The value of combining qualitative and quantitative approaches in nursing research by means of method triangulation.

AIM The article contributes to the theoretical discussion of the epistemological grounds of triangulation in nursing research. BACKGROUND In nursing research, the combination of qualitative and quantitative methods is being used increasingly. The attempt to relate different kinds of data through triangulation of different methods is a challenging task as data derived through different methodologies are viewed as incommensurable. CONTENT Epistemological questions become a vital issue in triangulation of different methods, as qualitative and quantitative methods are built on philosophical differences in the structure and confirmation of knowledge. The epistemology of nursing is manifold, complex and multifarious in character. Contemporary nursing research should be developed on the bases of an epistemology that reflects this multiplicity. The benefits and problems of triangulation are discussed on basis of an epistemological position that acknowledges the need for various types of knowledge and that does not attempt to rank them in a hierarchical order or place different values on them. CONCLUSION We conclude that the complexity and diversity of reality provides the ontological basis for an alternative epistemological position. The various methods used should be recognized as springing from different epistemological traditions which, when combined, add new perspectives to the phenomenon under investigation. The different types of knowledge should not be seen as ranked, but as equally valid and necessary to obtain a richer and more comprehensive picture of the issue under investigation.

[1]  M. Little,et al.  The Relationship between qualitative and quantitative approaches in Social Policy Research , 1992 .

[2]  Jacquelyn C. Campbell,et al.  Combining stories and numbers: a methodologic approach for a critical nursing science. , 1998, ANS. Advances in nursing science.

[3]  Nigel Fielding,et al.  Linking data: the articulation of qualitative and quantitative methods in social research , 1986 .

[4]  C. Tanner,et al.  Expertise in Nursing Practice: Caring, Clinical Judgment and Ethics , 1996 .

[5]  Thomas A. Schwandt.  Qualitative Inquiry: A Dictionary of Terms , 1997 .

[6]  R. Foster,et al.  Addressing Epistemologic and Practical Issues in Multimethod Research: A Procedure for Conceptual Triangulation , 1997, ANS. Advances in nursing science.

[7]  C. Tishelman,et al.  Research on Risk and Risk in Research: Theoretical and Practical Experiences from a Multidisciplinary Study on Cervical Cancer Screening in Urban Sweden , 1999, Qualitative health research.

[8]  K. Benzies,et al.  Symbolic interactionism as a theoretical perspective for multiple method research. , 2001, Journal of advanced nursing.

[9]  T. Jick.  Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action. , 1979 .

[10]  P. Kornguth,et al.  Effects of Force, Race, and Coping Style on Pain During Patient-Controlled Mammography , 1993 .

[11]  K. Hunt,et al.  Gender differences in health: are things really as simple as they seem? , 1996, Social science & medicine.

[12]  V A Thurmond,et al.  The point of triangulation. , 2001, Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing.

[13]  J. Fontana.  The Emergence of the Person-Environment Interaction in a Descriptive Study of Vigor in Heart Failure , 1996, ANS. Advances in nursing science.

[14]  T. Cook,et al.  Beyond qualitative versus quantitative methods , 1979 .

[15]  K. Howe.  Against the Quantitative-Qualitative Incompatibility Thesis or Dogmas Die Hard , 1988 .

[16]  F. Shih.  Triangulation in nursing research: issues of conceptual clarity and purpose. , 1998, Journal of advanced nursing.

[17]  J M Morse,et al.  Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. , 1991, Nursing research.

[18]  S. Harding.  Whose Science? Whose Knowledge?: Thinking from Women's Lives , 1993 .

[19]  E. Guba,et al.  Competing paradigms in qualitative research. , 1994 .

[20]  The use of across-method triangulation in the study of sleep concerns in healthy older adults. , 1993, ANS. Advances in nursing science.

[21]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and Discriminant Validity by the Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix,” Psychological Bulletin (2), March, pp. . , 1959 .

[22]  M Sandelowski,et al.  Combining qualitative and quantitative sampling, data collection, and analysis techniques in mixed-method studies. , 2000, Research in nursing & health.

[23]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  N. Denzin.  The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods , 1977 .

[25]  C. Begley,et al.  Using triangulation in nursing research. , 1996, Journal of advanced nursing.

[26]  D. Oakley,et al.  Combining qualitative with quantitative approaches to study contraceptive pill use. , 1999, Journal of women's health.

[27]  C. Seale.  Quality in Qualitative Research , 1999 .

[28]  E. Murphy,et al.  Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature. , 1998, Health technology assessment.

[29]  Dagfinn Føllesdal,et al.  The Status of Rationality Assumptions in Interpretation and in the Explanation of Action , 1982 .

[30]  Abbas Tashakkori,et al.  Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 1998 .

[31]  Rosaline S. Barbour,et al.  The Case for Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches in Health Services Research , 1999, Journal of health services research & policy.

[32]  D L Morgan,et al.  Practical Strategies for Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Applications to Health Research , 1998, Qualitative health research.