A novel algorithm for land use and land cover classification using RADARSAT-2 polarimetric SAR data

Abstract This study proposes a new four-component algorithm for land use and land cover (LULC) classification using RADARSAT-2 polarimetric SAR (PolSAR) data. These four components are polarimetric decomposition, PolSAR interferometry, object-oriented image analysis, and decision tree algorithms. First, polarimetric decomposition can be used to support the classification of PolSAR data. It is aimed at extracting polarimetric parameters related to the physical scattering mechanisms of the observed objects. Second, PolSAR interferometry is used to extract polarimetric interferometric information to support LULC classification. Third, the main purposes of object-oriented image analysis are delineating image objects, as well as extracting various textural and spatial features from image objects to improve classification accuracy. Finally, a decision tree algorithm provides an efficient way to select features and implement classification. A comparison between the proposed method and the Wishart supervised classification which is based on the coherency matrix was made to test the performance of the proposed method. The overall accuracy of the proposed method was 86.64%, whereas that of the Wishart supervised classification was 69.66%. The kappa value of the proposed method was 0.84, much higher than that of the Wishart supervised classification, which exhibited a kappa value of 0.65. The results indicate that the proposed method exhibits much better performance than the Wishart supervised classification for LULC classification. Further investigation was carried out on the respective contribution of the four components to LULC classification using RADARSAT-2 PolSAR data, and it indicates that all the four components have important contribution to the classification. Polarimetric information has significant implications for identifying different vegetation types and distinguishing between vegetation and urban/built-up. The polarimetric interferometric information extracted from repeat-pass RADARSAT-2 images is important in reducing the confusion between urban/built-up and vegetation and that between barren/sparsely vegetated land and vegetation. Object-oriented image analysis is very helpful in reducing the effect of speckle in PolSAR images by implementing classification based on image objects, and the textural information extracted from image objects is helpful in distinguishing between water and lawn. The decision tree algorithm can achieve higher classification accuracy than the nearest neighbor classification implemented using Definiens Developer 7.0, and the accuracy of the decision tree algorithm is similar with that of the support vector classification which is implemented based on the features selected using genetic algorithms. Compared with the nearest neighbor and support vector classification, the decision tree algorithm is more efficient to select features and implement classification. Furthermore, the decision tree algorithm can provide clear classification rules that can be easily interpreted based on the physical meaning of the features used in the classification. This can provide physical insight for LULC classification using PolSAR data.

[1]  A. Laliberte,et al.  Comparison of Nearest Neighbor and Rule-based Decision Tree Classification in an Object-oriented Environment , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[2]  Kamal Sarabandi,et al.  Knowledge-based classification of polarimetric SAR images , 1994, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[3]  Eric Pottier,et al.  Application of the «H / A / α» Polarimetric Decomposition Theorem for Unsupervised Classification of Fully Polarimetric SAR Data Based on the Wishart Distribution , 2000 .

[4]  C. Brodley,et al.  Decision tree classification of land cover from remotely sensed data , 1997 .

[5]  Melba M. Crawford,et al.  Fusion of airborne polarimetric and interferometric SAR for classification of coastal environments , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[6]  W. Holm,et al.  On radar polarization mixed target state decomposition techniques , 1988, Proceedings of the 1988 IEEE National Radar Conference.

[7]  Pat Langley,et al.  Selection of Relevant Features and Examples in Machine Learning , 1997, Artif. Intell..

[8]  Laurent Ferro-Famil,et al.  A general model-based polarimetric decomposition scheme for vegetated areas. , 2009 .

[9]  Prasad S. Thenkabail,et al.  Ganges and Indus river basin land use/land cover (LULC) and irrigated area mapping using continuous streams of MODIS data , 2005 .

[10]  Ben Gorte,et al.  A method for object-oriented land cover classification combining Landsat TM data and aerial photographs , 2003 .

[11]  Laurent Ferro-Famil,et al.  Unsupervised classification of multifrequency and fully polarimetric SAR images based on the H/A/Alpha-Wishart classifier , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[12]  Eric Pottier,et al.  An entropy based classification scheme for land applications of polarimetric SAR , 1997, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[13]  Rama Chellappa,et al.  Unsupervised segmentation of polarimetric SAR data using the covariance matrix , 1992, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[14]  Ron Kwok,et al.  Classification of multi-look polarimetric SAR imagery based on complex Wishart distribution , 1994 .

[15]  S. Cloude Target decomposition theorems in radar scattering , 1985 .

[16]  Philip H. Swain,et al.  Purdue e-Pubs , 2022 .

[17]  Thomas L. Ainsworth,et al.  Unsupervised classification using polarimetric decomposition and the complex Wishart classifier , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[18]  Ago Yeh,et al.  Urban growth management in the Pearl river delta: An integrated remote sensing and GIS approach , 1996 .

[19]  อนิรุธ สืบสิงห์,et al.  Data Mining Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques , 2014 .

[20]  Marc Acheroy,et al.  Fusion of PolSAR and PolInSAR data for land cover classification , 2009, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[21]  Ridha Touzi,et al.  Target Scattering Decomposition in Terms of Roll-Invariant Target Parameters , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[22]  Wei-Yin Loh,et al.  A Comparison of Prediction Accuracy, Complexity, and Training Time of Thirty-Three Old and New Classification Algorithms , 2000, Machine Learning.

