Path tortuosity and the permeability of roads and trails to wolf movement

Few studies have examined the effects of human development on fine-scale movement behavior, yet understanding animal movement through increasingly human-dominated landscapes is essential for the persistence of many wild populations, especially wary species. In mountainous areas, roads and trails may be particularly deserving of study because they are concentrated in the valley bottoms where they can impede animal movement both across and between valleys. In this study, we tracked wolf (Canis lupus) movement in the snow for two winters in Jasper National Park, Alberta, Canada to examine how wolves navigate through or around human-use features. We quantified the effects of human development and topography on the tortuosity of wolf paths and then tested the permeability of roads, trails, and a railway line to wolf movement by comparing the frequency with which actual wolf paths and a null model of random paths crossed these features. Wolf path tortuosity increased near high-use trails, within areas of high-trail and road density, near predation sites, and in rugged terrain. Wolves crossed all roads, trails, and the railway line 9.7% less often than expected, but avoided crossing high-use roads more than low-use trails. Surprisingly, trails affected movement behavior of wolves equally, if not more, than roads. These results suggest that although roads and trails in this study were not absolute barriers to wolf movement, they altered wolf movements across their territories.

[1]  Rodney X. Sturdivant,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression: Hosmer/Applied Logistic Regression , 2005 .

[2]  C. C. Clair.  Comparative Permeability of Roads, Rivers, and Meadows to Songbirds in Banff National Park , 2003 .

[3]  L. Brooker,et al.  Dispersal and population dynamics of the blue-breasted fairy-wren, Malurus pulcherrimus, in fragmented habitat in the Western Australian wheatbelt , 2002 .

[4]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Gap crossing by chipmunks: an experimental test of landscape connectivity , 2002 .

[5]  M. Villard,et al.  Permeability of three boreal forest landscape types to bird movements as determined from experimental translocations , 2002 .

[6]  C. Patrick Doncaster,et al.  Roads as barriers to movement for hedgehogs , 2002 .

[7]  A. Genz,et al.  On the Numerical Availability of Multiple Comparison Procedures , 2001 .

[8]  Elizabeth E. Crone,et al.  EDGE-MEDIATED DISPERSAL BEHAVIOR IN A PRAIRIE BUTTERFLY , 2001 .

[9]  M. Fortin,et al.  INFLUENCE OF FOREST COVER ON THE MOVEMENTS OF FOREST BIRDS: A HOMING EXPERIMENT , 2001 .

[10]  F. J. Singer,et al.  Responses of Desert Bighorn Sheep to Increased Human Recreation , 2001 .

[11]  Stan Boutin,et al.  Avoidance of Industrial Development by Woodland Caribou , 2001 .

[12]  S. R. Jammalamadaka,et al.  Topics in Circular Statistics , 2001 .

[13]  D. Bates,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS , 2001 .

[14]  Marie-Josée Fortin,et al.  Understanding avian responses to forest boundaries: a case study with chickadee winter flocks , 2000 .

[15]  Patrick A. Zollner,et al.  Comparing the landscape level perceptual abilities of forest sciurids in fragmented agricultural landscapes* , 2000, Landscape Ecology.

[16]  Michael J. Wisdom,et al.  Elk Distribution and Modeling in Relation to Roads , 2000 .

[17]  J. Roland,et al.  ALPINE PARNASSIUS BUTTERFLY DISPERSAL: EFFECTS OF LANDSCAPE AND POPULATION SIZE , 2000 .

[18]  J. A. Schaefer,et al.  Caribou movement as a correlated random walk , 2000, Oecologia.

[19]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2000 .

[20]  C. Frissell,et al.  Review of Ecological Effects of Roads on Terrestrial and Aquatic Communities , 2000 .

[21]  A. Clevenger,et al.  Factors Influencing the Effectiveness of Wildlife Underpasses in Banff National Park, Alberta, Canada , 2000 .

[22]  R. Forman,et al.  Estimate of the Area Affected Ecologically by the Road System in the United States , 2000 .

[23]  L. Brooker,et al.  Animal Dispersal in Fragmented Habitat: Measuring Habitat Connectivity, Corridor Use, and Dispersal Mortality , 1999 .

