Automatic scoring of dicentric chromosomes as a tool in large scale radiation accidents.

Mass casualty scenarios of radiation exposure require high throughput biological dosimetry techniques for population triage in order to rapidly identify individuals who require clinical treatment. The manual dicentric assay is a highly suitable technique, but it is also very time consuming and requires well trained scorers. In the framework of the MULTIBIODOSE EU FP7 project, semi-automated dicentric scoring has been established in six European biodosimetry laboratories. Whole blood was irradiated with a Co-60 gamma source resulting in 8 different doses between 0 and 4.5Gy and then shipped to the six participating laboratories. To investigate two different scoring strategies, cell cultures were set up with short term (2-3h) or long term (24h) colcemid treatment. Three classifiers for automatic dicentric detection were applied, two of which were developed specifically for these two different culture techniques. The automation procedure included metaphase finding, capture of cells at high resolution and detection of dicentric candidates. The automatically detected dicentric candidates were then evaluated by a trained human scorer, which led to the term 'semi-automated' being applied to the analysis. The six participating laboratories established at least one semi-automated calibration curve each, using the appropriate classifier for their colcemid treatment time. There was no significant difference between the calibration curves established, regardless of the classifier used. The ratio of false positive to true positive dicentric candidates was dose dependent. The total staff effort required for analysing 150 metaphases using the semi-automated approach was 2 min as opposed to 60 min for manual scoring of 50 metaphases. Semi-automated dicentric scoring is a useful tool in a large scale radiation accident as it enables high throughput screening of samples for fast triage of potentially exposed individuals. Furthermore, the results from the participating laboratories were comparable which supports networking between laboratories for this assay.

[1]  C. Fausser,et al.  Review of retrospective dosimetry and their application to experimental reactors , 2013, 2013 3rd International Conference on Advancements in Nuclear Instrumentation, Measurement Methods and their Applications (ANIMMA).

[2]  Laurence Roy,et al.  Biological dosimetry for triage of casualties in a large-scale radiological emergency:capacity of the EU member states. , 2010, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[3]  Ruth C. Wilkins,et al.  Biological Dosimetry by the Triage Dicentric Chromosome Assay: Potential Implications for Treatment of Acute Radiation Syndrome in Radiological Mass Casualties , 2011, Radiation research.

[4]  D. Lloyd,et al.  The role of cytogenetics in early triage of radiation casualties. , 2000, Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine.

[5]  Hubert Thierens,et al.  The dicentric assay in triage mode as a reliable biodosimetric scoring strategy for population triage in large scale radiation accidents , 2012 .

[6]  T. Lörch,et al.  New developments in automated cytogenetic imaging: unattended scoring of dicentric chromosomes, micronuclei, single cell gel electrophoresis, and fluorescence signals , 2004, Cytogenetic and Genome Research.

[7]  Z Carr,et al.  The capacity, capabilities and needs of the WHO BioDoseNet member laboratories. , 2012, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[8]  Elizabeth A Ainsbury,et al.  DOSE ESTIMATION SOFTWARE FOR RADIATION BIODOSIMETRY , 2010, Health physics.

[9]  J F Barquinero,et al.  Biological Dosimetry Intercomparison Exercise: An Evaluation of Triage and Routine Mode Results by Robust Methods , 2011, Radiation research.

[10]  Ruth C Wilkins,et al.  Canadian Cytogenetic Emergency Network (CEN) for biological dosimetry following radiological/nuclear accidents , 2007, International journal of radiation biology.

[11]  Sandrine Roch-Lefevre,et al.  Detection of Partial-Body Exposure to Ionizing Radiation by the Automatic Detection of Dicentrics , 2012, Radiation research.

[12]  R. Wilkins,et al.  QUICKSCAN DICENTRIC CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS FOR RADIATION BIODOSIMETRY , 2010, Health physics.

[13]  L. Marro,et al.  Validation of QuickScan Dicentric Chromosome Analysis for High Throughput Radiation Biological Dosimetry , 2012, Health physics.

[14]  F Trompier,et al.  Realising the European Network of Biodosimetry (RENEB). , 2012, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[15]  P Finnon,et al.  A preliminary evaluation of the Edinburgh dicentric hunter. , 1992, Journal of radiation research.

[16]  Ulrike Kulka,et al.  Cytogenetic damage analysed by the dicentric assay. , 2009, Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita.

[17]  Ruth C. Wilkins,et al.  Pilot website to support international collaboration for dose assessments in a radiation emergency , 2011 .

[18]  I Romero,et al.  Interlaboratory comparison of dicentric chromosome assay using electronically transmitted images. , 2013, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[19]  Eric Grégoire,et al.  Strategy for Population Triage Based on Dicentric Analysis , 2009, Radiation research.

[20]  David C Lloyd,et al.  WHO 1st Consultation on the Development of a Global Biodosimetry Laboratories Network for Radiation Emergencies (BioDoseNet) , 2009, Radiation research.

[21]  F Trompier,et al.  Review of retrospective dosimetry techniques for external ionising radiation exposures. , 2011, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[22]  Florian Baciu,et al.  INCIDENT AND EMERGENCY CENTRE OF THE IAEA , 2010, Health physics.

[23]  G. Stephan,et al.  An Automated Chromosome Aberration Scoring System , 1989 .

[24]  Ruth C. Wilkins,et al.  Interlaboratory Comparison of the Dicentric Chromosome Assay for Radiation Biodosimetry in Mass Casualty Events , 2008, Radiation research.

[25]  Isamu Hayata,et al.  The Chromosome Network for biodosimetry in Japan , 2007 .