Digital rhetoric and global literacies: Communication modes and digital practices in the networked world

Insofar as algorithms are digital problem-solving operations that follow a set of rules or processes to arrive at a result, they are constrained by the rules that determine their parameters for operating. While an algorithm can only operate according to its instructions, however, the potential rules that might govern an algorithm are inexhaustible. An algorithm’s design thus makes rhetorical choices that privilege the importance of some information or desired outcomes over others. This chapter argues for a way of thinking about algorithmic rhetoric as macro-, meso-, and micro-rhetorical. Along these lines, it would be beneficial to think more about algorithms as digital rhetorics with terrific power to sway what counts as knowledge, truth, and material reality in the everyday lives of people across an astonishing range of global communities in the twenty-first century. THE QUINTESSENTIAL DIGITAL RHETORIC Suppose that, as I was typing this sentence, I’d misspelled the word “misspelled.” It wouldn’t much have mattered. No sooner would the wrong letters have materialized on my laptop’s screen than they would have morphed at once into the accepted, proper spelling. This phenomenon is called auto-correction, and it’s a common feature now of most all word processing software, from text messaging on a cell phone to plonking keys on a computer. Auto-correction—which fixes common spelling or grammatical errors when you type—and auto-completion—a related function that predicts the word or phrase you’re typing so to spare you the Herculean labor of having to type the rest yourself—are now commonplace on virtually all digital interfaces, whether conducting a web search, writing an email, or editing source code. These technologies are powered by algorithms: those often hidden sets of instructions that intervene in organizing our world in astonishing ways. Chris Ingraham University of Colorado at Boulder, USA DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-4916-3.ch003

[1]  L. Bitzer The Rhetorical Situation. , 1968 .

[2]  M. Castells The New Public Sphere: Global Civil Society, Communication Networks, and Global Governance , 2008 .

[3]  Modern dogma and the rhetoric of assent , 1974 .

[4]  J. Durlak The Language of New Media , 2002 .

[5]  Geoffrey Baym,et al.  Philosophies and Philosophic Issues in Communication, 1995–2004 , 2004 .

[6]  Richard L. Johannesen,et al.  Language is sermonic , 1970 .

[7]  Jean-Luc Chabert,et al.  A history of algorithms: from the pebble to the microchip , 1999 .

[8]  Louis Althusser,et al.  Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses , 2007 .

[9]  Ian Bogost,et al.  Persuasive Games: The Expressive Power of Videogames , 2007 .

[10]  W. Ong,et al.  Orality and literacy : the technologizing of the word , 1982 .

[11]  Midhat J. Gazalé,et al.  Gnomon: From Pharaohs to Fractals , 1999 .

[12]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[13]  Nathan R. Johnson Information Infrastructure as Rhetoric: Tools for Analysis , 2012 .

[14]  James A. Anderson,et al.  Communication Theory: Epistemological Foundations , 1996 .

[15]  J F Thaulow,et al.  [About communication]. , 1999, Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke.

[16]  J. Ackerman,et al.  The Public Work of Rhetoric: Citizen-Scholars and Civic Engagement , 2013 .

[17]  The Net Effect: Romanticism, Capitalism, and the Internet , 2010 .

[18]  T. Farrell The Weight of Rhetoric: Studies in Cultural Delirium , 2008, Philosophy & Rhetoric.

[19]  Simon Springer,et al.  A Brief History of Neoliberalism , 2007 .

[20]  Bradley Dilger,et al.  From A to A: Keywords of Markup , 2010 .

[21]  Janet M. Atwill Rhetoric Reclaimed: Aristotle and the Liberal Arts Tradition , 1998 .

[22]  John MacCormick,et al.  Nine Algorithms That Changed the Future: The Ingenious Ideas That Drive Today's Computers , 2012 .

[23]  Gerard A. Hauser,et al.  Vernacular Voices: The Rhetoric of Publics and Public Spheres , 1999 .

[24]  Cicero,et al.  On the Ideal Orator , 2001 .

[25]  M. Mcnamee,et al.  A Rhetoric of Motives , 1951 .

[26]  Stephen Ramsay,et al.  Reading Machines: Toward an Algorithmic Criticism , 2011 .