Research on Scaling Up Evidence-Based Instructional Practice: Developing a Sensitive Measure of the Rate of Implementation

Few evidence-based instructional practices achieve large-scale use, often remaining only in the schools directly involved in their development. Research on scaling up effective educational practice often lacks sensitive measures of the practice's implementation and the required research protocol. This article describes how we used rate of implementation as a sensitive measure to help identify barriers to implementation of class-wide peer tutoring (CWPT). Using communication technologies and a learning management system, we monitored the rate of CWPT implementation and its research protocol across nine schools in five states. Rate of implementation was defined as the number of weeks in which a school successfully completed the 12 implementation tasks required to reach full implementation. We discuss factors related to the variation in implementation rate (30-50 weeks) between schools, and implications of this measurement strategy for research on instructional practices and the technology used to facilitate scalability research.

[1]  L. Fuchs,et al.  Researchers and teachers working together to adapt instruction for diverse learners. , 1998 .

[2]  Vivian H. Wright,et al.  Distance Technologies in Collaborative Research: Analyzing the Successes and Barriers , 2003 .

[3]  Jay Buzhardt,et al.  Using Technology-Based Teacher Support Tools to Scale up the ClassWide Peer Tutoring Program , 2006 .

[4]  Charles R. Greenwood,et al.  ClassWide Peer Tutoring Learning Management System , 2001 .

[5]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Current progress and future directions for research in instructional technology , 1989 .

[6]  C. Greenwood,et al.  The Research to Practice Gap in Special Education , 2001 .

[7]  Charles R. Greenwood,et al.  Classwide Peer Tutoring , 1986 .

[8]  D. Carnine.  Bridging the Research-to-Practice Gap , 1997 .

[9]  W. Shadish,et al.  Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference , 2001 .

[10]  Charles B. Hodges.  Designing to Motivate: Motivational Techniques to Incorporate in E-Learning Experiences , 2004 .

[11]  L. Schorr.  Common Purpose: Strengthening Families and Neighborhoods to Rebuild America , 1997 .

[12]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[13]  R. Elmore.  Getting to Scale with Good Educational Practice , 1996 .

[14]  Margaret E. King‐Sears,et al.  Institutionalizing Peer-Mediated Instruction and Interventions in Schools , 2001 .

[15]  C. Greenwood,et al.  Longitudinal Analysis of Time, Engagement, and Achievement in At-Risk versus Non-Risk Students , 1991, Exceptional children.

[16]  Achievement, placement, and services: Middle school benefits of Classwide Peer Tutoring used at the elementary school. , 1993 .

[17]  David J. Pauleen,et al.  Facilitating virtual team relationships via Internet and conventional communication channels , 2001, Internet Res..

[18]  M. Fullan.  The New Meaning of Educational Change , 1990 .

[19]  R. Kozma.  Reflections on the state of educational technology research and development , 2000 .

[20]  Charles R. Greenwood,et al.  ClassWide Peer Tutoring and the Prevention of School Failure , 1995 .

[21]  Charles Greenwood,et al.  Classwide Peer Tutoring , 1986, Exceptional children.

[22]  Sheila Nataraj Kirby,et al.  Implementation and Performance in New American Schools: Three Years into Scale Up , 2001 .

[23]  L. Fuchs,et al.  Linking Assessment to Instructional Intervention: An Overview. , 1986 .

[24]  Janette K. Klingner,et al.  Barriers and Facilitators in Scaling up Research-Based Practices , 2003 .