Integrated assessment of safety distances for rescue work in chemical plant fires involving domino effects

This study employed the Suite for the Assessment of Flammable, Explosive, and Toxic Impacts to synergize the environmental data, risk frequency, and physical and chemical properties of chemical‐induced fires and explosions at accident sites and thereby establish an integrated assessment model. In addition, the suite was used to visualize fires and explosions resulting from domino effects caused by thermal radiation and blast overpressure in initial accidents at chemical plants.

[1]  Orhan Durgun,et al.  Experimental investigation of n-butanol/diesel fuel blends and n-butanol fumigation – Evaluation of engine performance, exhaust emissions, heat release and flammability analysis , 2015 .

[2]  He-Da Zhang,et al.  Characteristics of hazardous chemical accidents in China: A statistical investigation , 2012 .

[3]  Bing Wang,et al.  The real-time estimation of hazardous gas dispersion by the integration of gas detectors, neural network and gas dispersion models. , 2015, Journal of hazardous materials.

[4]  Andrew Williamson,et al.  Modelling of time-varying dispersion for elevated pressurised releases without rainout , 2015 .

[5]  G L L Reniers,et al.  Management of evacuation in case of fire accidents in chemical industrial areas. , 2007, Journal of hazardous materials.

[6]  Clément Lenoble,et al.  An international comparison of four quantitative risk assessment approaches—A benchmark study based on a fictitious LPG plant , 2012 .

[7]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Safety assessment in plant layout design using indexing approach: implementing inherent safety perspective. Part 2-Domino Hazard Index and case study. , 2008, Journal of hazardous materials.

[8]  Kejian Song,et al.  Full‐scale experiments to study shock waves generated by the rupture of a high‐pressure pipeline , 2016 .

[9]  Nima Khakzad,et al.  Security risk assessment and management in chemical plants: Challenges and new trends , 2018 .

[10]  Alexandre Landesmann,et al.  Thermal performance-based analysis of minimum safe distances between fuel storage tanks exposed to fire , 2014 .

[11]  Paul Baybutt The treatment of domino effects in process hazard analysis , 2015 .

[12]  Ji Wang,et al.  Risk assessment for fire and explosion accidents of steel oil tanks using improved AHP based on FTA , 2016 .

[13]  Zorka Novac Pintarič Assessment of the Consequences of Accident Scenarios Involving Dangerous Substances , 2007 .

[14]  Stanley S. Grossel Guidelines for Fire Protection in Chemical, Petrochemical, and Hydrocarbon Processing FacilitiesCenter for Chemical Process Safety of the AIChE CCPS/AIChE, New York, NY, 2003, 460 pages, US$ 169.00 , 2004 .

[15]  Chris Devlin,et al.  Beyond HAZOP and LOPA: Four different company approaches , 2017 .

[16]  Jan F. Stene,et al.  Modelling and validation of atmospheric expansion and near-field dispersion for pressurised vapour or two-phase releases , 2017 .

[17]  Vikram Garaniya,et al.  A network based approach to envisage potential accidents in offshore process facilities , 2017 .

[18]  Joaquim Casal,et al.  Jet fires and the domino effect , 2008 .

[19]  En Sup Yoon,et al.  Quantitative risk analysis of fire and explosion on the top-side LNG-liquefaction process of LNG-FPSO , 2014 .

[20]  Asit Kumar Patra Influence of wind speed profile and roughness parameters on the downwind extension of vulnerable zones during dispersion of toxic dense gases , 2006 .

[21]  Margreet Spoelstra,et al.  Domino effects at LPG and propane storage sites in the Netherlands , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[22]  Faisal Khan,et al.  An integrated approach for fire and explosion consequence modelling , 2013 .

[23]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  The quantitative assessment of domino effect caused by overpressure. Part II. Case studies. , 2004, Journal of hazardous materials.

[24]  Xinming Qian,et al.  Long-term consequence and vulnerability assessment of thermal radiation hazard from LNG explosive fireball in open space based on full-scale experiment and PHAST , 2017 .

[25]  Joaquim Casal,et al.  Domino effect in chemical accidents: main features and accident sequences. , 2010, Journal of hazardous materials.

[26]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Prevention of domino effect: from active and passive strategies to inherently safer design. , 2007, Journal of hazardous materials.

[27]  Indra Mani Mishra,et al.  Fire and explosion hazard analysis during surface transport of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG): A case study of LPG truck tanker accident in Kannur, Kerala, India , 2016 .

[28]  Juan C. Ramirez,et al.  Domino effect in a catastrophic solid oxidizer fire , 2015 .

[29]  Norberto Piccinini Dust explosion in a wool factory : Origin, dynamics and consequences , 2008 .

[30]  Wei Xu,et al.  A technique to control major hazards of the coal gasification process developed from critical events and safety barriers , 2017 .

[31]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  The development of an inherent safety approach to the prevention of domino accidents. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[32]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Escalation thresholds in the assessment of domino accidental events. , 2006, Journal of hazardous materials.

[33]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  The quantitative assessment of domino effects caused by overpressure. Part I. Probit models. , 2004, Journal of hazardous materials.

[34]  Elsa Pastor,et al.  Analysis of domino effect in pipelines. , 2015, Journal of hazardous materials.

[35]  Hans J. Pasman,et al.  Risk evaluation in Dutch land-use planning , 2014 .