Compared to men, women view professional advancement as equally attainable, but less desirable

Significance We identify a profound and consistent gender gap in people’s core life goals. Across nine studies using diverse sample populations (executives in high-power positions, recent graduates of a top MBA program, undergraduate students, and online panels of working adults) and over 4,000 participants, we find that, compared to men, women have a higher number of life goals, place less importance on power-related goals, associate more negative outcomes (e.g., time constraints and tradeoffs) with high-power positions, perceive power as less desirable, and are less likely to take advantage of opportunities for professional advancement. Women view high-level positions as equally attainable as men do, but less desirable. Our findings advance the science of gender, goals, organizational behavior, and decision making. Women are underrepresented in most high-level positions in organizations. Though a great deal of research has provided evidence that bias and discrimination give rise to and perpetuate this gender disparity, in the current research we explore another explanation: men and women view professional advancement differently, and their views affect their decisions to climb the corporate ladder (or not). In studies 1 and 2, when asked to list their core goals in life, women listed more life goals overall than men, and a smaller proportion of their goals related to achieving power at work. In studies 3 and 4, compared to men, women viewed high-level positions as less desirable yet equally attainable. In studies 5–7, when faced with the possibility of receiving a promotion at their current place of employment or obtaining a high-power position after graduating from college, women and men anticipated similar levels of positive outcomes (e.g., prestige and money), but women anticipated more negative outcomes (e.g., conflict and tradeoffs). In these studies, women associated high-level positions with conflict, which explained the relationship between gender and the desirability of professional advancement. Finally, in studies 8 and 9, men and women alike rated power as one of the main consequences of professional advancement. Our findings reveal that men and women have different perceptions of what the experience of holding a high-level position will be like, with meaningful implications for the perpetuation of the gender disparity that exists at the top of organizational hierarchies.

[1]  Robert A Emmons,et al.  The Psychology of Ultimate Concerns: Motivation and Spirituality in Personality , 1999 .

[2]  Janet K. Swim,et al.  Perceived Versus Meta-Analytic Effect Sizes: An Assessment of the Accuracy of Gender Stereotypes , 1994 .

[3]  Eric Luis Uhlmann,et al.  Can an Angry Woman Get Ahead? , 2008, Psychological science.

[4]  A. Eagly,et al.  Gender and aggressive behavior: a meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. , 1986, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  C. Hakim.  Women, careers, and work-life preferences , 2006 .

[6]  E. Paluck,et al.  The contingent smile: a meta-analysis of sex differences in smiling. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  Muriel Niederle,et al.  Gender, Competitiveness and Career Choices , 2012 .

[8]  Robert A Emmons.  Personal strivings: An approach to personality and subjective well-being. , 1986 .

[9]  M. Heilman,et al.  Gender Stereotypes in the Workplace: Obstacles to Women's Career Progress , 2007 .

[10]  V. Brescoll,et al.  Who Takes the Floor and Why , 2011 .

[11]  J. Archer.  Does sexual selection explain human sex differences in aggression? , 2009, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[12]  S. Karau,et al.  Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: a meta-analysis. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  Catherine Hakim,et al.  Work-Lifestyle Choices in the 21st Century: Preference Theory , 2002 .

[14]  Laurie A. Rudman,et al.  Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: the hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  Paul Karoly,et al.  A goal systems-self-regulatory perspective on personality, psychopathology, and change. , 1999 .

[16]  Alice H. Eagly,et al.  Gender Stereotypes Are Alive, Well, and Busy Producing Workplace Discrimination , 2008, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

[17]  R. Dick,et al.  Gender Differences in Leadership Role Occupancy: The Mediating Role of Power Motivation , 2014 .

[18]  Robert A Emmons.  Personal goals, life meaning, and virtue: Wellsprings of a positive life. , 2003 .

[19]  Lei Lai,et al.  Social incentives for gender differences in the propensity to initiate negotiations: Sometimes it does hurt to ask , 2007 .

[20]  S. Karau,et al.  Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. , 2002, Psychological review.

[21]  Erica Frank,et al.  The Second Shift , 2002 .

[22]  Florence Geis,et al.  Nonverbal affect responses to male and female leaders: Implications for leadership evaluations. , 1990 .

[23]  David Lubinski,et al.  Work preferences, life values, and personal views of top math/science graduate students and the profoundly gifted: Developmental changes and gender differences during emerging adulthood and parenthood. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  Laura Huang,et al.  Investors prefer entrepreneurial ventures pitched by attractive men , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  A. Eagly,et al.  Gender and helping behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. , 1986, Psychological bulletin.

[26]  Laurie A. Rudman,et al.  Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. , 2012 .

[27]  M. Mason,et al.  Male Susceptibility to Attentional Capture by Power Cues , 2010 .

[28]  Steven J. Karau,et al.  Gender and the emergence of leaders : a meta-analysis , 1991 .

[29]  C. Keating,et al.  The relationship of social power to visual displays of dominance between men and women. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[30]  Ronald J. Burke,et al.  Gender in Organizations: Are Men Allies or Adversaries to Women's Career Advancement? , 2014 .

[31]  D. Lubinski,et al.  Life Paths and Accomplishments of Mathematically Precocious Males and Females Four Decades Later , 2014, Psychological science.

[32]  K. Coffman.  Evidence on Self-Stereotyping and the Contribution of Ideas , 2014 .

[33]  E. Diener,et al.  Resources, personal strivings, and subjective well-being: a nomothetic and idiographic approach. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  Barbara A. Greene,et al.  Gender and Orientations Toward the Future: Links to Motivation , 2004 .

[35]  M. Heilman,et al.  Has anything changed? Current characterizations of men, women, and managers. , 1989 .

[36]  Ernesto Reuben,et al.  How stereotypes impair women’s careers in science , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Robert C. Davis,et al.  The Achieving Society , 1962 .

[38]  S. Ceci,et al.  National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  M. Graham,et al.  Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.