Analysis and reduction of errors caused by Poisson noise for phase diversity technique.

An effective method for reducing the sensitivity of phase diversity (PD) technique to Poisson noise is proposed. The denoising algorithm based on blocking-matching and 3D filtering is first introduced in the wavefront sensing field as a preprocessing stage. Then, the PD technique is applied to the denoised images. Results of the numerical simulations and experiments demonstrate that our approach is better than the traditional PD technique in terms of both the root-mean-square error (RMSE) of phase estimates and the structural similarity index metrics (SSIM). The RMSEs of phase estimates on synthetic data are decreased by approximately 40% across noise levels within the range of 58.7-18.8 dB in terms of peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR). Meanwhile, the overall decline range of SSIM is significantly decreased from 49% to 9%. The experiment and simulation results are in good agreement. The approach may be widely used in various domains, such as the measurements of intrinsic aberrations in optical systems and compensations for atmospheric turbulence.

[1]  James R. Fienup,et al.  Joint estimation of object and aberrations by using phase diversity , 1992 .

[2]  Karen O. Egiazarian,et al.  Image denoising with block-matching and 3D filtering , 2006, Electronic Imaging.

[3]  D. S. Acton,et al.  Phase-diversity wave-front sensor for imaging systems. , 1994, Applied optics.

[4]  Robert A. Gonsalves,et al.  Wavefront Sensing By Phase Retrieval , 1979, Optics & Photonics.

[5]  Alessandro Foi,et al.  Optimal Inversion of the Anscombe Transformation in Low-Count Poisson Image Denoising , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[6]  Richard G. Paxman,et al.  Phase-diverse speckle reconstruction of solar data , 1994, Optics & Photonics.

[7]  Alessandro Foi,et al.  Image Denoising by Sparse 3-D Transform-Domain Collaborative Filtering , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[8]  R. Noll.  Zernike polynomials and atmospheric turbulence , 1976 .

[9]  Mats G. Lofdahl,et al.  Wavefront sensing and image restoration from focused and defocused solar images. , 1994 .

[10]  David J. Lee,et al.  Comparison of Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensing and phase-diverse phase retrieval , 1997, Optics & Photonics.

[11]  Mats G. Lofdahl,et al.  Application of phase-diversity to solar images , 1994, Optics & Photonics.

[12]  Robert A. Gonsalves,et al.  Phase Retrieval And Diversity In Adaptive Optics , 1982 .

[13]  Michael C. Roggemann,et al.  Cramér–Rao analysis of phase-diverse wave-front sensing , 1999 .

[14]  Keith E. Mitchell,et al.  Phase diversity experiment to measure piston misalignment on the segmented primary mirror of the Keck II Telescope , 1998, Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation.

[15]  Jean J. Dolne.  Evaluation of the phase diversity algorithm for noise statistics error and diversity function combination , 2006, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[16]  J. H. Deville,et al.  Practical issues in wave-front sensing by use of phase diversity. , 2003, Applied optics.

[17]  L M Mugnier,et al.  Noise propagation in wave-front sensing with phase diversity. , 1999, Applied optics.

[18]  Virendra N. Mahajan,et al.  Strehl ratio for primary aberrations: some analytical results for circular and annular pupils. , 1982 .