Comparison of 30-day perioperative outcomes in adults undergoing open versus minimally invasive pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: analysis of 593 patients in a prospective national database

[1]  P. Dasgupta,et al.  Management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in adults , 2014, Nature Reviews Urology.

[2]  Francesco Montorsi,et al.  Effect of minimally invasive surgery on the risk for surgical site infections: results from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Database. , 2014, JAMA surgery.

[3]  J. Casey,et al.  Contemporary national comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted laparoscopic pediatric pyeloplasty. , 2014, Journal of pediatric urology.

[4]  J. Sammon,et al.  Minimally invasive vs open pyeloplasty in children: the differential effect of procedure volume on operative outcomes. , 2014, Urology.

[5]  Pierre I Karakiewicz,et al.  Morbidity and mortality after benign prostatic hyperplasia surgery: data from the American College of Surgeons national surgical quality improvement program. , 2014, Journal of endourology.

[6]  M. Menon,et al.  Correction of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children: national trends and comparative effectiveness in operative outcomes. , 2014, Journal of endourology.

[7]  Steven L. Chang,et al.  National trends of perioperative outcomes and costs for open, laparoscopic and robotic pediatric pyeloplasty. , 2014, The Journal of urology.

[8]  Sachin Kathuria,et al.  Defining the Pros and Cons of Open, Conventional Laparoscopy, and Robot-Assisted Pyeloplasty in a Developing Nation , 2014, Advances in urology.

[9]  H. Morgenstern,et al.  Trends in the treatment of adults with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. , 2013, Journal of endourology.

[10]  M. Menon,et al.  National trends and disparities in the use of minimally invasive adult pyeloplasty. , 2012, The Journal of urology.

[11]  J. Donohue,et al.  How best to measure surgical quality? Comparison of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Safety Indicators (AHRQ-PSI) and the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) postoperative adverse events at a single institution. , 2011, Surgery.

[12]  Liduan Zheng,et al.  Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2011, Journal of endourology.

[13]  C. Lallas,et al.  The minimally invasive management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in horseshoe kidneys , 2011, World Journal of Urology.

[14]  Shilpi Gupta,et al.  Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: experience with 142 cases in a high-volume center. , 2010, Journal of endourology.

[15]  H. Sayles,et al.  Incidence of Surgical Site Infection Associated with Robotic Surgery , 2009, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[16]  Ashok K. Hemal,et al.  Robotic management of complicated ureteropelvic junction obstruction , 2010, World Journal of Urology.

[17]  Ninh T. Nguyen,et al.  Laparoscopic surgery significantly reduces surgical-site infections compared with open surgery , 2010, Surgical Endoscopy.

[18]  C. Holsapple,et al.  Assessing Surgical Quality Using Administrative and Clinical Data Sets: A Direct Comparison of the University HealthSystem Consortium Clinical Database and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Data Set , 2009, American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality.

[19]  He Wang,et al.  Cytokine responses following laparoscopic or open pyeloplasty in children , 2009, Surgical Endoscopy.

[20]  A. Hoznek,et al.  Analysis of complications from 600 retroperitoneoscopic procedures of the upper urinary tract during the last 10 years , 2008, World Journal of Urology.

[21]  M. Reddy,et al.  Laparoscopic pyeloplasty compared with open pyeloplasty in children. , 2007, Journal of endourology.

[22]  Hauke Winter,et al.  Immunological effects of laparoscopic vs open colorectal surgery: a prospective clinical study. , 2005, Archives of surgery.

[23]  R. Clayman.  Comparison of open versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty techniques in treatment of uretero-pelvic junction obstruction. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[24]  S. Herrell,et al.  A clinical pathway for laparoscopic pyeloplasty decreases length of stay. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[25]  A. Basiri,et al.  A comparison between laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty in patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. , 2004, Urology journal.

[26]  M. Treat,et al.  Postoperative cell mediated immune response is better preserved after laparoscopic vs open colorectal resection in humans , 2003, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[27]  H. Yamaue,et al.  Effectiveness of the clinical pathway to decrease length of stay and cost for laparoscopic surgery , 2002, Surgical Endoscopy.

[28]  B. Wolfe,et al.  Systemic stress response after laparoscopic and open gastric bypass. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[29]  D. Bloom,et al.  The pathophysiology of UPJ obstruction. Current concepts. , 1998, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[30]  L. Kavoussi,et al.  Comparison of open and endourologic approaches to the obstructed ureteropelvic junction. , 1995, Urology.

[31]  J Gibbs,et al.  The National Veterans Administration Surgical Risk Study: risk adjustment for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[32]  G. Preminger,et al.  Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. , 1993, The Journal of urology.

[33]  J. C. Anderson,et al.  RETROCAVAL URETER:A Case diagnosed pre‐operatively and treated successfully by a Plastic Operation , 1949 .