Counter‐networks in standardization: a perspective of developing countries

Abstract.  Present information systems studies focus on technology from developed countries. Little is known about the development and implementation of indigenous technology in the developing world. This paper investigates China's experience of developing and deploying wireless local‐area network (WLAN) standards. First, drawing upon actor‐network theory, I interpret WLAN Authentication and Privacy Infrastructure (WAPI) standardization as a process of the actor‐network formation. Specifically, different actors were enrolled into two counter‐networks, namely the defensive network and the challenging network. These actors and the two counter‐networks struggled to dominate the interest inscriptions in the strategy of WLAN standardization. China's WAPI initiative failed because it could not establish a strong defensive network. Furthermore, I analyse the social, institutional and technological elements that determined the process of WAPI standardization. This case study demonstrates that counter‐network is a useful concept to analyse the mechanism of actor‐network formation. My analytical model in which the macro contexts are connected with the micro network dynamics can be drawn upon by other actor‐network studies on technology design and implementation. Practical implications for developing countries to develop the indigenous technologies have been given.

[1]  M. Callon Techno-economic Networks and Irreversibility , 1990 .

[2]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change , 1995 .

[3]  Xiaobai Shen Developing Country Perspectives on Software: Intellectual Property and Open Source - A Case Study of Microsoft and Linux in China , 2005, Int. J. IT Stand. Stand. Res..

[4]  Marc Berg,et al.  Guest editors' introduction: Actor-network theory and information systems. What's so special? , 2004, Inf. Technol. People.

[5]  Ping Gao,et al.  Using actor‐network theory to analyse strategy formulation , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[6]  P. David,et al.  Standards trade and competition in the emerging global information infrastructure environment. , 1996 .

[7]  C R Morris,et al.  How architecture wins technology wars. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[8]  G. Walsham Making a World of Difference: IT in a Global Context , 2001 .

[9]  Jørn Braa,et al.  Networks of Action: Sustainable Health Information Systems Across Developing Countries , 2004, MIS Q..

[10]  Samir Chatterjee,et al.  Wireless Communications: Myths and Reality , 2004, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Xiaobai Shen Developing Country Perspectives Software: Intellectual Property and Open Source , 2005 .

[12]  Eric Monteiro,et al.  Inscribing behaviour in information infrastructure standards , 1997 .

[13]  G. Walsham Actor-network theory and IS research: current status and future prospects , 1997 .

[14]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation , 1985 .

[15]  Jen Lin-Liu Top U.S. officials successfully defend IEEE's Wi-Fi standard , 2004 .

[16]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[17]  Rob Kling,et al.  Social Analyses of Computing: Theoretical Perspectives in Recent Empirical Research , 1980, CSUR.

[18]  H. Klein,et al.  The Social Construction of Technology: Structural Considerations , 2002 .

[19]  Greg Linden,et al.  China Standard Time: A Study in Strategic Industrial Policy , 2004, Business and Politics.

[20]  Jonathan P. Allen Redefining the network: enrollment strategies in the PDA industry , 2004, Inf. Technol. People.

[21]  Jeremy Rose,et al.  Democracy Squared: Designing On-Line Political Communities to Accommodate Conflicting Interests , 2005, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[22]  Lucy Gooding,et al.  Making a world of difference. , 2009, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[23]  L. Winner Upon Opening the Black Box and Finding It Empty: Social Constructivism and the Philosophy of Technology , 1993 .

[24]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  A Framework to Build Process Theories of Anticipatory Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Standardizing , 2008, Int. J. IT Stand. Stand. Res..

[25]  John Law,et al.  Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity , 1992 .

[26]  P SuttmeierRichard A new technonationalism , 2005 .

[27]  Xiaobai Shen,et al.  Developing Country Perspectives on Software: Intellectual Property and Open Source. A Case Study of Microsoft and Linux in China , 2005 .

[28]  Borges Gouveia,et al.  Organization, Programme and Structure: An Analysis of the Chinese Innovation Policy Framework , 2004 .

[29]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Achieving high momentum in the evolution of wireless infrastructures: the battle over the 1G solutions , 2002 .

[30]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  Information Technology and Changes in Organizational Work , 1996, IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology.

[31]  Amany R. Elbanna Actor Network Theory and IS Research , 2009 .

[32]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[33]  Ulrike Schultze,et al.  From Work to Activity: Technology and the Narrative of Progress , 1996 .

[34]  Stephanie Watts,et al.  Contested artifact: technology sensemaking, actor networks, and the shaping of the Web browser , 2004, Inf. Technol. People.

[35]  D. Sommers,et al.  A longitudinal analysis , 1992 .

[36]  Jeremy Rose,et al.  Socio-Theoretic Accounts of IS: The Problem of Agency , 2005, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[37]  B. Latour On Recalling Ant , 1999 .

[38]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Research Commentary: The Next Wave of Nomadic Computing , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[39]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  The Next Wave of Nomadic Computing: A Research Agenda for Information Systems Research , 2008 .

[40]  Jian Ning,et al.  Constraints on E-commerce in Less Developed Countries: The Case of China , 2002, Electron. Commer. Res..

[41]  Henning Olesen,et al.  Mobile communications: Europe, Japan and South Korea in a comparative perspective , 2004 .

[42]  Raluca Bunduchi,et al.  Social Shaping & Standardization: A Case Study from Auto Industry , 2005, HICSS.

[43]  A. Langley Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[44]  K. Lyytinen,et al.  Around the cradle of the wireless revolution: the emergence and evolution of cellular telephony , 2002 .

[45]  Rudi Bekkers,et al.  Intellectual Property Rights, Strategic Technology Agreements and Market Structure, The Case of GSM , 2002 .

[46]  K. Lyytinen,et al.  Standard making: a critical research frontier for information systems research , 2006 .

[47]  Richard P. Suttmeier A new technonationalism?: China and the development of technical standards , 2005, CACM.

[48]  R. Williams,et al.  Social Shaping & Standardization: A Case Study from Auto Industry , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[49]  Jan Weglarz,et al.  Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations , 1993 .

[50]  Cong Cao,et al.  Challenges for Technological Development in China’s Industry. Foreign investors are the main providers of technology , 2004 .

[51]  J. Overhage,et al.  Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[52]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  GIS for District-Level Administration in India: Problems and Opportunities , 1999, MIS Q..