Large-scale multiuser SM-MIMO versus massive MIMO

Spatial modulation (SM) is attractive for multi-antenna wireless communications. SM uses multiple transmit antenna elements but only one transmit radio frequency (RF) chain. In SM, in addition to the information bits conveyed through conventional modulation symbols (e.g., QAM), the index of the active transmit antenna also conveys information bits. In this paper, we establish that SM has significant signal-to-noise (SNR) advantage over conventional modulation in large-scale multiuser (multiple-input multiple-output) MIMO systems. Our new contribution in this paper addresses the key issue of large-dimension signal processing at the base station (BS) receiver (e.g., signal detection) in large-scale multiuser SM-MIMO systems, where each user is equipped with multiple transmit antennas (e.g., 2 or 4 antennas) but only one transmit RF chain, and the BS is equipped with tens to hundreds of (e.g., 128) receive antennas. Specifically, we propose two novel algorithms for detection of large-scale SM-MIMO signals at the BS; one is based on message passing and the other is based on local search. The proposed algorithms achieve very good performance and scale well. For the same spectral efficiency, multiuser SM-MIMO outperforms conventional multiuser MIMO (recently being referred to as massive MIMO) by several dBs. The SNR advantage of SM-MIMO over massive MIMO can be attributed to: (i) because of the spatial index bits, SM-MIMO can use a lower-order QAM alphabet compared to that in massive MIMO to achieve the same spectral efficiency, and (ii) for the same spectral efficiency and QAM size, massive MIMO will need more spatial streams per user which leads to increased spatial interference.

[1]  Georgios B. Giannakis,et al.  Cyclic prefixing or zero padding for wireless multicarrier transmissions? , 2002, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[2]  P. Grant,et al.  Spatial modulation for multiple-antenna wireless systems: a survey , 2011, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[3]  Harald Haas,et al.  2-User multiple access spatial modulation , 2011, 2011 IEEE GLOBECOM Workshops (GC Wkshps).

[4]  Harald Haas,et al.  Multiple access spatial modulation , 2012, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw..

[5]  B. Sundar Rajan,et al.  High-Rate Space–Time Coded Large-MIMO Systems: Low-Complexity Detection and Channel Estimation , 2008, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[6]  Lajos Hanzo,et al.  Spatial Modulation for Generalized MIMO: Challenges, Opportunities, and Implementation , 2014, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[7]  Ananthanarayanan Chockalingam,et al.  Spatial modulation and space shift keying in single carrier communication , 2012, 2012 IEEE 23rd International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications - (PIMRC).

[8]  M. Pretti A message-passing algorithm with damping , 2005 .

[9]  Erik G. Larsson,et al.  Scaling Up MIMO: Opportunities and Challenges with Very Large Arrays , 2012, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[10]  B. Sundar Rajan,et al.  A Low-Complexity Detector for Large MIMO Systems and Multicarrier CDMA Systems , 2008, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[11]  Mérouane Debbah,et al.  Massive MIMO in the UL/DL of Cellular Networks: How Many Antennas Do We Need? , 2013, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[12]  Harald Haas,et al.  Bit Error Probability of Space-Shift Keying MIMO Over Multiple-Access Independent Fading Channels , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[13]  Shuichi Ohno,et al.  Performance of Single-Carrier Block Transmissions Over Multipath Fading Channels With Linear Equalization , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.