The progress Portfolio: promoting reflective inquiry in complex investigation environments

Scientific inquiry in complex data-rich environments is a goal of much educational reform, but students require supports to manage the complexity of such investigations. We propose an approach to providing this support by making the processes and products of an investigation into explicit objects for reflection. We describe design research exploring ways to promote reflective inquiry among middle-school and high-school science students. We outline obstacles facing students in conducting investigations and give an overview of the design principles for our inquiry-support software environment, the Progress Portfolio. The specific tools provided by the Progress Portfolio for capturing, annotating, organizing, and presenting data are described in detail. We conclude with a discussion of pilot studies conducted with middle-school and high-school students.

[1]  Valerie J. Shute,et al.  Inference and discovery in an exploratory laboratory. , 1988 .

[2]  J. Shea National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[3]  L. Schauble,et al.  Belief revision in children: the role of prior knowledge and strategies for generating evidence. , 1990, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[4]  Christine Y. O'Sullivan NAEP 1996 Science Report Card for the Nation and the States. Findings from the National Assessment of Educational Progress. , 1997 .

[5]  Leona Schauble,et al.  Causal Models and Experimentation Strategies in Scientific Reasoning , 1991 .

[6]  Allan Collins,et al.  THE COMPUTER AS A TOOL FOR LEARNING THROUGH REFLECTION , 1986 .

[7]  J A Starkweather,et al.  The computer as a tool for learning. , 1986, The Western journal of medicine.

[8]  Valerie J. Shute,et al.  A Large-Scale Evaluation of an Intelligent Discovery World: Smithtown , 1990, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[9]  L. Schauble,et al.  Cross-Domain Development of Scientific Reasoning , 1992 .

[10]  Elizabeth A. Davis,et al.  Metacognitive Scaffolding To Foster Scientific Explanations. , 1996 .

[11]  David Klahr,et al.  Dual Space Search During Scientific Reasoning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[12]  J. Lagowski National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[13]  A. Schoenfeld Cognitive Science and Mathematics Education , 1987 .

[14]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  Computer-Supported Intentional Learning Environments , 1989 .

[15]  D. Kuhn Children and adults as intuitive scientists. , 1989, Psychological review.

[16]  S. Stein What's All the Fuss About? , 1996 .

[17]  Heinz Mandl,et al.  Learning Issues for Intelligent Tutoring Systems , 1988, Cognitive Science.