Pedicle Morphometry of Upper Thoracic Vertebrae: An Anatomic Study of 503 Cadaveric Specimens

Study Design. An anatomic study of pedicle dimensions was performed for upper thoracic vertebrae from American human subjects. Objective. To quantify the dimensions of the upper thoracic pedicles and to better define the demographic factors that could ultimately govern the caliber selection of pedicle screws. Summary of Background Data. Transpedicular screw fixation allows for segmental instrumentation into multiple vertebrae across multilevel fusion area, offering considerable biomechanical advantage over the conventional hook and lateral mass fixation. Large variations in morphology from previous studies may be related to differences in demographics, sample size, and methodology. Methods. For this study, T1–T6 vertebrae from 503 American human cadavers were directly measured with a digital caliper. Examiner measured each vertebra to determine medial-lateral pedicle width and cranial-caudal pedicle height. Demographic information regarding age, sex, and race, as well as body height and weight, was available for all 503 subjects. Results. Pedicle height generally increased in size caudally down the upper thoracic spine, but the highest pedicle height was at the T3 level with a mean of 12.25 mm. Pedicle width displayed a narrowing pattern moving down. The widest pedicle width was at the T1 level with a mean of 8.66 mm. The 2 older age groups had larger pedicles than the 2 younger age groups. Males have larger pedicles than females for all upper thoracic levels. The tallest and heaviest groups had larger pedicles than the shorter and lighter groups, respectively. Race was not a significant factor in affecting pedicle dimension. Conclusion. Our large-scale study of American specimens characterized the relationship between pedicle dimensions and a variety of demographic factors such as age, sex, body height, and weight. With substantial statistical power, this study showed that male, older, taller, and heavier individuals had larger pedicles. Level of Evidence: N/A

[1]  Lisa Ferrara,et al.  Pedicle Morphometry in the Upper Thoracic Spine: Limits to Safe Screw Placement in Older Patients , 2002, Spine.

[2]  U Liljenqvist,et al.  Pullout strength of pedicle screws versus pedicle and laminar hooks in the thoracic spine. , 2001, Acta orthopaedica Belgica.

[3]  H. Lee,et al.  Morphometric Study of the Pedicles of Thoracic and Lumbar Vertebrae in Koreans , 1994, Spine.

[4]  Samuel K. Cho,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Pedicle Screw Versus Hybrid Instrumentation in Posterior Spinal Fusion of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis , 2004, Spine.

[5]  D. Silcox,et al.  Cervical Pedicle Screws Versus Lateral Mass Screws: Anatomic Feasibility and Biomechanical Comparison , 1997, Spine.

[6]  A G Patwardhan,et al.  Analysis of the Morphometric Characteristics of the Thoracic and Lumbar Pedicles , 1987, Spine.

[7]  J W Frymoyer,et al.  An internal fixator for posterior application to short segments of the thoracic, lumbar, or lumbosacral spine. Design and testing. , 1986, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  S. Hou,et al.  Pedicle morphology of the lower thoracic and lumbar spine in a Chinese population. , 1993, Spine.

[9]  L. Lenke,et al.  Comparison of Thoracic Pedicle Screw to Hook Instrumentation for the Treatment of Adult Spinal Deformity , 2007, Spine.

[10]  T. Washio,et al.  Structural Characteristics of the Pedicle and Its Role in Screw Stability , 1997, Spine.

[11]  R. Rizzoli,et al.  Critical years and stages of puberty for spinal and femoral bone mass accumulation during adolescence. , 1991, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[12]  Katherine M Flegal,et al.  Prevalence of obesity and trends in the distribution of body mass index among US adults, 1999-2010. , 2012, JAMA.

[13]  J. Moran,et al.  A Morphometric Study of Human Lumbar and Selected Thoracic Vertebrae , 1987, Spine.

