Multidimensional Modeling of Biofilm Structure

A fully quantitative two- and three-dimensional approach for biofilm growth and structure formation has been developed. The present model incorporates the flow over the irregular biofilm surface, convective and diffusive mass transfer of substrate, bacterial growth, biomass spreading and biofilm detachment due to biofilm deformation stress. Any arbitrary shape of the carrier surface can be accommodated in the model, as well as multispecies and multisubstrate biofilms. Results of model simulations show that the ratio between nutrient transfer rate to the biofilm and the bacterial growth rate influences to a great extent the biofilm roughness and porosity. A low mass transfer rate, i.e., low Reynolds numbers or high values of Thiele modulus, results in the development of a rough and open biofilm. When the biofilm growth is limited not by substrate availability, but by the rate of bacterial metabolism, the biofilm forms as a compact and homogeneous structure. High shear forces lead, by means of continuous erosion and discrete sloughing events, to a smoother, more compact and thinner biofilm. The multidimensional biofilm modelling approach used is well suited for theoretical investigations of factors that affect biofilm structure and ecology.

[1]  Cristian Picioreanu,et al.  Constrained discounted Markov decision processes and Hamiltonian cycles , 1997, Proceedings of the 36th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[2]  S. Chen,et al.  Lattice methods and their applications to reacting systems , 1993, comp-gas/9312001.

[3]  C. Picioreanu,et al.  Influence of biomass production and detachment forces on biofilm structures in a biofilm airlift suspension reactor , 1998, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[4]  H. Nagaoka,et al.  Effect of turbulence on nitrifying biofilms at non-limiting substrate conditions , 1992 .

[5]  M. V. van Loosdrecht,et al.  Heterogeneity of biofilms in rotating annular reactors: Occurrence, structure, and consequences , 1994, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[6]  Slawomir W. Hermanowicz A model of two-dimensional biofilm morphology , 1998 .

[7]  Shiyi Chen,et al.  Lattice Boltzmann computations for reaction‐diffusion equations , 1993 .

[8]  Paul L. Bishop,et al.  Modelling heterogeneity in biofilms: Report of the discussion session , 1995 .

[9]  Paul Stoodley,et al.  Relation between the structure of an aerobic biofilm and transport phenomena , 1995 .

[10]  J J Heijnen,et al.  Mathematical modeling of biofilm structure with a hybrid differential-discrete cellular automaton approach. , 1998, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[11]  W Gujer,et al.  A multispecies biofilm model , 1986, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[12]  P. Stewart,et al.  Spatial Variations in Growth Rate within Klebsiellapneumoniae Colonies and Biofilm , 1996, Biotechnology progress.

[13]  J. Wimpenny,et al.  A unifying hypothesis for the structure of microbial biofilms based on cellular automaton models , 1997 .