Criterion-referenced measurement for educational evaluation and selection

In recent years, Sweden has adopted a criterion-referenced grading system, where the grade outcome is used for several purposes, but foremost for educational evaluation on student- and school level ...

[1]  W. Popham.  Criterion-referenced instruction , 1973 .

[2]  Ronald K. Hambleton,et al.  Criterion-Referenced Testing and Measurement: A Review of Technical Issues and Developments , 1978 .

[3]  S. Messick.  Test Validity: A Matter of Consequence , 1998 .

[4]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives , 2000 .

[5]  Peter Nyström.  Rätt mätt på prov : Om validering av bedömningar i skolan , 2004 .

[6]  Christina Stage,et al.  The Swedish scholastic assessment test (SweSAT) : Development, results and experiences , 2004 .

[7]  T. R. Husek,et al.  IMPLICATIONS OF CRITERION‐REFERENCED MEASUREMENT1,2 , 1969 .

[8]  Robert Glaser,et al.  Instructional technology and the measurement of learing outcomes: Some questions. , 1963 .

[9]  James F. Watkins,et al.  Criterion-Referenced Testing. , 1982 .

[10]  Kent Löfgren.  Validation of the Swedish university entrance system : selected results from the VALUTA-project 2001-2004 , 2005 .

[11]  Bertil Roos,et al.  ICT and formative assessment in the learning society , 2005 .

[12]  W. T. McLeod.  The new Collins dictionary and thesaurus in one volume , 1987 .

[13]  S. Lane.  Validity of High‐Stakes Assessment: Are Students Engaged in Complex Thinking? , 2005 .

[14]  John P. Campbell,et al.  Measurement Theory for the Behavioral Sciences. , 1983 .

[15]  Widar Henriksson,et al.  Academic Performance in Four Study Programmes: a comparison of students admitted on the basis of GPA and SweSAT scores, with and without credits for work experience , 1998 .

[16]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. , 1957 .

[17]  G. Arnman,et al.  Valfrihet - fiktion och verklighet , 2004 .

[18]  Simon Wolming,et al.  Validity issues in higher education selection: a Swedish example , 1999 .

[19]  Samuel Messick,et al.  STANDARDS OF VALIDITY AND THE VALIDITY OF STANDARDS IN PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT , 2005 .

[20]  Wendy M. Yen,et al.  Scaling Performance Assessments: Strategies for Managing Local Item Dependence , 1993 .

[21]  R. Linn.  Criterion‐Referenced Measmment: A Valwable Perspective Clouded by Surplus Meaning , 2005 .

[22]  A. Nitko.  Educational Assessment of Students , 1996 .

[23]  Jay Parkes.  Relationship Between Reliability and Cost of Performance Assessment , 2000 .

[24]  Amy Brualdi,et al.  Traditional and Modern Concepts of Validity. ERIC/AE Digest. , 1999 .

[25]  H. D. Black,et al.  Criterion-referenced assessment in the classroom , 1984 .

[26]  James H. McMillan,et al.  Classroom Assessment: Principles and Practice for Effective Instruction , 1996 .

[27]  L. Mueller-Joseph,et al.  Classroom Assessment , 1998 .

[28]  Simon Wolming.  Att värdera urvalsinstrument: Några reflektioner över begränsningar och möjligheter , 2001 .

[29]  Jay Parkes,et al.  The Relationship between the Reliability and Cost of Performance Assessments , 2000 .

[30]  CLASSICAL TEST THEORY vs. ITEM RESPONSE THEORY An evaluation of the theory test in the Swedish driving-license test , 2004 .

[31]  Christina Cliffordson.  De målrelaterade gymnasiebetygens prognosförmåga , 2004 .

[32]  L. Shepard.  Chapter 9: Evaluating Test Validity , 1993 .

[33]  R. Shavelson,et al.  Sampling Variability of Performance Assessments. , 1993 .

[34]  R. Linn.  Educational measurement, 3rd ed. , 1989 .

[35]  Kenny Bränberg,et al.  The Effects of Practice on the Swedish Scholastic Aptitude Test (SweSAT) , 1994 .

[36]  Susy Macqueen,et al.  Validity , 1973, Just Algorithms.

[37]  S. Sireci.  The Construct of Content Validity , 1998 .

[38]  R. Gregory.  Psychological Testing: History, Principles, and Applications , 1992 .

[39]  Anthony J. Nitko.  Educational Assessment of Students. Second Edition. , 1996 .

[40]  Widar Henriksson,et al.  Repeated Test Taking : Differences Between Social Groups , 2004 .

[41]  R. Hambleton.  The Rise and Fall of Criterion Referenced Measurement , 2005 .

[42]  William A. Mehrens,et al.  The Consequences of Consequential Validity. , 2005 .

[43]  W. Popham.  Consequential validity: Right Concern‐Wrong Concept , 2005 .

[44]  Ingemar Wedman.  Kriterierelaterade prov : bakgrund, egenskaper och begränsningar , 1973 .