Comparison of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Performed using Harmonic Scalpel as the Sole Instrument or by using Standard Clip and Electrocautery Technique

Introduction: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy using clips and cautery, has been the gold standard treatment for symptomatic cholelithiasis since long. But the technique still has areas requiring refinement, including complications of clips being dislodged and electrical arcing injuries, due to the use of monopolar electrocautery. This study was undertaken to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of the Harmonic scalpel as the sole instrument to achieve complete hemobiliary stasis. Material and methods: A comparative study was conducted at GMC Rajindra Hospital Patiala including sixty patients divided into two equal groups of 30 each, which underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy using standard clip and cautery technique or the Harmonic scalpel (HS) technique. Harmonic scalpel was used to ligate and cut both the cystic duct and artery. Comparison was made with regard to the operative time, lens cleaning, intraoperative and postoperative complications. Results: The use of Harmonic scalpel results in shorter operative time and reduces the number of times lens requires cleaning, but there is no significant difference in intraoperative and postoperative complications in both group of patients. Conclusion: Harmonic scalpel is safe and effective in providing complete hemobiliary stasis, it significantly reduces the operative duration and the number of times lens is cleaned, hence making the surgeon more comfortable.

[1]  M. Şahin,et al.  Closure of the Cystic Duct: Comparison to Harmonic Scalpel Versus Clip Application in Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy , 2014 .

[2]  A. Singhal,et al.  Control of Cystic Artery Using Monopolar Electrocautery in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy : Our Experience , 2014 .

[3]  Rajinder Singh,et al.  Monopolar electrocautery versus ultrasonic dissection of the gallbladder from the gallbladder bed in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. , 2012, Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie.

[4]  C. Franzoni,et al.  Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy With Harmonic Scalpel , 2010, JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons.

[5]  A. El Nakeeb,et al.  Comparative Study between Clipless Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy by Harmonic Scalpel Versus Conventional Method: A Prospective Randomized Study , 2010, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.

[6]  S. Adjepong Bile leakage resulting from clip displacement of the cystic duct stump , 2009, Surgical Endoscopy.

[7]  Wu Ji,et al.  Role of laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy in the treatment of complicated cholecystitis. , 2006, Hepatobiliary & pancreatic diseases international : HBPD INT.

[8]  G. Tebala Three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy by harmonic dissection without cystic duct and artery clipping. , 2006, American journal of surgery.

[9]  L. Israelsson,et al.  Randomized trial of traditional dissection with electrocautery versus ultrasonic fundus‐first dissection in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy , 2005, The British journal of surgery.

[10]  I. Petrakis,et al.  Bile leakage presenting as acute abdomen due to a stone created around a migrated surgical clip. , 2005, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.

[11]  A. Rohatgi,et al.  An audit of cystic duct closure in laparoscopic cholecystectomies , 2006, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[12]  J. Westervelt Clipless Cholecystectomy: Broadening the Role of the Harmonic Scalpel , 2004, JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons.

[13]  H. van Goor,et al.  Randomized clinical trial of ultrasonic versus electrocautery dissection of the gallbladder in laparoscopic cholecystectomy , 2003, The British journal of surgery.

[14]  L. Bencini,et al.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: retrospective comparative evaluation of titanium versus absorbable clips. , 2003, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[15]  G. Mathis,et al.  Embolism of a Metallic Clip: An Unusual Complication following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy , 2000, Digestive Surgery.

[16]  J. Calleary,et al.  Use of the ultrasonic dissecting scalpel in laparoscopic cholecystectomy , 2000, Surgical Endoscopy.

[17]  L. D. Reis Surgical clips incorporated into a duodenal ulcer: a rare complication after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. , 2000, Endoscopy.

[18]  C. Hüscher,et al.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy by harmonic dissection. , 1999, Surgical endoscopy.

[19]  S J Lee,et al.  Ultrasonic energy in endoscopic surgery. , 1999, Yonsei medical journal.

[20]  D. Margulies,et al.  Iatrogenic Gallbladder Perforation during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Etiology and Sequelae , 1999, The American surgeon.

[21]  M. Memon,et al.  The outcome of unretrieved gallstones in the peritoneal cavity during laparoscopic cholecystectomy , 1999, Surgical Endoscopy.

[22]  S D McCarus,et al.  Physiologic mechanism of the ultrasonically activated scalpel. , 1996, The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists.

[23]  J. Amaral The experimental development of an ultrasonically activated scalpel for laparoscopic use. , 1994, Surgical laparoscopy & endoscopy.

[24]  W. Walker,et al.  Cholangitis with a silver lining. , 1979, Archives of surgery.