Assessment of defects at tooth/self-adhering flowable composite interface using swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT).

OBJECTIVES Assessment of adhesive defects of a self-etch adhesive and a self-adhering flowable composite at the tooth/composite interface before and after water storage by optical coherence tomography (OCT). METHODS 16 extracted human molars (n=8 each) with box-shaped, class-V cavities were restored either with an experimental self-adhering flowable composite (EF, DMG) or with the filling system Adper™ Prompt™ L-Pop™/Filtek™ Supreme XT Flowable composite (PLP, 3M ESPE). Restorations of both groups were non-invasively imaged using swept-source OCT before and after storage in water. The OCT signal for adhesive defects at the tooth/composite interface was quantified. RESULTS At enamel, significantly fewer adhesive defects were detected at EF restorations than at PLP restorations, before water storage (4%/48%, p<0.001) and thereafter (8%/49%, p<0.001); in contrast, at dentin more interfacial defects were observed with EF (before water storage: 75%/11%; p<0.001, after water storage: 77%/52%; pi=0.001). In the case of slight initial adhesive defects, water storage caused a statistically verifiable increase in adhesive defects at the enamel interface with EF (before/after storage: 4%/8%; p=0.023) and at dentin with PLP (before/after storage: 11%/52%; p=0.008). SIGNIFICANCE Given the high proportion of adhesive defects with the experimental self-adhering flowable composite, its use as the definitive restorative material in class-V cavities must be critically scrutinized and clinical indications must be investigated further with in vitro and in vivo trials.

[1]  A. Mine,et al.  Bonding effectiveness of self-adhesive composites to dentin and enamel. , 2013, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[2]  N. Tuloglu,et al.  Shear Bond Strength of Self-Adhering Flowable Composite on Dentin with and without Application of an Adhesive System , 2014, Journal of applied biomaterials & functional materials.

[3]  Tiegen Liu,et al.  Measurement of the refractive index of human teeth by optical coherence tomography. , 2009, Journal of biomedical optics.

[4]  Sheng Lin-Gibson,et al.  Evaluation of dental composite shrinkage and leakage in extracted teeth using X-ray microcomputed tomography. , 2009, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[5]  G. Eckert,et al.  Three different methods to evaluate microleakage of packable composites in Class II restorations. , 2003, Operative dentistry.

[6]  Alireza Sadr,et al.  Non-invasive quantification of resin-dentin interfacial gaps using optical coherence tomography: validation against confocal microscopy. , 2011, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[7]  A. Gomes,et al.  Evaluation of the integrity of dental sealants by optical coherence tomography. , 2011, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[8]  S. Robinson,et al.  Correlative Transmission Electron Microscopy Examination of Nondemineralized and Demineralized Resin-Dentin Interfaces Formed by Two Dentin Adhesive Systems , 1996, Journal of dental research.

[9]  A. Tuncdemir,et al.  Inadequate shear bond strengths of self-etch, self-adhesive systems for secure orthodontic bonding. , 2012, Dental materials journal.

[10]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  A Critical Review of the Durability of Adhesion to Tooth Tissue: Methods and Results , 2005, Journal of dental research.

[11]  S. Wendt,et al.  The effect of thermocycling in microleakage analysis. , 1992, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[12]  M. Kuster,et al.  Influence of Dentinal Fluid and Stress on Marginal Adaptation of Resin Composites , 1993, Journal of dental research.

[13]  M. Toledano,et al.  Effect of sodium hypochlorite on dentin bonding with a polyalkenoic acid-containing adhesive system. , 2002, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[14]  D. Watts,et al.  Hygroscopic dimensional changes of self-adhering and new resin-matrix composites during water sorption/desorption cycles. , 2011, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[15]  Hartmut Schneider,et al.  Assessment of interfacial defects at composite restorations by swept source optical coherence tomography , 2013, Journal of biomedical optics.

[16]  F. Tay,et al.  Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching adhesives. Part II: etching effects on unground enamel. , 2001, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[17]  Junji Tagami,et al.  Swept-source optical coherence tomography as a new tool to evaluate defects of resin-based composite restorations. , 2011, Journal of dentistry.

[18]  M. Hellmich,et al.  Detection of marginal defects of composite restorations with conventional and digital radiographs. , 2002, European journal of oral sciences.

[19]  Steven M. Morgano,et al.  The effect of thermocycling on microleakage of several commercially available composite Class V restorations in vitro. , 2003, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[20]  A. Vichi,et al.  Bonding and sealing ability of a new self-adhering flowable composite resin in class I restorations , 2012, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[21]  E. Swift,et al.  Effects of repeated use on bond strengths of one-bottle adhesives. , 1999, Quintessence international.

[22]  D. Pashley,et al.  Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems. I: Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. , 2001, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[23]  Zoran R. Vulicevic,et al.  Self-adhesive resin cements: a literature review. , 2008, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[24]  H. Akin,et al.  Evaluation of a self-adhering flowable composite in terms of micro-shear bond strength and microleakage , 2013, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[25]  Masayoshi Fukushima,et al.  Evaluation of physical properties and surface degradation of self-adhesive resin cements. , 2007, Dental materials journal.

[26]  R. Hickel,et al.  Clinical results and new developments of direct posterior restorations. , 2000, American journal of dentistry.

[27]  M V Cardoso,et al.  Current aspects on bonding effectiveness and stability in adhesive dentistry. , 2011, Australian dental journal.

[28]  P. Spencer,et al.  Continuing Etching of an All-in-One Adhesive in Wet Dentin Tubules , 2005, Journal of dental research.

[29]  R. Haak,et al.  Experimental and clinical evaluation of a self-etching and an etch-and-rinse adhesive system. , 2013, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[30]  J F Roulet,et al.  Quantitative margin analysis in the scanning electron microscope. , 1989, Scanning microscopy.

[31]  W. D’hoore,et al.  Reliability of in vitro microleakage tests: a literature review. , 2001, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[32]  C. Davidson,et al.  Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives. , 1997, Journal of dentistry.

[33]  B. Darvell,et al.  Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. , 1999, Journal of dentistry.

[34]  E. Kidd,et al.  Microleakage: a review. , 1976, Journal of dentistry.