[23]  Dar A. Roberts,et al.  Studies of land-cover, land-use, and biophysical properties of vegetation in the Large Scale Biosphere Atmosphere experiment in Amazonia , 2003 .

[24]  Anthony Freeman,et al.  Fitting a Two-Component Scattering Model to Polarimetric SAR Data From Forests , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[25]  F. Ulaby,et al.  Multitemporal land-cover classification using SIR-C/X-SAR imagery , 1998 .

[26]  Mark A. Friedl,et al.  Using prior probabilities in decision-tree classification of remotely sensed data , 2002 .

[27]  Vladimir N. Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory , 2000, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[28]  U. Benz,et al.  Multi-resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information , 2004 .

[29]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data : principles and practices , 1998 .

[30]  F. Ulaby,et al.  Textural Infornation in SAR Images , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[31]  X. Lia,et al.  Multitemporal SAR images for monitoring cultivation systems using case-based reasoning , 2004 .

[32]  Roger M. McCoy,et al.  Field Methods in Remote Sensing , 2004 .

[33]  Jakob J. Vanzyl,et al.  Application of Cloude's target decomposition theorem to polarimetric imaging radar data , 1993 .

[34]  João Roberto dos Santos,et al.  Land Use and Land Cover Mapping in the Brazilian Amazon Using Polarimetric Airborne P-Band SAR Data , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[35]  Konstantinos Papathanassiou,et al.  Single-baseline polarimetric SAR interferometry , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[36]  Paolo Gamba,et al.  Three-dimensional road network by fusion of polarimetric and interferometric SAR data , 1999, IEEE 1999 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. IGARSS'99 (Cat. No.99CH36293).

[37]  Eric Pottier,et al.  Quantitative comparison of classification capability: fully polarimetric versus dual and single-polarization SAR , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[38]  Stephen L. Durden,et al.  A three-component scattering model for polarimetric SAR data , 1998, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[39]  Kun-Shan Chen,et al.  Classification of multifrequency polarimetric SAR imagery using a dynamic learning neural network , 1996, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[40]  Jong-Sen Lee,et al.  Fuzzy classification of earth terrain covers using complex polarimetric SAR data , 1996 .

[41]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines , 2011, TIST.

[42]  W. Loh,et al.  SPLIT SELECTION METHODS FOR CLASSIFICATION TREES , 1997 .

[43]  Rama Chellappa,et al.  Classification of Multifrequency Multilook Synthetic Aperture Radar Data , 1991, [Proceedings] IGARSS'91 Remote Sensing: Global Monitoring for Earth Management.

[44]  Hiroyoshi Yamada,et al.  Four-component scattering model for polarimetric SAR image decomposition , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[45]  J. Huynen Phenomenological theory of radar targets , 1970 .

[46]  Houra Rais,et al.  Conservative Polarimetric Scatterers and Their Role in Incorrect Extensions of the Cameron Decomposition , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[47]  E. Krogager New decomposition of the radar target scattering matrix , 1990 .

[48]  Hiroyoshi Yamada,et al.  Stable Decomposition of Mueller Matrix , 1997 .

[49]  Jong-Sen Lee,et al.  Polarimetric SAR speckle filtering and its implication for classification , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[50]  Z. Qi,et al.  A Matching Algorithm for Detecting Land Use Changes Using Case-Based Reasoning , 2009 .

[51]  J. Watts,et al.  Monitoring of cropland practices for carbon sequestration purposes in north central Montana by Landsat remote sensing , 2009 .

[52]  Zhang Xiangmin,et al.  Comparison of pixel‐based and object‐oriented image classification approaches—a case study in a coal fire area, Wuda, Inner Mongolia, China , 2006 .

[53]  R. Congalton,et al.  Accuracy assessment: a user's perspective , 1986 .

[54]  Aleksandra Pizurica,et al.  Supervised feature-based classification of multi-channel SAR images , 2006, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[55]  J. V. Soares,et al.  Mapping deforestation and land use in Amazon rainforest by using SIR-C imagery , 1997 .

[56]  V. Alberga,et al.  A study of land cover classification using polarimetric SAR parameters , 2007 .

[57]  Eric Pottier,et al.  A review of target decomposition theorems in radar polarimetry , 1996, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[58]  E. Pottier,et al.  Polarimetric Radar Imaging: From Basics to Applications , 2009 .

[59]  R. Lawrence Rule-Based Classification Systems Using Classification and Regression Tree (CART) Analysis , 2001 .

[60]  C.F. Barnes,et al.  Late-Season Rural Land-Cover Estimation With Polarimetric-SAR Intensity Pixel Blocks and$sigma$-Tree-Structured Near-Neighbor Classifiers , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[61]  H.T. Li,et al.  Object-oriented classification of polarimetric SAR imagery based on Statistical Region Merging and Support Vector Machine , 2008, 2008 International Workshop on Earth Observation and Remote Sensing Applications.

[62]  H. Zebker,et al.  The unpolarized component in polarimetric radar observations of forested areas , 1990 .