Goodness of Prediction for Principal Components of Shape A Correlation Measure

The wide variety of statistical shape models available in image analysis and computer vision calls for some criteria and procedure to evaluate them for their effectiveness. In this paper, we introduce a formal correlation measure called goodness of prediction that allows evaluating statistical shape models in terms of their predictive power: the ability to describe an unseen member of the population. Most applications of statistical shape models such as segmentation and classification rely on their predictive power particularly heavily. The correlation measure is designed to analyze statistical shape models that use principal component analysis (PCA) to characterize shape variability. As some geometric shape representations like the m-rep do not form a vector space, the correlation measure initially defined in linear vector space is generalized to a nonlinear manifold by interpreting the measure in terms of geodesic distance in space. Through a systematic procedure for calculating the measure, we analyze the predictive power of statistical shape models as a function of training sample size. Our approach is demonstrated with two different shape representations: the Supported primarily by NCI P01 CA47982, R01 CA095749-01A1 and NIBIB EB000219 Ja-Yeon Jeong · Xiaoxiao Liu · Stephen M. Pizer Medical Image Display & Analysis Group, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC USA Ja-Yeon Jeong e-mail: jeong@cs.unc.edu, jayeon.j@gmail.com Surajit Ray Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Boston University, Boston, MA USA Qiong Han Center for Visualization & Virtual Environments Lexington, KY USA Keith E. Muller Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL USA m-rep and the point distribution model. Our experiment results show the usefulness and the benefit of our evaluation method.

[1]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  A shape-based approach to the segmentation of medical imagery using level sets , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  Dinggang Shen,et al.  Hierarchical active shape models, using the wavelet transform , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  Paul A. Yushkevich,et al.  Deformable M-Reps for 3D Medical Image Segmentation , 2003, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[4]  R. Muirhead Aspects of Multivariate Statistical Theory , 1982, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.

[5]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  MESH: measuring errors between surfaces using the Hausdorff distance , 2002, Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo.

[6]  Kathryn Leonard,et al.  Efficient Shape Modeling: ⋮-Entropy, Adaptive Coding, and Boundary Curves -vs- Blum’s Medial Axis , 2007, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[7]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active Shape Models-Their Training and Application , 1995, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[8]  Gregg Tracton,et al.  Training models of anatomic shape variability. , 2008, Medical physics.

[9]  Aaron F. Bobick,et al.  Multiscale 3D Shape Analysis Using Spherical Wavelets , 2005, MICCAI.

[10]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Geodesic Active Contours , 1995, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[11]  Edward L. Chaney,et al.  Geometrically Proper Models in Statistical Training , 2007, IPMI.

[12]  D. Kendall MORPHOMETRIC TOOLS FOR LANDMARK DATA: GEOMETRY AND BIOLOGY , 1994 .

[13]  James S. Duncan,et al.  Boundary Finding with Parametrically Deformable Models , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[14]  S. Vadlamani On the Diffusion of Shape , 2007 .

[15]  Arjun K. Gupta The Theory of Linear Models and Multivariate Analysis , 1981 .

[16]  Martin Styner,et al.  Evaluation of 3D Correspondence Methods for Model Building , 2003, IPMI.

[17]  Baba C. Vemuri,et al.  Shape Modeling with Front Propagation: A Level Set Approach , 1995, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[18]  P. Thomas Fletcher,et al.  Principal geodesic analysis for the study of nonlinear statistics of shape , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[19]  J. Damon Smoothness and geometry of boundaries associated to skeletal structures, II: Geometry in the Blum case , 2004, Compositio Mathematica.

[20]  D. Kleinbaum,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis and Multivariable Methods , 1999 .

[21]  Xianggui Qu,et al.  Linear Model Theory: Univariate, Multivariate, and Mixed Models , 2007, Technometrics.

[22]  HARRY BLUM,et al.  Shape description using weighted symmetric axis features , 1978, Pattern Recognit..

[23]  Tim K. Keyes,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis and Multivariable Methods , 2001, Technometrics.

[24]  Oscar Camara,et al.  Generalized Overlap Measures for Evaluation and Validation in Medical Image Analysis , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[25]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  Volumetric transformation of brain anatomy , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[26]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Parametrization of Closed Surfaces for 3-D Shape Description , 1995, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[27]  Edward L. Chaney,et al.  A large-to-fine-scale shape prior for probabilistic segmentations using a deformable m-rep , 2008, 2008 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops.