The futility index. An approach to the cost-effective termination of randomized clinical trials.

Although the randomized clinical trial is recognized as the method of choice for evaluating therapeutic innovations, it is often enormously expensive--in some instances, as a result of the unnecessary continuation of a trial destined to conclude that an innovation is not superior to standard therapy. Although most large clinical trials in which results evolve over time are monitored for early evidence of efficacy or toxicity, trials are rarely terminated because the probability of a positive result regarding the value of the innovation has become low. This paper discusses the issues involved in the monitoring and early termination of long-term clinical trials and describes the futility index, a probabilistic basis for early termination of trials of innovative therapy when the accumulated data imply small probability of success. Utilization of the futility index in the management of clinical trials of innovations can be of value in reducing, at slight loss of power, the number of unproductive studies carried to completion, thereby creating new opportunities for more effective use of limited resources.

[1]  D. Siegmund Estimation following sequential tests , 1978 .

[2]  S. Pocock Group sequential methods in the design and analysis of clinical trials , 1977 .

[3]  B. Barnes The Coronary Drug Project , 1972 .

[4]  Peter Armitage,et al.  RESTRICTED SEQUENTIAL PROCEDURES , 1957 .

[5]  P. Armitage Sequential Medical Trials , 1961, Biomedicine / [publiee pour l'A.A.I.C.I.G.].

[6]  J. Lock,et al.  Furosemide promotes patent ductus arteriosus in premature infants with the respiratory-distress syndrome. , 1983, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  J Cornfield,et al.  The Bayesian outlook and its application. , 1969, Biometrics.

[8]  David R. Cox,et al.  Regression models and life tables (with discussion , 1972 .

[9]  F. J. Anscombe Sequential Medical Trials , 1963 .

[10]  P. Armitage,et al.  Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. I. Introduction and design. , 1976, British Journal of Cancer.

[11]  Anastasios A. Tsiatis,et al.  Repeated Significance Testing for a General Class of Statistics Used in Censored Survival Analysis , 1982 .

[12]  M. Pike,et al.  Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. analysis and examples. , 1977, British Journal of Cancer.

[13]  Eric V. Slud,et al.  Two-Sample Repeated Significance Tests Based on the Modified Wilcoxon Statistic , 1982 .

[14]  D L DeMets,et al.  An aid to data monitoring in long-term clinical trials. , 1982, Controlled clinical trials.

[15]  J. Ware,et al.  Randomized clinical trials. Perspectives on some recent ideas. , 1976, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  C. Meinert,et al.  A study of the effects of hypoglycemic agents on vascular complications in patients with adult-onset diabetes. II. Mortality results. , 1970, Diabetes.

[17]  David L. DeMets,et al.  Group sequential methods for clinical trials with a one-sided hypothesis , 1980 .

[18]  J. Lewis,et al.  Multicentre post-infarction trial of propranolol in 49 hospitals in the United Kingdom, Italy, and Yugoslavia. , 1980, British heart journal.

[19]  P. O'Brien,et al.  A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials. , 1979, Biometrics.

[20]  K. K. Lan,et al.  Discrete sequential boundaries for clinical trials , 1983 .

[21]  D. DeMets,et al.  Fundamentals of Clinical Trials , 1982 .

[22]  Roger A. Renfrew,et al.  Lipid Research Clinics Program. , 1984, JAMA.