Three-dimensional confocal light microscopy of neurons: fluorescent and reflection stains.

Publisher Summary Confocal imaging is highly dependent on contrast enhancement methods to increase the visibility of the details of interest relative to their surroundings. This is particularly important for neurons embedded in thick tissue slices because they are surrounded by large numbers of other cells with identical optical properties. Thus staining and specimen preparation procedures are of critical importance, and it is essential to use selective stains that label only the portion of the specimen that is of interest. This specificity can be achieved by filling a selected space with stain, by exposing the specimen to stains that chemically bind to a particular component(s), or by conjugating the stain to a lectin or antibody that binds specifically to a particular component. There are two general categories of stains used for confocal imaging applied to neurobiology: fluorescent and reflection. When using the fluorescent, the illuminating light excites a molecular transition that decays by emitting light at a wavelength longer than the incident light, and the optical system allows only the longer wavelength to be detected. The latter reflects a portion of the incident light back into the objective lens to be subsequently detected to form the image.

[1]  F. Dudek,et al.  Dye-coupling between CA3 pyramidal cells in slices of rat hippocampus , 1980, Brain Research.

[2]  F. Dudek,et al.  Coupling in rat hippocampal slices: Dye transfer between CA1 pyramidal cells , 1982, Brain Research Bulletin.

[3]  Karen L. Smith,et al.  Parameters affecting imaging of the horseradish‐peroxidase‐diaminobenzidine reaction product in the confocal scanning laser microscope , 1990, Journal of microscopy.

[4]  W. W. Stewart,et al.  Functional connections between cells as revealed by dye-coupling with a highly fluorescent naphthalimide tracer , 1978, Cell.

[5]  D. Szarowski,et al.  Dynamic changes in neuronal volume resulting from osmotic and sodium transport manipulations. , 1992, Acta biologica Hungarica.

[6]  Karen L. Smith,et al.  Confocal microscopy and three-dimensional reconstruction of electrophysiologically identified neurons in thick brain slices. , 1991, Journal of electron microscopy technique.

[7]  J N Turner,et al.  Regulation of receptor‐mediated shape change in astroglial cells , 1992, Glia.

[8]  H. Berthoud,et al.  Simultaneous labeling of vagal innervation of the gut and afferent projections from the visceral forebrain with Dil injected into the dorsal vagal complex in the rat , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[9]  L. Haberly,et al.  Deep neurons in piriform cortex. I. Morphology and synaptically evoked responses including a unique high-amplitude paired shock facilitation. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  A Boyde Colour‐coded stereo images from the tandem scanning reflected light microscope (TSRLM) , 1987, Journal of microscopy.

[11]  D. Muller,et al.  A simple method for organotypic cultures of nervous tissue , 1991, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[12]  A Boyde,et al.  Study of Golgi‐impregnated material using the confocal tandem scanning reflected light microscope , 1990, Journal of microscopy.

[13]  Detection of diaminobenzidine reactions using scanning laser confocal reflectance microscopy. , 1989, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[14]  James N. Turner,et al.  Confocal scanning laser microscope images of hippocampal neurons intracellularly labeled with biocytin , 1990, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[15]  A. Fine,et al.  Confocal microscopy: applications in neurobiology , 1988, Trends in Neurosciences.

[16]  M. Fordham,et al.  An evaluation of confocal versus conventional imaging of biological structures by fluorescence light microscopy , 1987, The Journal of cell biology.

[17]  Karen L. Smith,et al.  Ultrastructural investigation of neurons identified and localized using the confocal scanning laser microscope. , 1991, Journal of electron microscopy technique.

[18]  W. W. Stewart Lucifer dyes—highly fluorescent dyes for biological tracing , 1981, Nature.

[19]  A. Boyde Combining confocal and conventional modes in tandem scanning reflected light microscopy , 1989 .

[20]  Alan Boyde,et al.  An evaluation of unilateral TSM for biological applications , 1990 .

[21]  A. Boyde Stereoscopic images in confocal (tandem scanning) microscopy. , 1985, Science.

[22]  P. Schwartzkroin,et al.  Characteristics of CA1 neurons recorded intracellularly in the hippocampalin vitro slice preparation , 1975, Brain Research.

[23]  J. Robinson,et al.  Localization of cerium-based reaction products by scanning laser reflectance confocal microscopy. , 1990, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[24]  J. Swann,et al.  Penicillin-induced epileptogenesis in immature rat CA3 hippocampal pyramidal cells. , 1984, Brain Research.

[25]  G. J. Brakenhoff,et al.  Confocal scanning light microscopy with high aperture immersion lenses , 1979 .

[26]  James N. Turner,et al.  Optimized reflection imaging in laser confocal microscopy and its application to neurobiology: Modificationsa to the biorad MRC‐500 , 1992 .

[27]  A Liljeborg,et al.  A confocal laser microscope scanner for digital recording of optical serial sections , 1989, Journal of Microscopy.

[28]  K. Horikawa,et al.  A versatile means of intracellular labeling: injection of biocytin and its detection with avidin conjugates , 1988, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[29]  H. Berthoud,et al.  Abdominal pathways and central origin of rat vagal fibers that stimulate gastric acid. , 1991, Gastroenterology.