[14]  W. Hutton,et al.  Pedicle and transverse process screws of the upper thoracic spine. Biomechanical comparison of loads to failure. , 1999, Spine.

[15]  J. Palmgren,et al.  Exercise, smoking, and calcium intake during adolescence and early adulthood as determinants of peak bone mass , 1994, BMJ.

[16]  J. Farmer,et al.  An Analysis of Neuroforaminal Pressures with Varying Head and Arm Positions , 1994, Spine.

[17]  Shijian Cai,et al.  Thoracic Pedicle Morphometry in Different Body Height Population: A Three-Dimensional Study Using Reformatted Computed Tomography , 2011, Spine.

[18]  E. Benzel,et al.  Anatomy of the thoracic pedicle. , 1995, Neurosurgery.

[19]  S. Jandrić,et al.  [Idiopathic scoliosis]. , 2012, Medicinski pregled.

[20]  B Latimer,et al.  Vertebral Body and Posterior Element Morphology: The Normal Spine in Middle Life , 1988, Spine.

[21]  A. Dhawan,et al.  In Vivo Accuracy of Thoracic Pedicle Screws , 2001, Spine.

[22]  P. Nicholson,et al.  Vertebral deformity, bone mineral density, back pain and height loss in unscreened women over 50 years , 1993, Osteoporosis International.

[23]  S. Mitra,et al.  Morphometric Study of the Thoracic Vertebral Pedicle in an Indian Population , 2004, Spine.

[24]  Tait S. Smith,et al.  Short-segment Pedicle Instrumentation: Biomechanical Analysis of Supplemental Hook Fixation , 1996, Spine.

[25]  E. Teo,et al.  Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy of cervical, thoracic and lumbar vertebrae of Chinese Singaporeans , 2004, European Spine Journal.

[26]  M. Millgram,et al.  Accuracy and Safety of Thoracic Pedicle Screw Placement in Spinal Deformities , 2005, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[27]  J. Pournaras,et al.  Pedicle dimensions of the thoracic and lumbar vertebrae in the Greek population , 2005, Clinical anatomy.

[28]  M. Yusof,et al.  Computed Tomographic Morphometry of Thoracic Pedicles: Safety Margin of Transpedicular Screw Fixation in Malaysian Malay Population , 2006, Spine.

[29]  S. Gumina,et al.  Pedicle instrumentation in the thoracic spine. A morphometric and cadaveric study for placement of screws. , 1999, Spine.

[30]  P. Chaynes,et al.  Vertebral pedicle anatomy in relation to pedicle screw fixation: a cadaver study , 2001, Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy.

[31]  A. Alho,et al.  Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion: A prospective CT study in 30 low back patients , 2005, European Spine Journal.

[32]  Y. Anık,et al.  Pedicle morphology of the thoracic spine in preadolescent idiopathic scoliosis: magnetic resonance supported analysis , 2007, European Spine Journal.

[33]  R R Recker,et al.  Bone gain in young adult women. , 1992, JAMA.

[34]  L. Lenke,et al.  Free Hand Pedicle Screw Placement in the Thoracic Spine: Is it Safe? , 2004, Spine.

[35]  R. Gaines.  The Use of Pedicle-Screw Internal Fixation for the Operative Treatment of Spinal Disorders* , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[36]  H. Halm,et al.  Pedicle Screw Instrumentation of the Thoracic Spine in Idiopathic Scoliosis , 1997, Spine.

[37]  R. Yeasting,et al.  Projection of the thoracic pedicle and its morphometric analysis. , 1997, Spine.

[38]  M. M. Panjabi,et al.  Complexity of the thoracic spine pedicle anatomy , 2005, European Spine Journal.

[39]  E. Orwoll,et al.  Vertebral deformity in men , 1992, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[40]  G. Saillant,et al.  [Vertebral osteosynthesis using metal plates. Its different uses (author's transl)]. , 1979, Chirurgie; memoires de l'Academie de chirurgie.