A Design Methodology of Multi-level Digital Twins

This paper proposes a design methodology of Digital Twins enabling multi-level simulation of equipment in a manufacturing plant. In this context, the Digital Twin covers a central role where it can perform analysis of the current state of the plant and, more importantly, prediction regarding its future state. This requires the use of complex models for all the nodes that compose the entire production, to obtain a more accurate estimation of future equipment states. Furthermore, most of the commercial tools provided by different vendors do not consider this dimension of the problem and allows to perform simulations of the plant with a very high level of abstraction, or with the use of statistical approximation. On the other hand, several physical process simulators allow to model and simulate single equipment, but without considering the production line perspective. Multi-Level modeling considers different levels of abstraction of the same model, allowing to switch from a model to another. This paper proposes a design flow methodology based on multi-level approach, that allows to obtain a unique environment where physical and production simulators are integrated automatically. The entire design flow is validated with a real use case scenario. The obtained results show different simulation strategies using multi-level approach with different synchronization granularity.

[1]  Stefano Centomo,et al.  From Multi-Level to Abstract-Based Simulation of a Production Line , 2019, 2019 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE).

[2]  Paul F. Reynolds,et al.  Consistency maintenance in multiresolution simulation , 1997, TOMC.

[3]  Andreas Junghanns,et al.  Functional Mockup Interface 2.0: The Standard for Tool independent Exchange of Simulation Models , 2012 .

[4]  Carlos Eduardo Pereira,et al.  Digital Twin Data Modeling with AutomationML and a Communication Methodology for Data Exchange , 2016 .

[5]  Rainer Drath,et al.  Industrie 4.0: Hit or Hype? [Industry Forum] , 2014, IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine.

[6]  R. Drath,et al.  The system-independent data exchange format CAEX for supporting an automatic configuration of a production monitoring and control system , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics.

[7]  Rainer Drath,et al.  AutomationML - the glue for seamless automation engineering , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation.

[8]  Dimitris Mourtzis,et al.  Simulation in Manufacturing: Review and Challenges , 2014 .

[9]  Michele Germani,et al.  Cyber-physical system integration for industry 4.0: Modelling and simulation of an induction heating process for aluminium-steel molds in footwear soles manufacturing , 2017, 2017 IEEE 3rd International Forum on Research and Technologies for Society and Industry (RTSI).

[10]  Sigrid Wenzel,et al.  Coupled Simulation of Energy and Material Flow using Plant Simulation and MATLAB Simulink , 2017, Simul. Notes Eur..

[11]  Ján Vachálek,et al.  The digital twin of an industrial production line within the industry 4.0 concept , 2017, 2017 21st International Conference on Process Control (PC).

[12]  Bernhard Wally,et al.  IEC 62264-2 for AutomationML , 2018 .

[13]  Wilhelm Dangelmaier,et al.  Method for simulation state mapping between discrete event material flow models of different level of detail , 2011, Proceedings of the 2011 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC).