Imputation Approaches for Estimating Diagnostic Accuracy for Multiple Tests from Partially Verified Designs

Interest often focuses on estimating sensitivity and specificity of a group of raters or a set of new diagnostic tests in situations in which gold standard evaluation is expensive or invasive. Various authors have proposed semilatent class modeling approaches for estimating diagnostic accuracy in this situation. This article presents imputation approaches for this problem. I show how imputation provides a simpler way of performing diagnostic accuracy and prevalence estimation than the use of semilatent modeling. Furthermore, the imputation approach is more robust to modeling assumptions and, in general, there is only a moderate efficiency loss relative to a correctly specified semilatent class model. I apply imputation to a study designed to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of digital radiography for gastric cancer. The feasibility and robustness of imputation is illustrated with analysis, asymptotic results, and simulations.

[1]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 1994 .

[2]  H C Hendrie,et al.  Estimating disease prevalence from two-phase surveys with non-response at the second phase. , 2000, Statistics in medicine.

[3]  S G Baker,et al.  Evaluating multiple diagnostic tests with partial verification. , 1995, Biometrics.

[4]  Roseanne McNamee,et al.  Optimal designs of two‐stage studies for estimation of sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[5]  Yingye Zheng,et al.  Assessing Accuracy of Mammography in the Presence of Verification Bias and Intrareader Correlation , 2005, Biometrics.

[6]  L. Holmberg,et al.  Beta-carotene intake and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer. , 1999, Epidemiology.

[7]  S D Walter,et al.  Estimation of test sensitivity and specificity when disease confirmation is limited to positive results. , 1999, Epidemiology.

[8]  J M Simpson,et al.  Efficient study designs to assess the accuracy of screening tests. , 1994, American journal of epidemiology.

[9]  Enrique F Schisterman,et al.  On linear combinations of biomarkers to improve diagnostic accuracy , 2005, Statistics in medicine.

[10]  X H Zhou,et al.  ROC Curve Estimation When Covariates Affect the Verification Process , 2000, Biometrics.

[11]  Xiao-Hua Zhou,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimators of sensitivity and specificity corrected for verification bias , 1993 .

[12]  William J Catalona,et al.  Effect of verification bias on screening for prostate cancer by measurement of prostate-specific antigen. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  Lize van der Merwe,et al.  Estimating the conditional false-positive rate for semi-latent data. , 2002 .

[14]  G. Iinuma,et al.  Diagnosis of gastric cancers: comparison of conventional radiography and digital radiography with a 4 million-pixel charge-coupled device. , 2000, Radiology.

[15]  Margaret S. Pepe,et al.  Assessing accuracy of a continuous screening test in the presence of verification bias , 2005 .

[16]  S. Zeger,et al.  Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models , 1986 .

[17]  Margaret Sullivan Pepe,et al.  Estimating disease prevalence in two-phase studies. , 2003, Biostatistics.

[18]  A two-stage validation study for determining sensitivity and specificity. , 1994, Environmental health perspectives.

[19]  M. Pepe The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction , 2003 .

[20]  Huiman X Barnhart,et al.  Accounting for Nonignorable Verification Bias in Assessment of Diagnostic Tests , 2003, Biometrics.

[21]  James M. Robins,et al.  Semiparametric Regression for Repeated Outcomes With Nonignorable Nonresponse , 1998 .

[22]  L. Dodd,et al.  On Estimating Diagnostic Accuracy From Studies With Multiple Raters and Partial Gold Standard Evaluation , 2008, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[23]  A. Segal,et al.  Diagnosis of gastric cancer. , 1975, British medical journal.

[24]  R A Greenes,et al.  Assessment of diagnostic tests when disease verification is subject to selection bias. , 1983, Biometrics.

[25]  P. Heagerty,et al.  Misspecified maximum likelihood estimates and generalised linear mixed models , 2001 .