An inventory of ready-to-use and publicly available tools for the safety assessment of nanomaterials

Legislation addressing environmental, health and safety aspects of nanomaterials in consumer products and ensuring their safe use is being continuously updated in the European Union and globally. This leads to a growing need for tools to implement this developing legislation. A freely accessible inventory of ready-to-use and publicly available tools that together cover the tasks within a nanomaterial safety assessment process was built in the presented work. This inventory is a unique metadata set in Excel® format: the ‘NANoREG Toolbox’, which assembles information needed for selecting and accessing instruments that meet specific goals. The recorded tools are categorised according to their purpose, type and regulatory status. The Toolbox covers an unprecedented and broad range of over 500 current tools, developed in Europe and beyond. While NANoREG focussed on safety assessment under the EU Regulation on Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), the instruments in the Toolbox are relevant and useful for nanomaterial safety assessments worldwide.

[1]  Type.  Operating Instructions , 2006 .

[2]  Sagar Kamarthi,et al.  Review of Research Trends and Methods in Nano Environmental, Health, and Safety Risk Analysis , 2016, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[3]  Hubert Rauscher.  CHAPTER 2:The Devil is in the Definition , 2017 .

[4]  David B Warheit,et al.  How meaningful are the results of nanotoxicity studies in the absence of adequate material characterization? , 2008, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[5]  Steffen Foss Hansen,et al.  Control banding tools for occupational exposure assessment of nanomaterials — Ready for use in a regulatory context? , 2016 .

[6]  Anders Baun,et al.  Techniques and Protocols for Dispersing Nanoparticle Powders in Aqueous Media—Is there a Rationale for Harmonization? , 2015, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews.

[7]  Gibson Peter,et al.  Towards a review of the EC Recommendation for a definition of the term "nanomaterial": Part 3: Scientific-technical evaluation of options to clarify the definition and to facilitate its implementation , 2015 .

[8]  Qasim Chaudhry,et al.  Nanotechnologies in food , 2017 .

[9]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Sustainable nanotechnology decision support system: bridging risk management, sustainable innovation and risk governance , 2016, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[10]  Nathalie Tufenkji,et al.  The road to nowhere: equilibrium partition coefficients for nanoparticles , 2014 .

[11]  Birgit Sokull-Klüttgen,et al.  Regulatory Aspects of Nanomaterials in the EU , 2017 .

[12]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Risk-Based and Prevention-Based Governance for Emerging Materials. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[13]  Enrico Burello,et al.  Review of (Q)SAR models for regulatory assessment of nanomaterials risks , 2017 .

[14]  R. Munro,et al.  Porosity and Specific Surface Area Measurements for Solid Materials , 2017 .

[15]  Peter Kearns,et al.  Physico-chemical properties of manufactured nanomaterials - Characterisation and relevant methods. An outlook based on the OECD Testing Programme , 2018, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[16]  Richard Russell,et al.  Environmental Health and Safety Research Needs for Engineered Nanoscale Materials , 2006 .

[17]  D. Warheit,et al.  Health effects related to nanoparticle exposures: environmental, health and safety considerations for assessing hazards and risks. , 2008, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[18]  Susan Wijnhoven,et al.  Risk assessment frameworks for nanomaterials: Scope, link to regulations, applicability, and outline for future directions in view of needed increase in efficiency , 2018 .

[19]  Gibson Peter,et al.  Requirements on measurements for the implementation of the European Commission definition of the term 'nanomaterial' , 2012 .

[20]  Phil Sayre,et al.  Review of achievements of the OECD Working Party on Manufactured Nanomaterials' Testing and Assessment Programme. From exploratory testing to test guidelines. , 2016, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[21]  David Julian McClements,et al.  Is nano safe in foods? Establishing the factors impacting the gastrointestinal fate and toxicity of organic and inorganic food-grade nanoparticles , 2017, npj Science of Food.

[22]  Riego Sintes Juan,et al.  NANoREG framework for the safety assessment of nanomaterials , 2017 .

[23]  Lang Tran,et al.  Safe handling of nanotechnology , 2006, Nature.

[24]  N Oreskes,et al.  Verification, Validation, and Confirmation of Numerical Models in the Earth Sciences , 1994, Science.

[25]  Bernd Nowack,et al.  Evaluation of environmental exposure models for engineered nanomaterials in a regulatory context , 2017 .

[26]  Maria Dusinska,et al.  Research priorities relevant to development or updating of nano-relevant regulations and guidelines , 2017 .

[27]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Environmental risk analysis for nanomaterials: Review and evaluation of frameworks , 2012, Nanotoxicology.

[28]  Fadri Gottschalk,et al.  Environmental concentrations of engineered nanomaterials: review of modeling and analytical studies. , 2013, Environmental pollution.

[29]  Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment , 2008 .

[30]  Appendix R.6-1 for nanomaterials applicable to the Guidance on QSARs and Grouping of Chemicals , 2017 .

[31]  Riego Sintes Juan,et al.  NANoREG harmonised terminology for environmental health and safety assessment of nanomaterials , 2016 .

[32]  G. Oberdörster,et al.  Nanotoxicology: An Emerging Discipline Evolving from Studies of Ultrafine Particles , 2005, Environmental health perspectives.

[33]  Lang Tran,et al.  ITS-NANO - Prioritising nanosafety research to develop a stakeholder driven intelligent testing strategy , 2014, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[34]  James Baker,et al.  Towards a more effective and efficient governance and regulation of nanomaterials , 2017, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[35]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Risk associated with engineered nanomaterials: Different tools for different ways to govern , 2018, Nano Today.

[36]  Igor Linkov,et al.  The Essential Elements of a Risk Governance Framework for Current and Future Nanotechnologies , 2018, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[37]  Elijah J Petersen,et al.  Nanomaterials in the aquatic environment: A European Union–United States perspective on the status of ecotoxicity testing, research priorities, and challenges ahead , 2016, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[38]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  Setting the stage for debating the roles of risk assessment and life-cycle assessment of engineered nanomaterials. , 2017, Nature nanotechnology.

[39]  Klaus Günter Steinhäuser,et al.  Methods and data for regulatory risk assessment of nanomaterials: Questions for an expert consultation , 2017 .

[40]  Gibson Peter,et al.  Towards a review of the EC Recommendation for a definition of the term "nanomaterial"Part 2: Assessment of collected information concerning the experience with the defintion , 2014 .

[41]  Antonio Marcomini,et al.  Risk assessment of engineered nanomaterials: a review of available data and approaches from a regulatory perspective , 2012, Nanotoxicology.

[42]  Michael T. Postek,et al.  Nanoscale reference materials for environmental, health and safety measurements: needs, gaps and opportunities , 2012, Nanotoxicology.

[43]  James H. Lambert,et al.  Comparative, collaborative, and integrative risk governance for emerging technologies , 2018, Environment Systems and Decisions.

[44]  Bengt Fadeel,et al.  Advanced tools for the safety assessment of nanomaterials , 2018, Nature Nanotechnology.

[45]  Klaus Günter Steinhäuser,et al.  Reliability of methods and data for regulatory assessment of nanomaterial risks , 2017 .

[46]  Antonio Marcomini,et al.  Frameworks and tools for risk assessment of manufactured nanomaterials. , 2016, Environment international.