Health outcome prioritization to elicit preferences of older persons with multiple health conditions.

OBJECTIVE To develop and test a simple tool to elicit the preferences of older persons based on prioritization of universal health outcomes. METHODS Persons age ≥ 65 participating in a larger study were asked to rank 4 outcomes on a visual analogue scale: (1) maintaining independence, (2) staying alive, (3) reducing/eliminating pain, (4) reducing/eliminating other symptoms. RESULTS Interviewers rated 73% of the 81 participants as having good to excellent understanding, and cognitive interviews demonstrated the tool captured how participants thought about trade-offs. Test-retest reliability was fair to poor for ranking most of the outcomes as either most or least important (kappa .28-1.0). Patient characteristics associated with ranking "keeping you alive" as most important have been shown to be associated with a preference for life-sustaining treatment, a related construct. There was substantial variability in the outcome ranked as most important. CONCLUSIONS The task of ranking 4 universal health outcomes was well understood, captured what was important when considering trade-offs, and demonstrated content validity. However, test-retest reliability was fair to poor.

[1]  J. Dolan,et al.  Patients were more consistent in randomized trial at prioritizing childbirth preferences using graphic-numeric than verbal formats. , 2009, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[2]  M. Tinetti,et al.  Health Outcome Priorities Among Competing Cardiovascular, Fall Injury, and Medication‐Related Symptom Outcomes , 2008, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[3]  M. Tinetti,et al.  Views of older adults on patient participation in medication-related decision making , 2006, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[4]  J. Grisso,et al.  Nursing home residents' preferences for life-sustaining treatments. , 1995, JAMA.

[5]  J. Morse,et al.  Qualitative Research Methods for Health Professionals , 1995 .

[6]  J. Garrett,et al.  Stability of Choices about Life-Sustaining Treatments , 1994, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[7]  D. Feeny,et al.  The Health Utilities Index (HUI®): concepts, measurement properties and applications , 2003, Health and quality of life outcomes.

[8]  R. Spitzer,et al.  The Patient Health Questionnaire-2: Validity of a Two-Item Depression Screener , 2003, Medical care.

[9]  L. Goldman,et al.  Patient Age and Decisions To Withhold Life-Sustaining Treatments from Seriously Ill, Hospitalized Adults , 1999, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[10]  B. Starfield,et al.  Prevalence, expenditures, and complications of multiple chronic conditions in the elderly. , 2002, Archives of internal medicine.

[11]  M. Lawton,et al.  Assessment of Older People: Self-Maintaining and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living , 1969 .

[12]  A. Wu,et al.  Clinical practice guidelines and quality of care for older patients with multiple comorbid diseases: implications for pay for performance. , 2005, JAMA.

[13]  James G. Dolan,et al.  Randomized Controlled Trial of a Patient Decision Aid for Colorectal Cancer Screening , 2002, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[14]  J. Tulsky,et al.  Racial differences in hospice revocation to pursue aggressive care. , 2008, Archives of internal medicine.

[15]  Leslie Lenert,et al.  Validity and Interpretation of Preference-Based Measures of Health-Related Quality of Life , 2000, Medical care.

[16]  J. Garrett,et al.  Life-sustaining treatments during terminal illness , 1993, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[17]  C. Ritchie Health care quality and multimorbidity: the jury is still out. , 2007, Medical care.

[18]  M. Tinetti,et al.  Potential pitfalls of disease-specific guidelines for patients with multiple conditions. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  M. Tinetti,et al.  Views of Older Persons with Multiple Morbidities on Competing Outcomes and Clinical Decision‐Making , 2008, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.