“A Voice to Talk About it”: Cosmetologists as STEM Experts in Educational Technology Design and Implementation

Abstract In the U.S. there are steady efforts by governmental and philanthropic organizations to increase the representation of students of colour in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). After years of mixed results, researchers and educators have started to question one size fits all notions of broadening participation. An increasing number of projects are challenging universalist assumptions by enrolling the expertise of culturally situated communities of practice in STEM lessons and the educational technologies that support them. While this research shows promising results for improving young people’s interest and performance in STEM, there has been little research on how these lessons and technologies might also benefit the communities whose expertise were originally enrolled. This paper details the design of educational technologies that bridge STEM and African American cosmetology. We report on a mixed-methods research project, conducted with a group of predominantly African American cosmetologists. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected to study their attitudes toward STEM before and after working with the technologies. Our results suggest positive changes in the cosmetologists’ attitudes. We end with a critical discussion about respecting the knowledge systems of underrepresented communities of practice in educational technology research and development.

[1]  Ingrid Banks Hair Matters: Beauty, Power, and Black Women's Consciousness , 2000 .

[2]  Lindsey E. Malcom-Piqueux,et al.  Critical Mass Revisited , 2013 .

[3]  Ron Eglash,et al.  African Fractals: Modern Computing and Indigenous Design , 1999 .

[4]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[5]  Alice L. Pawley,et al.  The Power and Politics of STEM Research Design: Saving the "Small N" , 2015 .

[6]  Marion Usselman,et al.  Promoting Diversity and Public School Success in FIRST LEGO League State Competitions , 2011 .

[7]  Mitchel Resnick,et al.  Lifelong Kindergarten: Cultivating Creativity through Projects, Passion, Peers, and Play , 2017 .

[8]  Larry Cuban Oversold and Underused , 2001 .

[9]  L. Patel Countering Coloniality in Educational Research: From Ownership to Answerability , 2014 .

[10]  Gordon Divine Asaah,et al.  Culturally Sustaining Pedagogies: Teaching and Learning for Justice in a Changing World , 2018, Journal of Family Diversity in Education.

[11]  Michael Lachney,et al.  Culturally responsive computing as brokerage: toward asset building with education-based social movements , 2017 .

[12]  A. Bennett Ethnocomputational creativity in STEAM education: a cultural framework for generative justice , 2016 .

[13]  Cynthia Solomon Computer Environments for Children: A Reflection on Theories of Learning and Education , 1986 .

[14]  James Davis,et al.  Culturally Situated Design Tools: Generative Justice as a Foundation for STEM Diversity , 2017 .

[15]  The (mis)use of community of practice: delusion, confusion and instrumentalism in educational technology research , 2015 .

[16]  Johnny Saldaña,et al.  The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers , 2009 .

[17]  R. Eglash,et al.  Adinkra Mathematics: A study of Ethnocomputing in Ghana , 2015 .

[18]  E. Tarlo Entanglement: The Secret Lives of Hair , 2016 .

[19]  Audrey Bennett,et al.  Culturally Situated Design Tools: Ethnocomputing from Field Site to Classroom , 2006 .

[20]  Brandy L. Simula Book Review: The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers, 3rd ed. , 2018 .

[21]  Seymour Papert,et al.  Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas , 1981 .

[22]  Kimberly M. Sheridan,et al.  Culturally responsive computing: a theory revisited , 2015 .

[23]  Marisa Barnhart,et al.  Mohawk Interruptus: Political Life across the Borders of Settler States , 2015 .

[24]  R. Eglash,et al.  Design Agency: Diversifying Computer Science at the Intersections of Creativity and Culture , 2016 .