Histological observation of excellent bony remodeling in xenogenic bone graft for dental implant

With the multiple practices of bone graft using different artificial bone regenerative substitutes, the bone graft procedures have been widely performed to increase the bony stabilization of dental implant. Xenogenic bone graft materials have been well developed because of their good biocompatibility and abundant source of bone materials. The present study demonstrated the histological findings from excellent bony remodeling in xenogenic bone graft biopsies compared to those findings in autogenous bone graft. For the graft bone biopsies which were usually done in 5-9 months after graft bone insertion, five types of histological grades including excellent, favorable, partial, degenerative, and poor bony remodeling could be assessed to give prognostic information for dental implant. However, recently the xenograft bone materials have been much improved and produced strong osteogenic effect. Among 239 cases of trephine bur-supported core bone biopsy the excellent bony remodeling was found in 20 cases (13.1%) out of 153 xenogenic bone grafts and in 13 cases (43.3%) out of 30 autogenous bone grafts. They produced abundant new bones on the surface of the graft bones in 5–9 months, and the graft bones were partly resorbed and also surrounded by the repetitive deposition of new bone. The osteophytic new bones showed strong birefringence under polarizing microscope, and were gradually elongated and anastomosed with each other to form trabecular bony networks which became proper stress-baring structures for dental implant. Their marrow stromal tissues were composed of loose connective tissue which was well vascularized but rarely infiltrated with inflammatory cells. The present study compared the histological features of excellent bony remodeling between xenogenic and autogenous bone grafts. Although the ratio of excellent bony remodeling in xenogenic bone graft was still low, 13.1%, the recent advance of xenogeic bone products was remarkable in biological aspect and almost comparable to the autogenous bones. Therefore, it was suggested that the xenogenic bone graft will be applicable to the bone regeneration procedures for dental implant with beneficial output in the near future.

[1]  C. Dahlin,et al.  Demineralized Xenogenic Dentin and Autogenous Bone as Onlay Grafts to Rabbit Tibia , 2017, Implant dentistry.

[2]  R. Hegde,et al.  Maxillary sinus augmentation using sinus membrane elevation without grafts - A Systematic Review , 2016, Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society.

[3]  G. Benic,et al.  Guided bone regeneration of peri-implant defects with particulated and block xenogenic bone substitutes. , 2016, Clinical oral implants research.

[4]  L. Stefanelli,et al.  Clinical, Radiographic, and Histologic Evaluation of Maxillary Sinus Lift Procedure Using a Highly Purified Xenogenic Graft (Laddec®) , 2016, Journal of oral & maxillofacial research.

[5]  J. Díaz-Rodríguez,et al.  Survival of Dental Implants Placed in Grafted and Nongrafted Bone: A Retrospective Study in a University Setting. , 2016, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[6]  B. Friberg Bone augmentation for single tooth implants: A review of the literature. , 2016, European journal of oral implantology.

[7]  M. Berardini,et al.  A retrospective study of clinical and radiologic outcomes of 69 consecutive maxillary sinus augmentations associated with functional endoscopic sinus surgery. , 2015, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[8]  M. Licata,et al.  The use of human allogenic graft (HBA) for maxillary bone regeneration: review of literature and case reports. , 2012, Current pharmaceutical design.

[9]  A. Piattelli,et al.  Histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of an implant retrieved 8 years after insertion in a sinus augmented with anorganic bovine bone and anorganic bovine matrix associated with a cell-binding peptide: a case report. , 2012, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[10]  E. Behrens,et al.  Regenerative treatment of peri-implantitis bone defects with a combination of autologous bone and a demineralized xenogenic bone graft: a series of 36 defects. , 2012, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[11]  M. Dard,et al.  Immunohistochemical characterization of wound healing at two different bone graft substitutes. , 2012, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[12]  O. Fariñas,et al.  Five-Year Results of Implants Inserted Into Freeze-Dried Block Allografts , 2012, Implant dentistry.

[13]  Rui L Reis,et al.  Vascularization in bone tissue engineering: physiology, current strategies, major hurdles and future challenges. , 2010, Macromolecular bioscience.

[14]  B. McAllister,et al.  Histologic evaluation of recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-BB after use in extraction socket defects: a case series. , 2010, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[15]  Charles A Powell,et al.  Foreign Body Reaction to Anorganic Bovine Bone and Autogenous Bone With Platelet‐Rich Plasma in Guided Bone Regeneration , 2008 .

[16]  A. Piattelli,et al.  Histologic results from a human implant retrieved due to fracture 5 years after insertion in a sinus augmented with anorganic bovine bone. , 2008, Journal of periodontology.

[17]  L. Whitesides,et al.  Sinus floor augmentation using a composite graft of bone morphogenic protein-2 and allogenic cancellous bone (Puros): case report. , 2006, The Journal of oral implantology.

[18]  A. Piattelli,et al.  Osseointegration in a sinus augmented with bovine porous bone mineral: histological results in an implant retrieved 4 years after insertion. A case report. , 2004, Journal of periodontology.

[19]  Michael Toffler,et al.  Osteotome-mediated sinus floor elevation: a clinical report. , 2004, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[20]  E. Chi,et al.  A composite graft material containing bone particles and collagen in osteoinduction in mouse. , 2002, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[21]  G. Tawil,et al.  Sinus floor elevation using a bovine bone mineral (Bio-Oss) with or without the concomitant use of a bilayered collagen barrier (Bio-Gide): a clinical report of immediate and delayed implant placement. , 2001, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.