Factors affecting perceptual thresholds in epiretinal prostheses.

PURPOSE The goal was to evaluate how perceptual thresholds are related to electrode impedance, electrode size, the distance of electrodes from the retinal surface, and retinal thickness in six subjects blind as a result of retinitis pigmentosa, who received epiretinal prostheses implanted monocularly as part of a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved clinical trial. METHODS The implant consisted of an extraocular unit containing electronics for wireless data, power recovery, and generation of stimulus current, and an intraocular unit containing 16 platinum stimulating electrodes (260- or 520-microm diameter) arranged in a 4 x 4 pattern. The electrode array was held onto the retina by a small tack. Stimulation was controlled by a computer-based external system that allowed independent control over each electrode. Perceptual thresholds (the current necessary to see a percept on 79% of trials) and impedance were measured for each electrode on a biweekly basis. The distance of electrodes from the retinal surface and retinal thickness were measured by optical coherence tomography on a less regular basis. RESULTS Stimulation thresholds for detecting phosphenes correlated with the distance of the electrodes from the retinal surface, but not with electrode size, electrode impedance, or retinal thickness. CONCLUSIONS Maintaining close proximity between the electrode array and the retinal surface is critical in developing a successful retinal implant. With the development of chronic electrode arrays that are stable and flush on the retinal surface, it is likely that the influence of other factors such as electrode size, retinal degeneration, and subject age will become more apparent. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00279500.).

[1]  S Hecht,et al.  ENERGY AT THE THRESHOLD OF VISION. , 1941, Science.

[2]  E. Zrenner Will Retinal Implants Restore Vision ? , 2002 .

[3]  F. Hambrecht,et al.  CRITERIA FOR SELECTING ELECTRODES FOR ELECTRICAL STIMULATION: THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS , 1983, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[4]  K Heimann,et al.  Successful long-term implantation of electrically inactive epiretinal microelectrode arrays in rabbits. , 1999, Retina.

[5]  Samip P. Shah,et al.  Electrical properties of retinal–electrode interface , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.

[6]  Gislin Dagnelie,et al.  Facial recognition using simulated prosthetic pixelized vision. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[7]  Gislin Dagnelie,et al.  Visually guided performance of simple tasks using simulated prosthetic vision. , 2003, Artificial organs.

[8]  S. B. Brummer,et al.  Electrical Stimulation with Pt Electrodes: II-Estimation of Maximum Surface Redox (Theoretical Non-Gassing) Limits , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  A. Watson,et al.  Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  J. G. Webster,et al.  Analysis and Control of the Current Distribution under Circular Dispersive Electrodes , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  Yael Henkin,et al.  Changes over time in electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance values in children using the Nucleus 24M cochlear implant. , 2003, International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology.

[12]  M F Dorman,et al.  Long-term measures of electrode impedance and auditory thresholds for the Ineraid cochlear implant. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[13]  Maciej Wojtkowski,et al.  Retinal assessment using optical coherence tomography , 2006, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[14]  J. Weiland,et al.  Implantation of an inactive epiretinal poly(dimethyl siloxane) electrode array in dogs. , 2004, Experimental eye research.

[15]  J. Duker,et al.  Three-dimensional retinal imaging with high-speed ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography. , 2005, Ophthalmology.

[16]  B. Jones,et al.  Retinal remodeling triggered by photoreceptor degenerations , 2003, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[17]  S. Kelly,et al.  Methods and perceptual thresholds for short-term electrical stimulation of human retina with microelectrode arrays. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[18]  Paul J. Abbas,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of Electrode Impedance, the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential, and Behavioral Measures in Nucleus 24 Cochlear Implant Users , 2001, Ear and hearing.

[19]  Daniel Palanker,et al.  Design of a high-resolution optoelectronic retinal prosthesis , 2005, Journal of neural engineering.

[20]  B. Wilson,et al.  Cochlear Implants: Principles & Practices , 2000 .

[21]  G. Fishman,et al.  Retinal nerve fiber layer defects in RP patients. , 2007, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[22]  J. Rubinstein,et al.  In vitro measurement and characterization of current density profiles produced by nonrecessed, simple recessed, and radially varying recessed stimulating electrodes , 1991, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  J. Duker,et al.  In vivo measurement of retinal physiology with high-speed ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography. , 2006, Optics letters.

[24]  B. Jones,et al.  Retinal remodeling in inherited photoreceptor degenerations , 2003, Molecular Neurobiology.

[25]  E. Chichilnisky,et al.  Electrical stimulation of mammalian retinal ganglion cells with multielectrode arrays. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  R. H. Propst,et al.  Visual perception elicited by electrical stimulation of retina in blind humans. , 1996, Archives of ophthalmology.

[27]  S. Kelly,et al.  Perceptual efficacy of electrical stimulation of human retina with a microelectrode array during short-term surgical trials. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[28]  J D Loudin,et al.  Optoelectronic retinal prosthesis: system design and performance , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.

[29]  G M Clark,et al.  A study of intra-cochlear electrodes and tissue interface by electrochemical impedance methods in vivo. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[30]  R. Sharma,et al.  Management of hereditary retinal degenerations: present status and future directions. , 1999, Survey of ophthalmology.

[31]  D. Norren,et al.  Origin of the electroretinogram in the intact macaque eye—II Current source-density analysis , 1985, Vision Research.

[32]  J. Ohta,et al.  The development of a multichannel electrode array for retinal prostheses , 2006, Journal of Artificial Organs.

[33]  J. Weiland,et al.  Visual performance using a retinal prosthesis in three subjects with retinitis pigmentosa. , 2007, American journal of ophthalmology.

[34]  A. Milam,et al.  Morphometric analysis of the extramacular retina from postmortem eyes with retinitis pigmentosa. , 1999, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[35]  Michael Tykocinski,et al.  Threshold, Comfortable Level and Impedance Changes as a Function of Electrode-Modiolar Distance , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[36]  Joseph F Rizzo,et al.  Thresholds for activation of rabbit retinal ganglion cells with an ultrafine, extracellular microelectrode. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[37]  Gislin Dagnelie,et al.  Visual perception in a blind subject with a chronic microelectronic retinal prosthesis , 2003, Vision Research.

[38]  R. Jensen,et al.  Thresholds for activation of rabbit retinal ganglion cells with relatively large, extracellular microelectrodes. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[39]  Alexander Sher,et al.  Ganglion Cells With Multielectrode Arrays Electrical Stimulation of Mammalian Retinal , 2006 .

[40]  A. Milam,et al.  Preservation of the inner retina in retinitis pigmentosa. A morphometric analysis. , 1997, Archives of ophthalmology.

[41]  B. Jones,et al.  Neural remodeling in retinal degeneration , 2003, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[42]  Eyal Margalit,et al.  Retinal and optic nerve diseases. , 2003, Artificial organs.

[43]  J. Weiland,et al.  Perceptual thresholds and electrode impedance in three retinal prosthesis subjects , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[44]  Jay T. Rubinstein,et al.  Current Density Profiles of Surface Mounted and Recessed Electrodes for Neural Prostheses , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[45]  D. Norren,et al.  Origin of the electroretinogram in the intact macaque eye—I Principal component analysis , 1985, Vision Research.

[46]  J. G. Webster,et al.  Distributed Equivalent-Circuit Models for Circular Dispersive Electrodes , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[47]  Ronald E. Carr,et al.  9. Retinitis Pigmentosa , 1981 .

[48]  J. Kronenberg,et al.  Changes over time in the psycho-electric parameters in children with cochlear implants: Cambios en el tiempo, de los parámetros psico-eléctricos en niños con implante coclear , 2003, International journal of audiology.

[49]  X. Beebe,et al.  Charge injection limits of activated iridium oxide electrodes with 0.2 ms pulses in bicarbonate buffered saline (neurological stimulation application) , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[50]  J. Weiland,et al.  Pattern electrical stimulation of the human retina , 1999, Vision Research.

[51]  Thomas Schanze,et al.  Implantation of retina stimulation electrodes and recording of electrical stimulation responses in the visual cortex of the cat , 2000, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[52]  J. Robson,et al.  Discrimination at threshold: Labelled detectors in human vision , 1981, Vision Research.

[53]  Mark S Humayun,et al.  The value of preoperative tests in the selection of blind patients for a permanent microelectronic implant. , 2003, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[54]  J. Rizzo,et al.  Outer retinal degeneration: an electronic retinal prosthesis as a treatment strategy. , 2004, Archives of ophthalmology.