Robot Gaze Can Mediate Participation Imbalance in Groups with Different Skill Levels

Many small group activities, like working teams or study groups, have a high dependency on the skill of each group member. Differences in skill level among participants can affect not only the performance of a team but also influence the social interaction of its members. In these circumstances, an active member could balance individual participation without exerting direct pressure on specific members by using indirect means of communication, such as gaze behaviors. Similarly, in this study, we evaluate whether a social robot can balance the level of participation in a language skill-dependent game, played by a native speaker and a second language learner. In a between-subjects study (N = 72), we compared an adaptive robot gaze behavior, that was targeted to increase the level of contribution of the least active player, with a non-adaptive gaze behavior. Our results imply that, while overall levels of speech participation were influenced predominantly by personal traits of the participants, the robot's adaptive gaze behavior could shape the interaction among participants which lead to more even participation during the game.

[1]  Gabriel Skantze,et al.  Predicting and Regulating Participation Equality in Human-Robot Conversations: Effects of Age and Gender , 2017, 2017 12th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI.

[2]  Guy Hoffman,et al.  Human-human-robot interaction: robotic object’s responsive gestures improve interpersonal evaluation in human interaction , 2020, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[3]  Jeffrey Dean,et al.  Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality , 2013, NIPS.

[4]  Goren Gordon,et al.  Robot-Supported Collaborative Learning (RSCL): Social Robots as Teaching Assistants for Higher Education Small Group Facilitation , 2020, Frontiers in Robotics and AI.

[5]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  Classification of Children's Social Dominance in Group Interactions with Robots , 2015, ICMI.

[6]  Bilge Mutlu,et al.  A Storytelling Robot: Modeling and Evaluation of Human-like Gaze Behavior , 2006, 2006 6th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots.

[7]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  Strategies for the Inclusion of Human Members within Human-Robot Teams , 2020, 2020 15th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[8]  Iolanda Leite,et al.  A social robot mediator to foster collaboration and inclusion among children , 2020, Robotics: Science and Systems.

[9]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Using Robots to Moderate Team Conflict: The Case of Repairing Violations , 2015, 2015 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[10]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  Vulnerable robots positively shape human conversational dynamics in a human–robot team , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Scott E. Hudson,et al.  Towards Robot Autonomy in Group Conversations: Understanding the Effects of Body Orientation and Gaze , 2017, 2017 12th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI.

[12]  F. Biocca,et al.  Internal Consistency and Reliability of the Networked Minds Social Presence Measure , 2006 .

[13]  Amy S. Thompson.  Motivation, language identity and the L2 self , 2010 .

[14]  Ana Paiva,et al.  Group-based Emotions in Teams of Humans and Robots , 2018, 2018 13th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[15]  Timothy W. Bickmore,et al.  A Multimodal Robot-Driven Meeting Facilitation System for Group Decision-Making Sessions , 2019, ICMI.

[16]  Jerold L. Hale,et al.  Relational Messages Associated with Nonverbal Behaviors. , 1984 .

[17]  Jennifer Evans,et al.  Inclusive education: are there limits? , 2002, DECP Debate.

[18]  Solace Shen,et al.  Micbot: A Peripheral Robotic Object to Shape Conversational Dynamics and Team Performance , 2019, 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[19]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Footing in human-robot conversations: How robots might shape participant roles using gaze cues , 2009, 2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[20]  Malte F. Jung,et al.  Multi-Armed Bandits with Fairness Constraints for Distributing Resources to Human Teammates , 2020, 2020 15th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[21]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  Comparing Models of Disengagement in Individual and Group Interactions , 2015, 2015 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[22]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Conversational gaze mechanisms for humanlike robots , 2012, TIIS.

[23]  Ana Paiva,et al.  As Time goes by: Long-term evaluation of social presence in robotic companions , 2009, RO-MAN 2009 - The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[24]  Larry K. Michaelsen,et al.  How Group Dynamics Research Can Inform the Theory and Practice of Postsecondary Small Group Learning , 2007 .

[25]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  How Can a Social Robot Facilitate Children's Collaboration? , 2012, ICSR.

[26]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  Improving human-human collaboration between children with a social robot , 2016, 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[27]  Guy Hoffman,et al.  Design and Evaluation of a Peripheral Robotic Conversation Companion , 2015, 2015 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[28]  Mitsutoshi Okazaki,et al.  Revised NEO Personality Inventory（NEO-PI-R）を用いたてんかん患者におけるパーソナリティ傾向に関する検討 , 2018 .

[29]  Filipa Correia,et al.  Friends or Foes? Socioemotional Support and Gaze Behaviors in Mixed Groups of Humans and Robots , 2018, 2018 13th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[30]  J. Fuller,et al.  Comparison of Head Movement Strategies among Mammals , 1992 .

[31]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  Social robots for education: A review , 2018, Science Robotics.

[32]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Work group diversity and group performance: an integrative model and research agenda. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.