To Comply or Not To Comply? Pollution Standard Setting Under Costly Monitoring and Sanctioning

In this paper, we characterize optimal regulatory policies composed of a pollution standard, a probability of inspection and a fine for non-compliance, in a context where both monitoring and sanctioning are socially costly, and the penalty may include gravity and non-gravity components at the regulator’s discretion. Under given penalties, the optimal policy entails compliance with the standard as long as a quite intuitive condition is met. Non-compliant policies may include standards even below the pollution levels that minimize the sum of abatement costs and external damages. Interestingly, the appropriate structure of the penalty under non-compliance is highly progressive, while the best possible shape of the fine under compliance is linear. If the regulator is entitled to choose the structure of the fine, linear penalties are socially preferred and the optimal policy induces compliance.

[1]  J. Kambhu Regulatory standards, noncompliance and enforcement , 1989 .

[2]  A. Malik,et al.  Bargaining in Environmental Regulation and the Ideal Regulator , 1996 .

[3]  H W Gottinger Incentive compatible environmental regulation. , 2001, Journal of environmental management.

[4]  Carmen Arguedas Bargaining in environmental regulation revisited , 2005 .

[5]  Winston Harrington,et al.  Enforcement leverage when penalties are restricted , 1988 .

[6]  T. Tietenberg,et al.  The structure of penalties in environmental enforcement: An economic analysis , 1992 .

[7]  Carmen Arguedas,et al.  Controlling Pollution with Relaxed Regulations , 2004 .

[8]  John Livernois,et al.  Truth or consequences: Enforcing pollution standards with self-reporting , 1999 .

[9]  A. Keeler,et al.  Penalty Functions for Environmental Violations: Evidence from Water Quality Enforcement , 1998 .

[10]  Gregory M. Ellis INCENTIVE COMPATIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS , 1992 .

[11]  Steven Shavell,et al.  A Note on Optimal Fines When Wealth Varies Among Individuals , 1990 .

[12]  W. Harrington Regulating Industrial Water Pollution in the United States , 2003 .

[13]  J. Harford,et al.  Firm behavior under imperfectly enforceable pollution standards and taxes , 1978 .

[14]  Anthony Heyes,et al.  Implementing Environmental Regulation: Enforcement and Compliance , 2000 .

[15]  Juan-Pablo Montero,et al.  Prices versus quantities with incomplete enforcement , 2002 .

[16]  P. Bose Regulatory errors, optimal fines and the level of compliance , 1995 .

[17]  J. Stranlund,et al.  The regulatory choice of noncompliance in emissions trading programs , 2006 .

[18]  Sandra Rousseau,et al.  Comparing Environmental Policy Instruments in the Presence of Imperfect Compliance – A Case Study , 2005 .

[19]  J. Stranlund,et al.  Effective Enforcement of a Transferable Emissions Permit System with a Self-Reporting Requirement , 2000 .

[20]  M. Cohen Monitoring and Enforcement of Environmental Policy , 1998 .

[21]  Steven Shavell,et al.  The Optimal Tradeoff between the Probability and Magnitude of Fines , 1981 .

[22]  A. Malik,et al.  Markets for Pollution Control when Firms Are Noncompliant , 1990 .

[23]  W. Watson,et al.  The economics of enforcing air pollution controls , 1974 .

[24]  A. Heyes Cutting environmental penalties to protect the environment , 1996 .

[25]  John Livernois,et al.  Truth or Consequences? Enforcing Pollution Standards , 1996 .

[26]  Steven Shavell,et al.  The Economic Theory of Public Enforcement of Law , 1998 .

[27]  John K. Stranlund,et al.  Endogenous monitoring and enforcement of a transferable emissions permit system , 1999 .

[28]  A. Malik Avoidance, screening and optimum enforcement , 1990 .