Do Relationships Between Environmental Attributes and Recreational Walking Vary According to Area-Level Socioeconomic Status?

Residents of areas with lower socioeconomic status (SES) are known to be less physically active during leisure time. Neighborhood walkability has been shown to be related to recreational walking equally in low and high SES areas. This cross-sectional study tested whether associations of specific environmental attributes, measured objectively and subjectively, with walking for recreation were moderated by area-level SES. The data of the North West Adelaide Health Study collected in 2007 (n = 1500, mean age 57) were used. Self-reported walking frequency was the outcome of the study. Environmental exposure measures included objectively measured walkability components (residential density, intersection density, land use mix, and net retail area ratio) and perceived attributes (access to destinations, neighborhood esthetics, walking infrastructure, traffic/barriers, and crime safety). Participants’ suburbs were categorized into low and high SES areas using an indicator of socioeconomic disadvantage. Low SES areas had lower scores in residential density, neighborhood esthetics, walking infrastructure, traffic/barriers, and crime safety. Recreational walking was associated with residential density, access to destinations, esthetics, traffic/barriers, and crime safety. Effect modification was observed for two attributes (out of nine): residential density was associated with walking only in low SES areas, while walking infrastructure was associated with walking only in high SES areas. The associations of neighborhood environmental attributes with recreational walking were largely consistent across SES groups. However, low SES areas were disadvantaged in most perceived environmental attributes related to recreational walking. Improving such attributes in low SES neighborhoods may help close socioeconomic disparities in leisure time physical activity.

[1]  Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij,et al.  Addressing overreporting on the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) telephone survey with a population sample , 2003, Public Health Nutrition.

[2]  J. Sallis,et al.  Neighborhood-based differences in physical activity: an environment scale evaluation. , 2003, American journal of public health.

[3]  G. McClelland,et al.  Designing, testing, and interpreting interactions and moderator effects in family research. , 2005, Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association.

[4]  J. Brug,et al.  Neighbourhood inequalities in physical inactivity: the role of neighbourhood attractiveness, proximity to local facilities and safety in the Netherlands. , 2005, Social science & medicine.

[5]  Anne M Kavanagh,et al.  Urban area disadvantage and physical activity: a multilevel study in Melbourne, Australia , 2005, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.

[6]  Jo Salmon,et al.  Do features of public open spaces vary according to neighbourhood socio-economic status? , 2008, Health & place.

[7]  B. Saelens,et al.  Built environment correlates of walking: a review. , 2008, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[8]  I-Min Lee,et al.  The importance of walking to public health. , 2008, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[9]  J. Salmon,et al.  Mismatch between perceived and objective measures of physical activity environments. , 2008, Preventive medicine.

[10]  J. Sallis,et al.  Neighborhood built environment and income: examining multiple health outcomes. , 2009, Social science & medicine.

[11]  Adrian Bauman,et al.  Correlates of Non-Concordance between Perceived and Objective Measures of Walkability , 2009, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[12]  R. Adams,et al.  Cohort Profile: The North West Adelaide Health Study (NWAHS). , 2009, International journal of epidemiology.

[13]  J. Sallis,et al.  The development of a walkability index: application to the Neighborhood Quality of Life Study , 2009, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[14]  N. Owen,et al.  Physical activity for recreation or exercise on neighbourhood streets: associations with perceived environmental attributes. , 2009, Health & place.

[15]  P. Zimmet,et al.  Australia: the healthiest country by 2020. National Preventative Health Strategy - the roadmap for action , 2009 .

[16]  M. Duncan,et al.  Relationships of Land Use Mix with Walking for Transport: Do Land Uses and Geographical Scale Matter? , 2010, Journal of Urban Health.

[17]  H. de Vries,et al.  Psychosocial correlates of leisure-time walking among Australian adults of lower and higher socio-economic status. , 2010, Health education research.

[18]  G. Cardon,et al.  Neighborhood SES and walkability are related to physical activity behavior in Belgian adults. , 2010, Preventive medicine.

[19]  Paula M. Cuccaro,et al.  Neighborhood characteristics favorable to outdoor physical activity: disparities by socioeconomic and racial/ethnic composition. , 2010, Health & place.

[20]  W. Brown,et al.  Neighborhood disadvantage and physical activity: baseline results from the HABITAT multilevel longitudinal study. , 2010, Annals of epidemiology.

[21]  Shigeru Inoue,et al.  Association between Perceived Neighborhood Environment and Walking among Adults in 4 Cities in Japan , 2010, Journal of epidemiology.

[22]  Takemi Sugiyama,et al.  Associations between recreational walking and attractiveness, size, and proximity of neighborhood open spaces. , 2010, American journal of public health.

[23]  Norman W. Garrick,et al.  Effect of Street Network Design on Walking and Biking , 2010 .

[24]  David B. Klenosky,et al.  Trails and physical activity: a review. , 2011, Journal of physical activity & health.

[25]  Lawrence D. Frank,et al.  Income disparities in perceived neighborhood built and social environment attributes. , 2011, Health & place.

[26]  K. Sundquist,et al.  Neighborhood walkability, physical activity, and walking behavior: the Swedish Neighborhood and Physical Activity (SNAP) study. , 2011, Social science & medicine.

[27]  E. Cerin,et al.  Walking for Recreation and Perceptions of the Neighborhood Environment in Older Chinese Urban Dwellers , 2012, Journal of Urban Health.

[28]  Daniel Arvidsson,et al.  Physical activity and concordance between objective and perceived walkability. , 2012, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[29]  Kelly R Evenson,et al.  Associations of adult physical activity with perceived safety and police-recorded crime: the Multi-ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis , 2012, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[30]  G. Lovasi,et al.  Place-focused physical activity research, human agency, and social justice in public health: taking agency seriously in studies of the built environment. , 2012, Health & place.

[31]  Lawrence D Frank,et al.  Neighborhood environment and psychosocial correlates of adults' physical activity. , 2012, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[32]  Anne W. Taylor,et al.  Associations between Resident Perceptions of the Local Residential Environment and Metabolic Syndrome , 2012, Journal of environmental and public health.

[33]  Yan Kestens,et al.  Living in a well-serviced urban area is associated with maintenance of frequent walking among seniors in the VoisiNuAge study. , 2012, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[34]  B. Giles-Corti,et al.  Can the built environment reduce health inequalities? A study of neighbourhood socioeconomic disadvantage and walking for transport. , 2013, Health & place.

[35]  Mark Livingston,et al.  "Safe Going": the influence of crime rates and perceived crime and safety on walking in deprived neighbourhoods. , 2013, Social science & medicine.

[36]  B. Giles-Corti,et al.  Does Fear of Crime Discourage Walkers? A Social-Ecological Exploration of Fear As a Deterrent to Walking , 2014 .