Costly myths: An analysis of idling beliefs and behavior in personal motor vehicles $

Despite the large contribution of individuals and households to climate change, little has been done in the US to reduce the CO2 emissions attributable to this sector. Motor vehicle idling among individual private citizens is one behavior that may be amenable to large-scale policy interventions. Currently, little data are available to quantify the potential reductions in emissions that could be realized by successful policy interventions. In addition, little is known about the motivations and beliefs that underlie idling. In the fall of 2007, 1300 drivers in the US were surveyed to assess typical idling practices, beliefs and motivations. Results indicate that the average individual idled for over 16 min a day and believed that a vehicle can be idled for at least 3.6 min before it is better to turn it off. Those who held inaccurate beliefs idled, on average, over 1 min longer than the remainder of the sample. These data suggest that idling accounts for over 93 MMt of CO2 and 10.6 billion gallons (40.1 billion liters) of gasoline a year, equaling 1.6% of all US emissions. Much of this idling is unnecessary and economically disadvantageous to drivers. The policy implications of these findings are discussed.

[1]  E. Rosa,et al.  STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts , 2003 .

[2]  Glenda Wall Barriers to Individual Environmental Action: The Influence of Attitudes and Social Experiences† , 2008 .

[3]  Junya Tanaka,et al.  Fuel Consumption Improvement of Vehicles by Idling Stop , 2004 .

[4]  K. Ueda,et al.  Idling Stop System Coupled with Quick Start Features of Gasoline Direct Injection , 2001 .

[5]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Bridging Environmental Science with Environmental Policy: Plasticity of Population, Affluence, and Technology , 2002 .

[6]  Stuart Oskamp,et al.  Who recycles and when? A review of personal and situational factors , 1995 .

[7]  W. Patterson Energy policy , 1978, Nature.

[8]  F. Kaiser,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL ATTITUDE AND ECOLOGICAL BEHAVIOUR , 1999 .

[9]  G. T. Gardner,et al.  The Short List: The Most Effective Actions U.S. Households Can Take to Curb Climate Change , 2008 .

[10]  R. Gifford,et al.  Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior : Predicting the Use of Public Transportation ' , 2002 .

[11]  Shui Bin,et al.  Consumer lifestyle approach to US energy use and the related CO2 emissions , 2005 .

[12]  H Christopher Frey,et al.  On-Road Measurement of Vehicle Tailpipe Emissions Using a Portable Instrument , 2003, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[13]  M. Conner,et al.  Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior: A Review and Avenues for Further Research , 1998 .

[14]  J. Palutikof,et al.  Climate change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Summary for Policymakers. , 2007 .

[15]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  A power primer. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  Jonathan M. Gilligan,et al.  Individual Carbon Emissions: The Low-Hanging Fruit , 2008 .

[17]  End Use,et al.  International energy annual , 1993 .

[18]  Gary T. Henry,et al.  Driving less for better air: Impacts of a public information campaign , 2003 .

[19]  M. Vandenbergh The Carbon-Neutral Individual , 2007 .