The ambivalence of professional identity: On cynicism and jouissance in audit firms

This article explores how identity is self-managed in professional services firms, illustrated by the Big Four audit firms. We examine both identification and distancing processes with several identity attributes of professionalism, viewed here as outcomes of technologies of the self. We argue that the ambivalence inherent in these attributes enables auditors to more or less cynically distance themselves from the regulatory structures of their environment, forming jouissance with rules and regulation. The study, empirical in nature, contributes to an understanding of the mutual constitution of power and identity in the area of employee resistance to organizational control. As distancing from the organizational culture and the professional ideology appears to be more symbolic of individual agency than truly harmful, we conclude that jouissance may potentially enhance the firms’ performance in the short term. Yet, prolonged cynical attitudes may transform professionals into ‘compliant’ employees, who may not be inclined to challenge issues that can have negative consequences for the firm/profession and/or the public.

[1]  A. Coffey,et al.  `Timing is Everything'; Graduate Accountants, Time and Organizational Commitment , 1994 .

[2]  Christopher Grey,et al.  On being a professional in a "Big Six" firm , 1998 .

[3]  M. Alvesson,et al.  Identity regulation as organizational control: Producing the appropriate individual , 2002 .

[4]  Bill Lee,et al.  PROFESSIONAL SOCIALISATION, COMMERCIAL PRESSURES AND JUNIOR STAFF'S TIME-PRESSURED IRREGULAR AUDITING—A CONTEXTUAL INTERPRETATION , 2002 .

[5]  Gareth R. Jones,et al.  The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork , 1998 .

[6]  Mark W. Dirsmith,et al.  Informal communications, nonformal communications and mentoring in public accounting firms , 1985 .

[7]  G. Ritzer,et al.  The Sociology of the Professions , 1988 .

[8]  David Knights,et al.  `Are there no Limits to Authority?': TQM and Organizational Power , 1999 .

[9]  Peter Sloterdijk.  Critique of Cynical Reason , 1983 .

[10]  Michel Foucault,et al.  The use of pleasure , 1985 .

[11]  Yiannis Gabriel.  The Unmanaged Organization: Stories, Fantasies and Subjectivity , 1995 .

[12]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Sedimentation and Transformation in Organizational Change: The Case of Canadian Law Firms , 1996 .

[13]  E. Michael Bamber,et al.  Big 5 Auditors' Professional and Organizational Identification: Consistency or Conflict? , 2002 .

[14]  M. Bullimore.  The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Centre of Political Ontology , 2002 .

[15]  S. Žižek.  The sublime object of ideology , 1989 .

[16]  David Knights,et al.  Writing Organizational Analysis into Foucault , 2002 .

[17]  C. Edward Arrington,et al.  Accounting in other wor(l)ds: a feminism without reserve , 1993 .

[18]  Brian T. Pentland,et al.  Getting comfortable with the numbers: Auditing and the micro-production of macro-order , 1993 .

[19]  D. Hawkes.  Ideology, second edition , 2004 .

[20]  D. C. Feldman,et al.  The Dilbert Syndrome , 2000 .

[21]  K. Starkey,et al.  Foucault, management and organization theory : from panopticon to technologies of self , 2000 .

[22]  Olivier Herrbach.  The art of compromise? The individual and organisational legitimacy of “irregular auditing” , 2005 .

[23]  J P Bunker,et al.  Professionalism Reborn: Theory, Prophecy, and Policy , 1994 .

[24]  Jennifer Reingold,et al.  Final Accounting: Ambition, Greed and the Fall of Arthur Andersen , 2003 .

[25]  B. Townley.  `Know Thyself': Self-Awareness, Self-Formation and Managing , 1995 .

[26]  Olivier Herrbach,et al.  Audit quality, auditor behaviour and the psychological contract , 2001 .

[27]  N. Crump,et al.  Dionysus at work? The ethos of play and the ethos of management , 2005 .

[28]  Timothy Bewes.  Cynicism and Postmodernity , 1997 .

[29]  M. Foucault,et al.  Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault , 1988 .

[30]  N. Denzin,et al.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 1994 .

[31]  Katarzyna Kosmala Maclullich.  THE EMPEROR’S ‘NEW’ CLOTHES? NEW AUDIT REGIMES: INSIGHTS FROM FOUCAULT’S TECHNOLOGIES OF THE SELF , 2003 .

[32]  S. Žižek.  The ticklish subject : the absent centre of political ontology , 1999 .

[33]  Mark W. Dirsmith,et al.  The Calculated and the Avowed: Techniques of Discipline and Struggles over Identity in Big Six Public Accounting Firms , 1998 .

[34]  S. Walker.  The genesis of professional organisation in English accountancy , 2004 .

[35]  Eliot Freidson,et al.  Professionalism Reborn: Theory, Prophecy and Policy , 1994 .

[36]  F. Anderson-Gough,et al.  Accounting professionals and the accounting profession: linking conduct and context , 2002 .

[37]  Gerard Hanlon,et al.  The Commercialisation of Accountancy: Flexible Accumulation and the Transformation of the Service Class , 1994 .

[38]  P. Fleming,et al.  Working at a Cynical Distance: Implications for Power, Subjectivity and Resistance , 2003 .

[39]  Ken Starkey,et al.  The Long Detour: Foucault's History of Desire and Pleasure , 2002 .

[40]  E. Goffman.  The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[41]  Katarzyna Kosmala.  Insights From Ricoeur’s Hermeneutics on Best Practice In Professional Service Firms: On Perpetual Myth Creation? , 2005, Qualitative Sociology Review.

[42]  G. Burrell.  No accounting for sexuality , 1987 .

[43]  E. Wray-Bliss.  Abstract Ethics, Embodied Ethics: The Strange Marriage of Foucault and Positivism in Labour Process Theory , 2002 .

[44]  C. McNair.  Proper compromises: The management control dilemma in public accounting and its impact on auditor behavior☆ , 1991 .

[45]  M. Foucault.  Technologies of the Self , 1988 .

[46]  B. Townley.  Beyond Good and Evil: Depth and Division in the Management of Human Resources , 1998 .