A Working Memory Account of the Interaction between Numbers and Spatial Attention

Rather than reflecting the long-term memory construct of a mental number line, it has been proposed that the relation between numbers and space is of a more temporary nature and constructed in working memory during task execution. In three experiments we further explored the viability of this working memory account. Participants performed a speeded dot detection task with dots appearing left or right, while maintaining digits or letters in working memory. Just before presentation of the dot, these digits or letters were used as central cues. These experiments show that the “attentional SNARC-effect” (where SNARC is the spatial–numerical association of response codes) is not observed when only the lastly perceived number cue—and no serially ordered sequence of cues—is maintained in working memory (Experiment 1). It is only when multiple items (numbers in Experiment 2; letters in Experiment 3) are stored in working memory in a serially organized way that the attentional cueing effect is observed as a function of serial working memory position. These observations suggest that the “attentional SNARC-effect” is strongly working memory based. Implications for theories on the mental representation of numbers are discussed.

[1]  M. Barnes,et al.  Working memory and mathematics: A review of developmental, individual difference, and cognitive approaches. , 2010 .

[2]  Masami Ishihara,et al.  Neglect "around the clock": Dissociating number and spatial neglect in right brain damage , 2011 .

[3]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[4]  Jean-Philippe van Dijck,et al.  Numbers are associated with different types of spatial information depending on the task , 2009, Cognition.

[5]  Giovanni Galfano,et al.  Number magnitude orients attention, but not against one’s will , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[6]  S. Monsell Task-set reconfiguration processes do not imply a control homunuculus: Reply to Altmann , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Moving along the Number Line: Operational Momentum in Nonsymbolic Arithmetic , 2006 .

[8]  Michael D. Dodd Negative numbers eliminate, but do not reverse, the attentional SNARC effect , 2011, Psychological research.

[9]  Luisa Girelli,et al.  Placing order in space: the SNARC effect in serial learning , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  John Jonides,et al.  Order Information in Working Memory: fMRI Evidence for Parietal and Prefrontal Mechanisms , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  Martin H. Fischer,et al.  How to cook a SNARC: Number placement in text rapidly changes spatial–numerical associations , 2010, Brain and Cognition.

[12]  Tom Verguts,et al.  Spatial Intuition in Elementary Arithmetic: A Neurocomputational Account , 2012, PloS one.

[13]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Semantic priming in number naming , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[14]  J. Tipples Eye gaze is not unique: Automatic orienting in response to uninformative arrows , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[15]  V. Michel,et al.  Recruitment of an Area Involved in Eye Movements During Mental Arithmetic , 2009, Science.

[16]  Steve Majerus,et al.  Spatial Attention Interacts With Serial-Order Retrieval From Verbal Working Memory , 2013, Psychological science.

[17]  M. Nicholls,et al.  The ups and downs (and lefts and rights) of synaesthetic number forms: Validation from spatial cueing and SNARC-type tasks , 2009, Cortex.

[18]  Martin H. Fischer,et al.  Spatial representations in number processing--evidence from a pointing task , 2003 .

[19]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Temporal order judgment reveals how number magnitude affects visuospatial attention , 2007, Cognition.

[20]  C. Umilta,et al.  How to cook a SNARC? Space may be the critical ingredient, after all: A comment on Fischer, Mills, and Shaki (2010) , 2011, Brain and Cognition.

[21]  Wim Fias,et al.  The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organized , 2003, Cognition.

[22]  Jean-Philippe van Dijck,et al.  A working memory account for spatial–numerical associations , 2011, Cognition.

[23]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Imaging unconscious semantic priming , 1998, Nature.

[24]  G. D. Logan Task Switching , 2022 .

[25]  P. Onghena,et al.  Analysing repeated measures data in cognitive research: A comment on regression coefficient analyses , 2006 .

[26]  Michael D. Dodd,et al.  Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Neural mechanisms of attentional shifts due to irrelevant spatial and numerical cues , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[28]  R. Ulrich,et al.  Effects of truncation on reaction time analysis. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[29]  K. Priftis,et al.  Brain damage: Neglect disrupts the mental number line , 2002, Nature.

[30]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .

[31]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  The spatial representation of numerical and non-numerical sequences: Evidence from neglect , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  A. Kingstone,et al.  The number line effect reflects top-down control , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[33]  C. Semenza,et al.  The role of working memory in the association between number magnitude and space. , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[34]  Wim Fias,et al.  The Heterogeneous Nature of Number–Space Interactions , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[35]  Michael D. Dodd,et al.  Attentional SNARC: There’s something special about numbers (let us count the ways) , 2008, Cognition.

[36]  R. Goebel,et al.  Attentional shifts induced by uninformative number symbols modulate neural activity in human occipital cortex , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[37]  A. Kingstone,et al.  The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze , 1998 .

[38]  Wim Fias,et al.  The neural representation of extensively trained ordered sequences , 2009, NeuroImage.

[39]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  The Spatial Representation of Numerical and Non-Numerical Ordered Sequences: Insights from a Random Generation Task , 2013, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[40]  C. W. Crannell,et al.  A Comparison of Immediate Memory Span for Digits, Letters, and Words , 1957 .