EMGLAB: An interactive EMG decomposition program

This paper describes an interactive computer program for decomposing EMG signals into their component motor-unit potential (MUP) trains and for averaging MUP waveforms. The program is able to handle single- or multi-channel signals recorded by needle or fine-wire electrodes during low and moderate levels of muscular contraction. It includes advanced algorithms for template matching, resolving superimpositions, and waveform averaging, as well as a convenient user interface for manually editing and verifying the results. The program also provides the ability to inspect the discharges of individual motor units more closely by subtracting out interfering activity from other MUP trains. Decomposition accuracy was assessed by cross-checking pairs of signals recorded by nearby electrodes during the same contraction. The results show that 100% accuracy can be achieved for MUPs with peak-to-peak amplitudes greater than 2.5 times the rms signal amplitude. Examples are presented to show how decomposition can be used to investigate motor-unit recruitment and discharge behavior, to study motor-unit architecture, and to detect action potential blocking in doubly innervated muscle fibers.

[1]  J. Desmedt.  Motor control mechanisms in health and disease , 1983 .

[2]  H. Devries.  MUSCLES ALIVE-THEIR FUNCTIONS REVEALED BY ELECTROMYOGRAPHY , 1976 .

[3]  Ronald S. Lefever,et al.  A Procedure for Decomposing the Myoelectric Signal Into Its Constituent Action Potentials - Part I: Technique, Theory, and Implementation , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  D. Stashuk,et al.  Robust method for estimating motor unit firing-pattern statistics , 2007, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[5]  C.J. De Luca,et al.  Next-generation decomposition of multi-channel EMG signals , 2002, Proceedings of the Second Joint 24th Annual Conference and the Annual Fall Meeting of the Biomedical Engineering Society] [Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[6]  Kevin C McGill,et al.  Increased jitter and blocking in normal muscles due to doubly innervated muscle fibers , 2003, Muscle & nerve.

[7]  K.C. McGill,et al.  Validation of a computer-aided EMG decomposition method , 2004, The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[8]  Kevin C. McGill,et al.  Optimal resolution of superimposed action potentials , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  Steen Andreassen,et al.  Computer-Aided Electromyography and Expert Systems , 1989 .

[10]  E. Kaplan.  Muscles Alive. Their Functions Revealed by Electromyography. J. V. Basmajian. Baltimore, The Williams and Wilkins Co., 1962. $8.50 , 1962 .

[11]  J. Desmedt.  Size principle of motoneuron recruitment and the calibration of muscle force and speed in man. , 1983, Advances in neurology.

[12]  D. Stashuk,et al.  Resolving superimposed motor unit action potentials , 2007, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[13]  Kevin C McGill,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence of adult human skeletal muscle fibres with multiple endplates and polyneuronal innervation , 2002, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  H.-A. Loeliger,et al.  Decomposition of electromyographic signals by iterative message passing in a graphical model , 2004, The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[15]  George S. Moschytz,et al.  A software package for the decomposition of long-term multichannel EMG signals using wavelet coefficients , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  D F Stegeman,et al.  Near- and far-fields: source characteristics and the conducting medium in neurophysiology. , 1997, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[17]  Kevin C. McGill,et al.  High-Resolution Alignment of Sampled Waveforms , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  J. Stephens,et al.  Synchronization of motor unit activity during voluntary contraction in man. , 1990, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  S. Andreassen,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Individual Motor Unit Potentials: A Proposition for Standardized Terminology and Criteria for Measurement , 1986, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[20]  Zeynep Erim,et al.  Common drive of motor units in regulation of muscle force , 1994, Trends in Neurosciences.

[21]  Desmedt Je.  Size principle of motoneuron recruitment and the calibration of muscle force and speed in man. , 1983 .

[22]  D F Stegeman,et al.  Magnetic stimulation‐induced modulations of motor unit firings extracted from multi‐channel surface EMG , 2000, Muscle & nerve.

[23]  R Merletti,et al.  Evaluation of intra-muscular EMG signal decomposition algorithms. , 2001, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[24]  Rui J. P. de Figueiredo,et al.  Separation of superimposed signals by a cross-correlation method , 1982, ICASSP.

[25]  S Andreassen,et al.  Regulation of the firing pattern of single motor units. , 1980, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[26]  B Mambrito,et al.  A technique for the detection, decomposition and analysis of the EMG signal. , 1984, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[27]  O. Lippold,et al.  Motor unit activity in the voluntary contraction of human muscle , 1954, The Journal of physiology.

[28]  Kevin C. McGill,et al.  Automatic Decomposition of the Clinical Electromyogram , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[29]  A R Spitzer,et al.  Assessment of variability in the shape of the motor unit action potential, "the jiggle," at consecutive discharges. , 1995, Muscle & nerve.

[30]  Kevin C. McGill,et al.  Satellite potentials of motor unit action potentials in normal muscles: a new hypothesis for their origin , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[31]  George S. Moschytz,et al.  High-precision EMG signal decomposition using communication techniques , 2000, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[32]  Kevin C McGill,et al.  Estimating motor-unit architectural properties by analyzing motor-unit action potential morphology , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[33]  A J Fuglevand,et al.  Estimating the strength of common input to human motoneurons from the cross‐correlogram. , 1992, The Journal of physiology.

[34]  Alexander Adam,et al.  Recruitment order of motor units in human vastus lateralis muscle is maintained during fatiguing contractions. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  D Stashuk,et al.  EMG signal decomposition: how can it be accomplished and used? , 2001, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.