reveal significant differences between the 2 groups. Conclusions:In Hartmann's procedure, Seprafilm placement does not provide protection against small-bowel obstruction. Incidence of chronic abdominal complaints is significantly lower after use of Seprafilm.

[1]  Y. Mohri,et al.  Efficacy and Safety of Seprafilm: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2008, World Journal of Surgery.

[2]  P. Stalmeier,et al.  The Dutch tariff: results and arguments for an effective design for national EQ-5D valuation studies. , 2006, Health economics.

[3]  W. Hop,et al.  Comparison of laparoscopic and mini incision open donor nephrectomy: single blind, randomised controlled clinical trial , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  J. Bennek,et al.  Experimental Study Evaluating the Effect of a Barrier Method on Postoperative Intraabdominal Adhesions , 2006, Digestive Diseases and Sciences.

[5]  A. Darzi,et al.  Reduction in Adhesive Small-Bowel Obstruction by Seprafilm® Adhesion Barrier After Intestinal Resection , 2006, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[6]  M. Parker,et al.  The SCAR‐3 study: 5‐year adhesion‐related readmission risk following lower abdominal surgical procedures , 2005, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[7]  Paul F. M. Krabbe,et al.  Kwaliteit van leven meten in economische evaluaties: het Nederlands EQ-5D-tarief , 2005 .

[8]  H. Ikeuchi,et al.  Bioresorbable Hyaluronate-Carboxymethylcellulose Membrane (Seprafilm) in Surgery for Rectal Carcinoma: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial , 2005, Surgery Today.

[9]  S. Pekmezci̇,et al.  Seprafilm may ease colostomy reversal. , 2004, Archives of surgery.

[10]  H. Lippert,et al.  Emergency operation in carcinomas of the left colon: value of Hartmann’s procedure , 2004, Techniques in Coloproctology.

[11]  S. Hazinedaroglu,et al.  An Assessment of the Effects of Two Types of Bioresorbable Barriers to Prevent Postoperative Intra-Abdominal Adhesions in Rats , 2004, Surgery Today.

[12]  Z. Cohen,et al.  A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter, Controlled Study of the Safety of Seprafilm® Adhesion Barrier in Abdominopelvic Surgery of the Intestine , 2003, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[13]  G. Saed,et al.  Seprafilm (modified hyaluronic acid and carboxymethylcellulose) acts as a physical barrier. , 2003, Fertility and sterility.

[14]  J. Jeekel,et al.  Abdominal adhesions: intestinal obstruction, pain, and infertility , 2003, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[15]  W. Richards,et al.  Results after laparoscopic lysis of adhesions and placement of seprafilm for intractable abdominal pain , 2003, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[16]  L. Stassen,et al.  Fewer Intraperitoneal Adhesions With Use of Hyaluronic Acid–Carboxymethylcellulose Membrane: A Randomized Clinical Trial , 2002, Annals of surgery.

[17]  M. Parker,et al.  Small bowel obstruction due to postoperative adhesions: treatment patterns and associated costs in 110 hospital admissions. , 2001, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[18]  L. Holmdahl Making and covering of surgical footprints , 1999, The Lancet.

[19]  M. Parker,et al.  Adhesion-related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort study , 1999, The Lancet.

[20]  B. Gandek,et al.  Testing Dutch and French translations of the SF-36 Health Survey among Belgian angina patients. , 1998, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[21]  M. Schäfer,et al.  Comparison of Adhesion Formation in Open and Laparoscopic Surgery , 1998, Digestive Surgery.

[22]  H. Ellis The clinical significance of adhesions: focus on intestinal obstruction. , 1997, The European journal of surgery. Supplement. : = Acta chirurgica. Supplement.

[23]  J. Jeekel,et al.  Foreign material in postoperative adhesions. , 1996, Annals of surgery.

[24]  M. Snoj Pathogenesis and prevention of adhesion formation , 1995, The British journal of surgery.

[25]  H. Ellis,et al.  Intestinal obstruction from adhesions--how big is the problem? , 1990, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[26]  H. Ellis The cause and prevention of postoperative intraperitoneal adhesions. , 1971, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.