Comparison of low- and high-side two-tone suppression in inner hair cell and organ of corti responses

Two-tone interactions were measured from inner hair cells and from the organ of Corti fluid space in the third turn of the guinea pig cochlea. At relatively low stimulus levels, a low-side suppressor caused frequency response functions to become broader. Phase changes exhibited a lag/lead transition around the characteristic frequency in harmony with the change in magnitude. These patterns are similar to those previously documented for a high-side suppressor (Cheatham and Dallos 1989) and suggest that suppression is not simply an attenuation phenomenon since level reductions for single-tone inputs produce response patterns which are mirror images of those obtained for the two-tone conditions. In contrast to the low-level results, data measured at moderately high stimulus levels indicate that the magnitude changes produced by both low- and high-side suppressors are qualitatively similar to changes generated by reducing the input sound level. In other words, ac frequency response functions become narrower, partially reversing the broadening of these functions which occurs as sound level increases. Companion phase measures, however, demonstrate that low- and high-side suppressors, in spite of producing similar changes in filter shape, do not produce similar changes in response phase. In fact, neither of the two-tone conditions produce response patterns similar to the one associated with reducing the input sound level.

[1]  Physiological mechanisms of masking and intensity discrimination , 1989 .

[2]  M. Cheatham,et al.  Two-tone interactions in inner hair cell receptor potentials: AC versus DV effects , 1990, Hearing Research.

[3]  Joseph Santos-Sacchi,et al.  AC receptor potentials from hair cells in the low-frequency region of the guinea pig cochlea , 1983 .

[4]  W. S. Rhode,et al.  Evidence from Mössbauer experiments for nonlinear vibration in the cochlea. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  L. Robles,et al.  Nonlinear Interactions in the Mechanical Response of the Cochlea to Two-Tone Stimuli , 1989 .

[6]  Peter Dallos,et al.  Two-tone suppression and intermodulation distortion in the cochlea: Effect of outer hair cell lesions , 1980 .

[7]  John H. Mills,et al.  Tuning and suppression in auditory nerve fibers of aged gerbils raised in quiet or noise , 1990, Hearing Research.

[8]  Paul J. Abbas,et al.  Phenomenological model for two‐tone suppression , 1976 .

[9]  H. W. Bode,et al.  Network analysis and feedback amplifier design , 1945 .

[10]  A. Flock Mechanical properties of hair cells , 1986, Hearing Research.

[11]  B. M. Johnstone,et al.  Measurement of basilar membrane motion in the guinea pig using the Mössbauer technique. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  E. Javel,et al.  Suppression of auditory nerve responses I: temporal analysis, intensity effects and suppression contours. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  C. Daniel Geisler,et al.  Saturation of outer hair cell receptor currents causes two-tone suppression , 1990, Hearing Research.

[14]  M. Cheatham,et al.  Cochlear mechanics, nonlinearities, and cochlear potentials. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  S. R. Shaw,et al.  Anti-adhesive coating for glass microelectrodes , 1986, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[16]  E. F. Evans,et al.  Pitch and Cochlear Nerve Fibre Temporal Discharge Patterns , 1938 .

[17]  Peter Dallos,et al.  Neurobiology of cochlear inner and outer hair cells: intracellular recordings , 1986, Hearing Research.

[18]  Stephen T. Neely,et al.  An active cochlear model showing sharp tuning and high sensitivity , 1983, Hearing Research.

[19]  C. D. Geisler,et al.  Frequency selectivity of single cochlear-nerve fibers based on the temporal response pattern to two-tone signals. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  C. D. Geisler,et al.  Two-tone suppression in auditory nerve of the cat: rate-intensity and temporal analyses. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  D. O. Kim A REVIEW OF NONLINEAR AND ACTIVE COCHLEAR MODELS , 1986 .

[22]  Mario A. Ruggero,et al.  Effects of excitatory and non-excitatory suppressor tones on two-tone rate suppression in auditory nerve fibers , 1987, Hearing Research.

[23]  D. O. Kim,et al.  Cochlear nerve fiber responses: distribution along the cochlear partition. , 1975, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  P Dallos,et al.  Production of cochlear potentials by inner and outer hair cells. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  P Dallos,et al.  Response characteristics of mammalian cochlear hair cells , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[26]  C D Geisler,et al.  The phases of basilar-membrane vibrations. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  J. L. Hall Cochlear models: Evidence in support of mechanical nonlinearity and a second filter (a review) , 1980, Hearing Research.

[28]  Frequency selectivity of the cochlea for formant peaks at high signal levels. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  J R Johnstone,et al.  Basilar membrane and middle-ear vibration in guinea pig measured by capacitive probe. , 1975, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  J. Allen Magnitude and phase-frequency response to single tones in the auditory nerve. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  S. Shamma,et al.  Synchrony suppression in complex stimulus responses of a biophysical model of the cochlea. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  A. Nuttall,et al.  The temperature dependency of neural and hair cell responses evoked by high frequencies. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  H. Davis,et al.  The Space‐Time Pattern of the Cochlear Microphonics (Guinea Pig), as Recorded by Differential Electrodes , 1952 .

[34]  I. J. Russell,et al.  Two-tone suppression in cochlear hair cells , 1979, Hearing Research.

[35]  Peter Dallos,et al.  COCHLEAR POTENTIALS AND COCHLEAR MECHANICS , 1973 .

[36]  C D Geisler,et al.  A two-stage nonlinear cochlear model possesses automatic gain control. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  B. Delgutte,et al.  Physiological mechanisms of psychophysical masking: observations from auditory-nerve fibers. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  C. Daniel Geisler,et al.  A model of the effect of outer hair cell motility on cochlear vibrations , 1986, Hearing Research.

[39]  M. Cheatham,et al.  Two-tone suppression in inner hair cell responses , 1989, Hearing Research.

[40]  David J. Anderson,et al.  Temporal Position of Discharges in Single Auditory Nerve Fibers within the Cycle of a Sine‐Wave Stimulus: Frequency and Intensity Effects , 1971 .

[41]  L. Robles,et al.  Basilar membrane mechanics at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. I. Input-output functions, tuning curves, and response phases. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[42]  M. Sachs,et al.  Effects of nonlinearities on speech encoding in the auditory nerve. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[43]  Stephen T. Neely The Cochlear Amplifier , 1983 .

[44]  W. S. Rhode Observations of the vibration of the basilar membrane in squirrel monkeys using the Mössbauer technique. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.