Comment on “Global Correlations in Tropical Tree Species Richness and Abundance Reject Neutrality”

Ricklefs and Renner (Reports, 27 January 2012, p. 464) showed correlations of species richness and individual abundance within families across continents and claimed that neutral theory predicts no such correlation. However, they did not substantiate this claim quantitatively with a neutral model. Here, we show that neutral theory can be consistent with these correlations and, consequently, that the correlations alone cannot reject neutrality.

[1]  R. Ricklefs.  Naturalists, Natural History, and the Nature of Biological Diversity , 2012, The American Naturalist.

[2]  Rampal S Etienne,et al.  A dispersal-limited sampling theory for species and alleles. , 2005, Ecology letters.

[3]  D. Kendall.  On the Generalized "Birth-and-Death" Process , 1948 .

[4]  S. Nee.  The neutral theory of biodiversity: do the numbers add up? , 2005 .

[5]  Rampal S. Etienne,et al.  A new sampling formula for neutral biodiversity , 2005 .

[6]  E. Leigh,et al.  Neutral theory: a historical perspective , 2007, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[7]  Jérôme Chave,et al.  A Spatially Explicit Neutral Model of β-Diversity in Tropical Forests , 2002 .

[8]  R. Ricklefs.  The unified neutral theory of biodiversity: do the numbers add up? , 2006, Ecology.

[9]  R. Ricklefs,et al.  Global Correlations in Tropical Tree Species Richness and Abundance Reject Neutrality , 2012, Science.

[10]  R. Ricklefs,et al.  A comment on Hubbell's zero‐sum ecological drift model , 2003 .

[11]  S. Hubbell,et al.  The case for ecological neutral theory. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[12]  S. Hubbell,et al.  The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography at age ten. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[13]  A. Ostling.  Large-scale spatial synchrony and the stability of forest biodiversity revisited , 2012 .

[14]  Rampal S. Etienne,et al.  The Neutral—Niche Debate: A Philosophical Perspective , 2012, Acta Biotheoretica.