Mobilising differential visions for new product innovation

In contexts of complexity and high uncertainty, turning the differing visions of stakeholders into a shared attainable vision is crucial to the creation, validation and acceptance of a realized innovation. This paper seeks to explore the contingency role that product innovation teams play in mobilising the divergent visions of various organisational stakeholders into an idealised future. After studying four new product innovation projects in three software organisations, we identified innovation of meaning, multilateral participation, and the consilience and organisation of context as the three quintessentially embedded processes that underpin the mobilisation of stakeholders’ expressions of the future into an idealised future vision. The case evidence also demonstrates that vision incongruence on the part of different stakeholders concerning the future innovation may impede the generation of a shared interpretation of the future, and hence the subsequent capture of value.

[1]  E. Garnsey,et al.  Commercializing Generic Technology: The Case of Advanced Materials Ventures , 2005 .

[2]  Wim G. Biemans,et al.  User and third-party involvement in developing medical equipment innovations☆ , 1991 .

[3]  Henry L. Tosi A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance , 1991 .

[4]  Paolo Tessarolo,et al.  Is Integration Enough for Fast Product Development? An Empirical Investigation of the Contextual Effects of Product Vision* , 2007 .

[5]  E. Davidson A Technological Frames Perspective on Information Technology and Organizational Change , 2006 .

[6]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Qualitative Analysis For Social Scientists , 1987 .

[7]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations , 1994, TOIS.

[8]  Gina Colarelli O'Connor,et al.  The nature of market visioning for technology‐based radical innovation , 2001 .

[9]  Ruud van der Helm The vision phenomenon: Towards a theoretical underpinning of visions of the future and the process of envisioning , 2009 .

[10]  C. K. Prahalad,et al.  THE DOMINANT LOGIC: RETROSPECTIVE AND EXTENSION , 1995 .

[11]  Mark B. Houston,et al.  Barriers to Matching New Technologies and Market Opportunities in Established Firms , 2003 .

[12]  Alistair Sutcliffe,et al.  User-Centred Requirements Engineering , 2002 .

[13]  Robert K. Yin,et al.  Applications of case study research , 1993 .

[14]  Ted Fuller,et al.  Constructing futures: A social constructionist perspective on foresight methodology , 2009 .

[15]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[16]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 1995 .

[17]  Gernot Grabher Temporary Architectures of Learning: Knowledge Governance in Project Ecologies , 2004 .

[18]  M. Fransman Visions of innovation : the firm and Japan , 1999 .

[19]  Steven Postrel,et al.  Shared knowledge, “glitches,” and product development performance , 1999 .

[20]  Adelaide Maria de Souza Antunes,et al.  Technological foresight—the use of biotechnology in the development of new drugs against breast cancer , 2004 .

[21]  C. Merle Crawford,et al.  New Products Management , 1983 .

[22]  Oliver Ibert Projects and firms as discordant complements: organisational learning in the Munich software ecology , 2004 .

[23]  Ali E. Akgün,et al.  Project Visioning: Its Components and Impact on New Product Success , 2001 .

[24]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[25]  G. Lilien,et al.  Determinants of new industrial product performance: a strategic re-examination of the empirical literature , 1989 .

[26]  B. V. Wæhrens,et al.  Failures to Enact the Future - a Social Practice Perspective , 2010 .

[27]  D. Silverman Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction , 1994 .

[28]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Organizational Boundaries and Inter-organizational Conflict , 1971 .

[29]  Frank Maurer,et al.  The role of blogging in generating a software product vision , 2009, 2009 ICSE Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects on Software Engineering.

[30]  Robert Chia,et al.  Using Teams to Avoid Peripheral Blindness , 2007 .

[31]  Jeffrey B. Schmidt,et al.  Antecedents and consequences of cross-functional cooperation: A comparison of R&D, manufacturing, and marketing perspectives , 1997 .

[32]  J. March The Future, Disposable Organizations and the Rigidities of Imagination , 1995 .

[33]  Neil C. Ramiller,et al.  The Organizing Vision in Information Systems Innovation , 1997 .

[34]  Gernot Grabher,et al.  The Project Ecology of Advertising: Tasks, Talents and Teams , 2002 .

[35]  Susan E. Reid,et al.  Market Vision and Market Visioning Competence: Impact on Early Performance for Radically-New, High-Tech Products , 2010 .

[36]  Gerhard Masur,et al.  The image of the future : enlightening the past, orientating the present, forecasting the future , 1962 .

[37]  Susan E. Reid,et al.  Technology Vision: A Scale Development , 2011 .

[38]  R. Suddaby From the Editors: What Grounded Theory is Not , 2006 .

[39]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[40]  L. Spencer,et al.  Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research , 2002 .

[41]  E. Revilla,et al.  Team Vision in Product Development: how knowledge strategy matters? , 2011 .

[42]  C. Andriopoulos,et al.  Probing the future: Mobilising foresight in multiple-product innovation firms , 2006 .

[43]  M. Tushman Special Boundary Roles in the Innovation Process. , 1977 .

[44]  Richard A. D'Aveni Waking up to the new era of hypercompetition , 1998 .

[45]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1992 .

[46]  I. von Wartburg,et al.  Visioning for innovation - how firms inject knowledge about the future into innovative activities , 2003, IEMC '03 Proceedings. Managing Technologically Driven Organizations: The Human Side of Innovation and Change.

[47]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry , 1995 .

[48]  John Howells,et al.  Rethinking the Market-Technology Relationship for Innovation , 1997 .

[49]  D. Dougherty A PRACTICE-CENTERED MODEL OF ORGANIZATIONAL RENEWAL THROUGH PRODUCT INNOVATION , 1992 .