Development of adjustment functions to assess combined safety effects of multiple treatments on rural two-lane roadways.

Numerous studies have attempted to evaluate the safety effectiveness of specific single treatment on roadways by estimating crash modification factors (CMFs). However, there is a need to also assess safety effects of multiple treatments since multiple treatments are usually simultaneously applied to roadways. Due to the lack of sufficient CMFs of multiple treatments, the Highway Safety Manual (HSM) provides combining method for multiple CMFs. However, it is cautioned in the HSM and related sources that combined safety effect of multiple CMFs may be over or under estimated. Moreover, the literature did not evaluate the accuracy of the combining method using CMFs obtained from the same study area. Thus, the main objectives of this research are: (1) to estimate CMFs and crash modification functions (CM Functions) for two single treatments (shoulder rumble strips, widening (1-9ft) shoulder width) and combination (installing shoulder rumble strips+widening shoulder width) using the observational before-after with empirical Bayes (EB) method and (2) to develop adjustment factors and functions to assess combined safety effects of multiple treatments based on the accuracy of the combined CMFs for multiple treatments estimated by the existing combining method. Data was collected for rural two-lane roadways in Florida and Florida-specific safety performance functions (SPFs) were estimated for different crash types and severities. The CM Functions and adjustment functions were developed using linear and nonlinear regression models. The results of before-after with EB method show that the two single treatments and combination are effective in reducing total and SVROR (single vehicle run-off roadway) crashes. The results indicate that the treatments were more safety effective for the roadway segments with narrower original shoulder width in the before period. It was found that although the CMFs for multiple treatments (i.e., combination of two single treatments) were generally lower than CMFs for single treatments, they were getting similar to the roadway segments with wider shoulder width. The findings indicate that the combined safety effects of multiple treatments using HSM combining method are mostly over-estimated and the accuracy of HSM combining method vary based on crash types and severity levels. Therefore, it is recommended to develop and apply the adjustment factors and functions to predict the safety effects of multiple treatments when the HSM combining method is used.

[1]  Paul J Carlson,et al.  Safety effects of wider edge lines on rural, two-lane highways. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Geographical unit based analysis in the context of transportation safety planning , 2013 .

[3]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Accounting for heterogeneity among treatment sites and time trends in developing crash modification functions. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  A Scott Tippetts,et al.  Language, Income, Education, and Alcohol-Related Fatal Motor Vehicle Crashes , 2006, Journal of ethnicity in substance abuse.

[5]  T. Research,et al.  Safety Evaluation of Rolled-In Continuous Shoulder Rumble Strips Installed on Freeways , 2022 .

[6]  Ezra Hauer,et al.  OBSERVATIONAL BEFORE-AFTER STUDIES IN ROAD SAFETY -- ESTIMATING THE EFFECT OF HIGHWAY AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING MEASURES ON ROAD SAFETY , 1997 .

[7]  Steven D Schrock,et al.  Safety Effectiveness of Various Types of Shoulders on Rural Two-Lane Roads in Winter and Non-winter Periods , 2013 .

[8]  Eric T. Donnell,et al.  Relating crash frequency and severity: evaluating the effectiveness of shoulder rumble strips on reducing fatal and major injury crashes. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  Juneyoung Park,et al.  Exploration and comparison of crash modification factors for multiple treatments on rural multilane roadways. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  Howard Preston,et al.  Benefit:Cost Analysis of In-Vehicle Technologies and Infrastructure Modifications as a Means to Prevent Crashes Along Curves and Shoulders , 2009 .

[11]  Rune Elvik,et al.  Developing Accident Modification Functions , 2009 .

[12]  Karin M Bauer,et al.  Safety Effects of Horizontal Curve and Grade Combinations on Rural Two-Lane Highways , 2013 .

[13]  Yingyan Lou,et al.  Calibration and Development of Safety Performance Functions for Alabama , 2013 .

[14]  Kaan Ozbay,et al.  A comparative Full Bayesian before-and-after analysis and application to urban road safety countermeasures in New Jersey. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  N N Sze,et al.  Contributory factors to traffic crashes at signalized intersections in Hong Kong. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Analyzing angle crashes at unsignalized intersections using machine learning techniques. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[17]  Rune Elvik,et al.  Introductory Guide to Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis , 2005 .

[18]  Rune Elvik.  Developing an accident modification function for speed enforcement , 2011 .

[19]  Kevin Hanley,et al.  Analysis of Accident-Reduction Factors on California State Highways , 2000 .

[20]  Bhagwant Persaud,et al.  Empirical Bayes before-after safety studies: lessons learned from two decades of experience and future directions. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  Frank Gross,et al.  Safety Effectiveness of Lane and Shoulder Width Combinations on Rural, Two-Lane, Undivided Roads , 2009 .

[22]  Juneyoung Park,et al.  Developing crash modification functions to assess safety effects of adding bike lanes for urban arterials with different roadway and socio-economic characteristics. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[23]  Rune Elvik,et al.  An exploratory analysis of models for estimating the combined effects of road safety measures. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[24]  Frank Gross,et al.  A Guide to Developing Quality Crash Modification Factors , 2010 .

[25]  Craig Lyon,et al.  Guidance for the Design and Application of Shoulder and Centerline Rumble Strips , 2009 .

[26]  Mary Pat McKay,et al.  National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) notes. Children injured in motor vehicle traffic crashes. Commentary. , 2010, Annals of emergency medicine.

[27]  Mike A. Males,et al.  Poverty as a determinant of young drivers' fatal crash risks. , 2009, Journal of safety research.

[28]  Helai Huang,et al.  County-Level Crash Risk Analysis in Florida: Bayesian Spatial Modeling , 2010 .

[29]  Ezra Hauer,et al.  Estimating Safety by the Empirical Bayes Method: A Tutorial , 2002 .

[30]  P. Jovanis,et al.  Estimation of Safety Effectiveness of Changes in Shoulder Width with Case Control and Cohort Methods , 2007 .

[31]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Impact of Rumble Strips on Collision Reduction on Highways in British Columbia, Canada: Comprehensive Before-and-After Safety Study , 2010 .

[32]  James A Bonneson,et al.  Development of Accident Modification Factors for Rural Frontage Road Segments in Texas , 2007 .

[33]  Karin M Bauer,et al.  Safety Effects of Horizontal Curve and Grade , 2013 .

[34]  Blair Turner,et al.  Effectiveness of road safety engineering treatments , 2012 .

[35]  Michael S. Griffith,et al.  Estimating Safety Benefits of Shoulder Rumble Strips on Two-Lane Rural Highways in Minnesota , 2007 .

[36]  Robert B Noland,et al.  Traffic fatalities and injuries: the effect of changes in infrastructure and other trends. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[37]  Samuel Labi,et al.  Efficacies of roadway safety improvements across functional subclasses of rural two-lane highways. , 2011, Journal of safety research.