Finding the best angle: pigeons (Columba livia) weight angular information more heavily than relative wall length in an open-field geometry task

Pigeons were trained to locate food in two geometrically equivalent corners of a parallelogram-shaped enclosure. Both the angular amplitude of the corners and the length of the walls alone were sufficient for successfully completing the task. Following training, birds were tested in three separate conditions that manipulated the geometric information available. During tests in both a rectangular-shaped enclosure that preserved the wall length information but not the angular amplitude, and a rhombus-shaped enclosure that did the opposite, pigeons located their goal corners with a high degree of accuracy, indicating an ability to use both types of geometric information in isolation. This result is consistent with prior research with domestic chicks. However, in a conflict test in a reverse parallelogram-shaped enclosure, in which the correct angular location was paired with an incorrect wall length location, birds showed a preference for the correct angular location. This suggests that pigeons weight angles more heavily than wall lengths in this type of navigation task, which differs from findings in a similar task conducted with the domestic chick. Results in the conflict test also suggest that pigeons did not use the principal axis as their main strategy of small-scale navigation.

[1]  C Thinus-Blanc,et al.  Rhesus monkeys use geometric and nongeometric information during a reorientation task. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[2]  A. Della Chiesa,et al.  Multiple landmarks, the encoding of environmental geometry and the spatial logics of a dual brain , 2006, Animal Cognition.

[3]  N. Newcombe,et al.  Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? squaring theory and evidence , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Modularity as a fish (Xenotoca eiseni) views it: conjoining geometric and nongeometric information for spatial reorientation. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[5]  M L Spetch,et al.  Pigeons encode relative geometry. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[6]  S. Healy Spatial representation in animals. , 1998 .

[7]  T. Gurley,et al.  Orientation in trapezoid-shaped enclosures: implications for theoretical accounts of geometry learning. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[8]  Debbie M. Kelly,et al.  Geometry and landmark representation by pigeons: evidence for species‐differences in the hemispheric organization of spatial information processing? , 2009, The European journal of neuroscience.

[9]  M. Spetch,et al.  Searching in the center: pigeons (Columba livid) encode relative distance from walls of an enclosure. , 2004, Journal of comparative psychology.

[10]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Modularity and spatial reorientation in a simple mind: encoding of geometric and nongeometric properties of a spatial environment by fish , 2002, Cognition.

[11]  Marcia L. Spetch,et al.  Mechanisms of landmark use in mammals and birds. , 1998 .

[12]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Separate Geometric and Non-Geometric Modules for Spatial Reorientation: Evidence from a Lopsided Animal Brain , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  M Zanforlin,et al.  Geometric modules in animals' spatial representations: a test with chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus). , 1990, Journal of comparative psychology.

[14]  A. Della Chiesa,et al.  Spatial cognition based on geometry and landmarks in the domestic chick (Gallus gallus) , 2006, Behavioural Brain Research.

[15]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Re-orienting in space: do animals use global or local geometry strategies? , 2010, Biology Letters.

[16]  Brett M Gibson,et al.  Rats (Rattus norvegicus) encode the shape of an array of discrete objects. , 2007, Journal of comparative psychology.

[17]  Antoine Wystrach,et al.  Ants Learn Geometry and Features , 2009, Current Biology.

[18]  K. Cheng A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation , 1986, Cognition.

[19]  C R Gallistel,et al.  Shape parameters explain data from spatial transformations: comment on Pearce et al. (2004) and Tommasi & Polli (2004). , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[20]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  A geometric process for spatial reorientation in young children , 1994, Nature.

[21]  Debbie M. Kelly,et al.  Comparative Spatial CognitionEncoding of Geometric Information from Surfaces and Landmark Arrays , 2012 .

[22]  Kenneth P. Able,et al.  Common Themes and Variations in Animal Orientation Systems , 1991 .

[23]  Peter M. Jones,et al.  Transfer of spatial behavior between different environments: implications for theories of spatial learning and for the role of the hippocampus in spatial learning. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[24]  M. Spetch,et al.  Pigeons encode absolute distance but relational direction from landmarks and walls. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[25]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  How fish do geometry in large and in small spaces , 2006, Animal Cognition.

[26]  Luca Tommasi,et al.  Representation of two geometric features of the environment in the domestic chick (Gallus gallus) , 2004, Animal Cognition.

[27]  Almut Hupbach,et al.  Reorientation in a rhombic environment: No evidence for an encapsulated geometric module , 2005 .

[28]  Alinda Friedman,et al.  Penetrating the geometric module: catalyzing children's use of landmarks. , 2007, Developmental psychology.

[29]  Ken Cheng,et al.  Small-scale spatial cognition in pigeons , 2006, Behavioural Processes.

[30]  Juan Pedro Vargas,et al.  Encoding of geometric and featural spatial information by goldfish (Carassius auratus). , 2004, Journal of comparative psychology.

[31]  Debbie M. Kelly,et al.  Pigeons' (Columba livia) encoding of geometric and featural properties of a spatial environment. , 1998 .

[32]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Searching for the center: spatial cognition in the domestic chick (Gallus gallus). , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[33]  Peter L. Hurd,et al.  Growing in Circles , 2007 .

[34]  Debbie M. Kelly,et al.  Use of local and global geometry from object arrays by adult humans , 2011, Behavioural Processes.

[35]  E S Spelke,et al.  Mechanisms of reorientation and object localization by children: a comparison with rats. , 1999, Behavioral neuroscience.