Effect of Communication Medium on Virtual Design Teams' Workload

The movement toward distributed collaborative work groups or virtual teams by organizations has initiated a myriad of questions specific to human factors research. Distributed team members, linked through technological interfaces, may vary in location, discipline, company loyalties, and culture. While virtual teams are necessary in this environment of time compression, distributed resources, increasing dependence on knowledge-based input, and the integration of information and telecommunication technologies, there is an increasing need to understand factors influencing distributed work group performance. Communication research has demonstrated that as communication signals are narrowed by medium restraints, the communication process changes and group members adopt new communication strategies. This study hypothesized that a group's mental workload would increase as the communication bandwidth was constrained. Results show that audio and video groups did not perceive significantly different overall workloads; however, both exceeded that of face-to-face groups.

[1]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[2]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Developmental Processes in Group Decision Making , 1996 .

[3]  Clint A. Bowers,et al.  Effects of Workload and Structure on Team Processes and Performance: Implications for Complex Team Decision Making , 1996, Hum. Factors.

[4]  Jane M. Carey,et al.  The Impact of Communication Mode and Task Complexity on Small Group Performance and Member Satisfaction. , 1997 .

[5]  B. M. Kleiner,et al.  Identifying critical factors impacting virtual work group performance , 1996, IEMC 96 Proceedings. International Conference on Engineering and Technology Management. Managing Virtual Enterprises: A Convergence of Communications, Computing, and Energy Technologies.

[6]  Wendy Samter,et al.  DECISION‐MAKING PROCEDURE AND DECISION QUALITY , 1984 .

[7]  C. Wickens,et al.  Workload transition: Implications for individual and team performance. , 1993 .

[8]  Craig M. Harvey,et al.  Distributed collaboration for engineering design: A review and reappraisal. , 2001 .

[9]  Chris Forsythe,et al.  Human Factors in Agile Manufacturing , 1996 .

[10]  Clint A. Bowers,et al.  Effects of Workload and Structure on Team Processes and Performance: Implications for Complex Team Decision Making , 1996, Hum. Factors.

[11]  J. A. Jordan,et al.  Requirements for next generation manufacturing systems (NGMS) , 1994, Proceedings of 16th IEEE/CPMT International Electronic Manufacturing Technology Symposium.

[12]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  Concurrent engineering tools: are the human issues being ignored? , 1996 .

[13]  R. Gallupe,et al.  Unblocking brainstorms. , 1991, The Journal of applied psychology.

[14]  Virtual organizations-an opportunity for learning , 1996, IEMC 96 Proceedings. International Conference on Engineering and Technology Management. Managing Virtual Enterprises: A Convergence of Communications, Computing, and Energy Technologies.

[15]  S. R. Hiltz,et al.  Experiments in group decision making: Communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. , 1986 .

[16]  G. D. Weeks,et al.  Cooperative versus Conflictive Problem Solving in Three Telecommunication Modes , 1976 .

[17]  Ederyn Williams,et al.  Experimental comparisons of face-to-face and mediated communication: A review. , 1977 .