The role of “chirp” identification in duplex perception

Duplex perception occurs when the phonetically distinguishing transitions of a syllable are presented to one ear and the rest of the syllable (the “base”) is simultaneously presented to the other ear. Subjects report hearing both a nonspeech “chirp” and a speech syllable correctly cued by the transitions. In two experiments, we compared phonetic identification of intact syllables, duplex percepts, isolated transitions, and bases. In both experiments, subjects were able to identify the phonetic information encoded into isolated transitions in the absence of an appropriate syllabic context. Also, there was no significant difference in phonetic identification of isolated transitions and duplex percepts. Finally, in the second experiment, the category boundaries from identification of isolated transitions and duplex percepts were not significantly different from each other. However, both boundaries were statistically different from the category boundary for intact syllables. Taken together, these results suggest that listeners do not need to perceptually integrate F2 transitions or F2 and F3 transition pairs with the base in duplex perception. Rather, it appears that listeners identify the chirps as speech without reference to the base.

[1]  M. Studdert-Kennedy.  The emergence of phonetic structure , 1981, Cognition.

[2]  Thomas D. Carrell,et al.  Onset spectra versus formant transitions as cues to place of articulation , 1980 .

[3]  B. Repp.  Phonetic trading relations and context effects : new experimental evidence for a speech mode of perception , 1982 .

[4]  J. Cutting.  Auditory and linguistic processes in speech perception: inferences from six fusions in dichotic listening. , 1976, Psychological review.

[5]  T. C. Rand,et al.  Dichotic release from masking for speech , 1974 .

[6]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  The perceptual classification of speech , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  A M Liberman,et al.  Duplex perception of cues for stop consonants: Evidence for a phonetic mode , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  M E Schouten,et al.  The case against a speech mode of perception. , 1980, Acta psychologica.

[9]  M. Studdert-Kennedy,et al.  Stop-consonant recognition: Release bursts and formant transitions as functionally equivalent, context-dependent cues , 1977 .

[10]  Terry G. Halwes,et al.  Discrimination in speech and nonspeech modes , 1971 .

[11]  A. Liberman.  On Finding That Speech Is Special , 1982 .

[12]  Alvin M. Liberman,et al.  The Grammars of Speech and Language. , 1970 .

[13]  D B Pisoni,et al.  Some experiments on perceptual learning of mirror-image acoustic patterns , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  B H Repp,et al.  Duplex perception: Confirmation of fusion , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Speech perception without traditional speech cues. , 1981, Science.

[16]  A M Liberman,et al.  Perception of the speech code. , 1967, Psychological review.

[17]  Catherine T. Best,et al.  Perceptual equivalence of acoustic cues in speech and nonspeech perception , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  Dennis H. Klatt,et al.  Software for a cascade/parallel formant synthesizer , 1980 .

[19]  J. Sawusch,et al.  Some Stages of Processing in Speech Perception , 1975 .