Genotype by environment interactions in winter survival in red deer

1.  The extent to which environmental heterogeneity interacts with genetic hetero geneity to affect individual fitness within populations has the potential to affect the dynamics of natural populations and the amount of genetic variation maintained in natural populations, yet is a relatively poorly investigated topic in either ecology or evolutionary biology. 2.  Many individual-based studies are precluded from such investigations by the practical problems of measuring heritability of traits affecting fitness and the difficulties of experimental manipulation of the study population. One way of demonstrating how commonly genotype by environmental interactions affect fitness, though not their overall importance in determining fitness, is to investigate fitness in a population subdivided by genotype at one or more marker loci. 3.  We analyse data on calf winter survival from a population of red deer from the Isle of Rum, Scotland. Data on individual survival, environmental fluctuations and genotype at 13 loci were collected from 1982 to 1994. 4.  We found associations between survival over the first winter of life and calf genotype at two out of three allozyme loci and five out of 10 microsatellite loci. All of the results remained significant under randomization tests. Other genotypes that initially appeared to have an association with survival were rejected when bootstrapped, usually due to insufficient data or anomalies in the data. 5.  Our results suggest that associations between fitness and genotype are common. Five out of the seven associations found involved interactions with environmental variables. Four of these showed density-dependent selection with different genotypes showing high survival at high population size compared to low population size and one interacted with autumn rainfall. In a sixth case, genotype interacted with sex.

[1]  M. Begon,et al.  Ecology: Individuals, Populations and Communities, 3rd edn. , 1997 .

[2]  T. Schoener,et al.  Adaptive differentiation following experimental island colonization in Anolis lizards , 1997, nature.

[3]  Tim Coulson,et al.  POPULATION SUBSTRUCTURE, LOCAL DENSITY, AND CALF WINTER SURVIVAL IN RED DEER (CERVUS ELAPHUS) , 1997 .

[4]  E. Nevo,et al.  Selection versus random drift: long–term polymorphism persistence in small populations (evidence and modelling) , 1997 .

[5]  T. C. Marshall,et al.  The maintenance of genetic polymorphism in small island populations: large mammals in the Hebrides. , 1996, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[6]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Density-dependent selection in a fluctuating ungulate population , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  Hiroshi Akashi,et al.  Molecular Evidence for Natural Selection , 1995 .

[8]  B. Grant,et al.  PREDICTING MICROEVOLUTIONARY RESPONSES TO DIRECTIONAL SELECTION ON HERITABLE VARIATION , 1995, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[9]  H. B. Wilson,et al.  Using spatio-temporal chaos and intermediate-scale determinism to quantify spatially extended ecosystems , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  S. Albon,et al.  Structured accounting of the variance of demographic change , 1993 .

[11]  B. Grant,et al.  Evolution of Darwin’s finches caused by a rare climatic event , 1993, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Density-Dependent Changes in the Spacing Behaviour of Female Kin in Red Deer , 1992 .

[13]  Peter R. Grant,et al.  NATURAL SELECTION AND DARWIN'S FINCHES , 1991 .

[14]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  COUNTERVAILING SELECTION IN DIFFERENT FITNESS COMPONENTS IN FEMALE RED DEER , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[15]  J. Endler Ecology and natural selection , 1990 .

[16]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Fitness costs of gestation and lactation in wild mammals , 1989, Nature.

[17]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  GENETIC VARIATION AND JUVENILE SURVIVAL IN RED DEER , 1988, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[18]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Interactions Between Population Density and Maternal Characteristics Affecting Fecundity and Juvenile Survival in Red Deer , 1987 .

[19]  J. Endler Natural selection in the wild , 1987 .

[20]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Sexual segregation and density-related changes in habitat use in male and female Red deer (Cerrus elaphus) , 1987 .

[21]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Early development and population dynamics in red deer. II: Density-independent effects and cohort variation , 1987 .

[22]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Early development and population dynamics in red deer. I: Density-dependent effects on juvenile survival , 1987 .

[23]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Parental investment and sex differences in juvenile mortality in birds and mammals , 1985, Nature.

[24]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Winter mortality in Red deer (Cervus elaphus) , 1982 .

[25]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Factors affecting calf mortality in red deer (Cervus elaphus) , 1978 .

[26]  F. Ayala Genotype, environment, and population numbers. , 1968, Science.

[27]  J. Endler Multiple-trait coevolution and environmental gradients in guppies. , 1995, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[28]  J. Gillespie The causes of molecular evolution , 1991 .

[29]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Red deer in the Highlands , 1989 .

[30]  R. Ben-Shlomo,et al.  The Evolutionary Significance of Genetic Diversity: Ecological, Demographic and Life History Correlates , 1984 .