[24]  A. King,et al.  Dispersal success on fractal landscapes: a consequence of lacunarity thresholds , 1999, Landscape Ecology.

[25]  David J. Mladenoff,et al.  Predicting gray wolf landscape recolonization: logistic regression models vs. new field data , 1999 .

[26]  A. Desrochers,et al.  Winter Responses of Forest Birds to Habitat Corridors and Gaps , 1998 .

[27]  Marco Musiani,et al.  Speed and actual distances travelled by radiocollared wolves in Białowieża Primeval Forest (Poland) , 1998 .

[28]  V. Nams,et al.  How red-backed voles find habitat patches , 1998 .

[29]  C. Schultz,et al.  Dispersal Behavior and Its Implications for Reserve Design in a Rare Oregon Butterfly , 1998 .

[30]  Donald E. Spalinger,et al.  Foraging behavior of browsing ruminants in a heterogeneous landscape , 1998, Landscape Ecology.

[31]  André Desrochers,et al.  Gap Crossing Decisions by Forest Songbirds during the Post‐Fledging Period , 1997 .

[32]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Landscape-level perceptual abilities in white-footed mice : perceptual range and the detection of forested habitat , 1997 .

[33]  P. Stapp,et al.  Response of Deer Mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) to shrubs in shortgrass prairie : linking small-scale movements and the spatial distribution of individuals , 1997 .

[34]  J. Bascompte,et al.  Fractals and search paths in mammals , 1997, Landscape Ecology.

[35]  Bruce T. Milne,et al.  Detecting Critical Scales in Fragmented Landscapes , 1997 .

[36]  Hans R. Zuuring,et al.  Relationships among grizzly bears, roads and habitat in the Swan Mountains, Montana , 1996 .

[37]  L. Ruggiero,et al.  Resilience and conservation of large carnivores in the Rocky Mountains , 1996 .

[38]  Paul C. Paquet,et al.  Conservation Biology and Carnivore Conservation in the Rocky Mountains , 1996 .

[39]  T. O. Crist,et al.  Critical Thresholds in Species' Responses to Landscape Structure , 1995 .

[40]  T. Miyatake,et al.  Dispersal of male sweetpotato weevils (Coleoptera : Curculionidae) in fields with or without sweet potato plants , 1995 .

[41]  R. Haight,et al.  A Regional Landscape Analysis and Prediction of Favorable Gray Wolf Habitat in the Northern Great Lakes Region , 1995 .

[42]  John A. Wiens,et al.  Fractal patterns of insect movement in microlandscape mosaics , 1995 .

[43]  P. Turchin,et al.  Influence of host-plant density and male harassment on the distribution of female Euphydryas anicia (Nymphalidae) , 1989, Oecologia.

[44]  R. Thiel,et al.  Relationship between Road Densities and Wolf Habitat Suitability in Wisconsin , 1985 .

[45]  Claudio Agostinelli,et al.  circular: Circular Statistics, from "Topics in circular Statistics" (2001) S. Rao Jammalamadaka and A. SenGupta, World Scientific. , 2004 .

[46]  Brian D. Ripley,et al.  Modern Applied Statistics with S Fourth edition , 2002 .

[47]  Jesse Whittington,et al.  Movement of wolves (Canis lupus) in response to human development in Jasper National Park, Alberta , 2002 .

[48]  A. K. Stuart-Smith,et al.  Distribution of Caribou and Wolves in Relation to Linear Corridors , 2000 .

[49]  O. Kindvall.  Dispersal in a metapopulation of the bush cricket, Metrioptera bicolor (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) , 1999 .

[50]  Robert Serrouya,et al.  Permeability of the Trans-Canada highway to Black Bear movements in the Bow River Valley of Banff National Park , 1999 .

[51]  P. Turchin.  Quantitative Analysis Of Movement , 1998 .

[52]  John A. Wiens,et al.  Animal movement in heterogeneous landscapes : an experiment with Eleodes beetles in shortgrass prairie , 1992 .

[53]  William J. Paul,et al.  WOLF DISTRIBUTION AND ROAD DENSITY IN MINNESOTA , 1988 .